West Wits Mining Limited
West Wits Mining Limited (WMWWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WMWWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMWWF | $0.02 | -13.27% | 70.3M | -2.12 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.69 | -3.76% | 68.5B | 14.08 | $0.19 | +2.03% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +812.70% |
| GFIOF | $25.38 | +0.00% | 22.7B | 18.39 | $1.38 | +2.15% |
| NESRF | $10.03 | -4.02% | 14.3B | 18.92 | $0.53 | +3.27% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.44% |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $46.23 | +1.03% | 11.2B | 20.82 | $2.22 | +3.43% |
| HGMCF | $15.05 | +0.00% | 9.4B | 16.01 | $0.94 | +1.15% |
Stock Comparison
WMWWF vs ZIJMF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ZIJMF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check ZIJMF's competition here
WMWWF vs OPYGY Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and OPYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPYGY's competition here
WMWWF vs GFIOF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while GFIOF trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check GFIOF's competition here
WMWWF vs NESRF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while NESRF trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check NESRF's competition here
WMWWF vs NSTYY Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and NSTYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSTYY's competition here
WMWWF vs NCMGY Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check NCMGY's competition here
WMWWF vs NCMGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check NCMGF's competition here
WMWWF vs LUGDF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while LUGDF trades at $46.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check LUGDF's competition here
WMWWF vs HGMCF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while HGMCF trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and HGMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HGMCF's competition here
WMWWF vs CAHPF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while CAHPF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check CAHPF's competition here
WMWWF vs ZHAOF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ZHAOF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check ZHAOF's competition here
WMWWF vs AULGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and AULGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AULGF's competition here
WMWWF vs EDVMF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while EDVMF trades at $30.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -71.74. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check EDVMF's competition here
WMWWF vs SBYSF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while SBYSF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check SBYSF's competition here
WMWWF vs ARGTF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ARGTF trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -261.36. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check ARGTF's competition here
WMWWF vs DGMLF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check DGMLF's competition here
WMWWF vs ZIJMY Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ZIJMY trades at $53.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check ZIJMY's competition here
WMWWF vs OCANF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while OCANF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check OCANF's competition here
WMWWF vs GRLGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check GRLGF's competition here
WMWWF vs PMNXF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while PMNXF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check PMNXF's competition here
WMWWF vs GSISF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while GSISF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 35.14. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and GSISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSISF's competition here
WMWWF vs DPMLF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while DPMLF trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check DPMLF's competition here
WMWWF vs CRNLF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while CRNLF trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 45.20. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check CRNLF's competition here
WMWