Northern Superior Resources Inc.
Northern Superior Resources Inc. (NSUPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NSUPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSUPF | $1.90 | +4.05% | 329.1M | -27.14 | -$0.07 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $4.27 | -4.69% | 113.6B | 12.94 | $0.33 | +1.65% |
| GFIOF | $39.00 | +0.00% | 34.9B | 9.90 | $3.94 | +4.51% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | N/A |
| NESRF | $14.20 | +3.05% | 20.3B | 16.90 | $0.84 | +2.62% |
| CAHPF | $8.60 | -0.41% | 17.5B | 18.30 | $0.47 | +2.63% |
| LUGDF | $66.69 | +6.49% | 15.8B | 17.33 | $3.77 | +4.86% |
| EDVMF | $62.46 | +4.97% | 15B | 17.82 | $3.48 | +2.34% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | N/A |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | +0.00% | 14B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NSUPF vs ZIJMF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ZIJMF trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ZIJMF's competition here
NSUPF vs GFIOF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while GFIOF trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GFIOF's competition here
NSUPF vs OPYGY Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check OPYGY's competition here
NSUPF vs NESRF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while NESRF trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check NESRF's competition here
NSUPF vs CAHPF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while CAHPF trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check CAHPF's competition here
NSUPF vs LUGDF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while LUGDF trades at $66.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check LUGDF's competition here
NSUPF vs EDVMF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while EDVMF trades at $62.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check EDVMF's competition here
NSUPF vs NSTYY Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check NSTYY's competition here
NSUPF vs HCHDY Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check HCHDY's competition here
NSUPF vs NCMGY Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check NCMGY's competition here
NSUPF vs NCMGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check NCMGF's competition here
NSUPF vs ZHAOF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ZHAOF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ZHAOF's competition here
NSUPF vs HGMCF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while HGMCF trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check HGMCF's competition here
NSUPF vs SBYSF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while SBYSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SBYSF's competition here
NSUPF vs AULGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to AULGF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check AULGF's competition here
NSUPF vs OCANF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while OCANF trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check OCANF's competition here
NSUPF vs DPMLF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while DPMLF trades at $33.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check DPMLF's competition here
NSUPF vs ARGTF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ARGTF trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ARGTF's competition here
NSUPF vs ZIJMY Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ZIJMY trades at $84.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ZIJMY's competition here
NSUPF vs PMNXF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while PMNXF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check PMNXF's competition here
NSUPF vs MAUTF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while MAUTF trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -63.05. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check MAUTF's competition here
NSUPF vs CRNLF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while CRNLF trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check CRNLF's competition here
NSUPF vs GSISF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while GSISF trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GSISF's competition here
NSUPF vs KNTNF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while KNTNF trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check KNTNF's competition here
NSUPF vs RMLRF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while RMLRF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RMLRF's competition here
NSUPF vs TORXF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while TORXF trades at $45.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check TORXF's competition here
NSUPF vs HCHDF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while HCHDF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check HCHDF's competition here
NSUPF vs PAFRF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while PAFRF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check PAFRF's competition here
NSUPF vs REDLF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while REDLF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check REDLF's competition here
NSUPF vs DGMLF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check DGMLF's competition here
NSUPF vs RGRNF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while RGRNF trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RGRNF's competition here
NSUPF vs WDOFF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while WDOFF trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check WDOFF's competition here
NSUPF vs GRLGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GRLGF's competition here
NSUPF vs ELKMF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ELKMF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ELKMF's competition here
NSUPF vs EOGSF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while EOGSF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 37.27. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check EOGSF's competition here
NSUPF vs WFRSF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while WFRSF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check WFRSF's competition here
NSUPF vs CELTF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check CELTF's competition here
NSUPF vs DRDGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while DRDGF trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check DRDGF's competition here
NSUPF vs SNWGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while SNWGF trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -43.96. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SNWGF's competition here
NSUPF vs ORAAF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ORAAF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ORAAF's competition here
NSUPF vs KOZAY Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check KOZAY's competition here
NSUPF vs CXBMF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check CXBMF's competition here
NSUPF vs GUYGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while GUYGF trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -235.67. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GUYGF's competition here
NSUPF vs RMGGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while RMGGF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RMGGF's competition here
NSUPF vs RUPRF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while RUPRF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RUPRF's competition here
NSUPF vs ESGFF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ESGFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ESGFF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ESGFF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ESGFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ESGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ESGFF's competition here
NSUPF vs RMGGY Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while RMGGY trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RMGGY's competition here
NSUPF vs BELGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while BELGF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is -35.69. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to BELGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check BELGF's competition here
NSUPF vs ALKEF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ALKEF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ALKEF's competition here
NSUPF vs RSRBF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while RSRBF trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RSRBF's competition here
NSUPF vs PDIYF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while PDIYF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -52.32. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check PDIYF's competition here
NSUPF vs MNSAF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while MNSAF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check MNSAF's competition here
NSUPF vs OBNNF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check OBNNF's competition here
NSUPF vs OMGGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while OMGGF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -95.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check OMGGF's competition here
NSUPF vs KSKGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while KSKGF trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check KSKGF's competition here
NSUPF vs MWSNF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while MWSNF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -81.90. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check MWSNF's competition here
NSUPF vs RIOFF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 988.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while RIOFF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 229.90. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RIOFF's competition here
NSUPF vs ORZCF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 988M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ORZCF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ORZCF's competition here
NSUPF vs SVLKF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SVLKF's competition here
NSUPF vs SGSVF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SGSVF's competition here
NSUPF vs KRRGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check KRRGF's competition here
NSUPF vs THSGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 705.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while THSGF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is -127.25. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check THSGF's competition here
NSUPF vs WTGRF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check WTGRF's competition here
NSUPF vs RGDFF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RGDFF's competition here
NSUPF vs LGDTF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, LGDTF has a market cap of 663M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while LGDTF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas LGDTF's P/E ratio is -25.09. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to LGDTF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to LGDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check LGDTF's competition here
NSUPF vs GSHRF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, GSHRF has a market cap of 636.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while GSHRF trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas GSHRF's P/E ratio is -105.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to GSHRF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to GSHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GSHRF's competition here
NSUPF vs THXPF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 636.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while THXPF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check THXPF's competition here
NSUPF vs GDRZF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 569.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while GDRZF trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -16.28. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GDRZF's competition here
NSUPF vs MAKOF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 555.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while MAKOF trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check MAKOF's competition here
NSUPF vs PROBF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 539.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while PROBF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -29.39. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check PROBF's competition here
NSUPF vs RMLFF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 532.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while RMLFF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RMLFF's competition here
NSUPF vs ECRTF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 531.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ECRTF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ECRTF's competition here
NSUPF vs AGXKF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 514.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while AGXKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check AGXKF's competition here
NSUPF vs NVMLF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check NVMLF's competition here
NSUPF vs FFMGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 499M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while FFMGF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -9.02. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check FFMGF's competition here
NSUPF vs AMXEF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, AMXEF has a market cap of 486.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while AMXEF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas AMXEF's P/E ratio is -68.10. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to AMXEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to AMXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check AMXEF's competition here
NSUPF vs OSKA Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while OSKA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to OSKA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check OSKA's competition here
NSUPF vs ELEMF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 475.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ELEMF trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 96.10. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ELEMF's competition here
NSUPF vs ARNGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ARNGF's competition here
NSUPF vs STBMF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 459.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while STBMF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check STBMF's competition here
NSUPF vs ASGOF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while ASGOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -16.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check ASGOF's competition here
NSUPF vs CNMVF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, CNMVF has a market cap of 453.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while CNMVF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CNMVF's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to CNMVF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to CNMVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check CNMVF's competition here
NSUPF vs BSXGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, BSXGF has a market cap of 447.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while BSXGF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas BSXGF's P/E ratio is -95.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to BSXGF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to BSXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check BSXGF's competition here
NSUPF vs JAGGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 430.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while JAGGF trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -38.77. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check JAGGF's competition here
NSUPF vs FDMIF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 415.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while FDMIF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -35.85. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check FDMIF's competition here
NSUPF vs BYAGF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, BYAGF has a market cap of 394.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while BYAGF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas BYAGF's P/E ratio is -95.36. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to BYAGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to BYAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check BYAGF's competition here
NSUPF vs HSTXF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 391.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while HSTXF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is -11.73. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check HSTXF's competition here
NSUPF vs LMGDF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check LMGDF's competition here
NSUPF vs MNDJF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 371.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while MNDJF trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check MNDJF's competition here
NSUPF vs SRBIF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 359M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while SRBIF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SRBIF's competition here
NSUPF vs SITKF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 349.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while SITKF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is -82.50. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check SITKF's competition here
NSUPF vs GGAZF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 346.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while GGAZF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +19.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check GGAZF's competition here
NSUPF vs TPRXF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check TPRXF's competition here
NSUPF vs CRTTF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, CRTTF has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while CRTTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas CRTTF's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to CRTTF's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to CRTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check CRTTF's competition here
NSUPF vs RMRDF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, RMRDF has a market cap of 337M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while RMRDF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas RMRDF's P/E ratio is -77.94. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to RMRDF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to RMRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check RMRDF's competition here
NSUPF vs FCSUF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while FCSUF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check FCSUF's competition here
NSUPF vs WHGOF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, WHGOF has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while WHGOF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas WHGOF's P/E ratio is -146.80. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to WHGOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is less volatile compared to WHGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check WHGOF's competition here
NSUPF vs AIRRF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, AIRRF has a market cap of 317.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while AIRRF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas AIRRF's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to AIRRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to AIRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check AIRRF's competition here
NSUPF vs NVAAF Comparison May 2026
NSUPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSUPF stands at 329.1M. In comparison, NVAAF has a market cap of 301M. Regarding current trading prices, NSUPF is priced at $1.90, while NVAAF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSUPF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.14, whereas NVAAF's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, NSUPF's ROE is -2.29%, compared to NVAAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSUPF is more volatile compared to NVAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSUPF.Check NVAAF's competition here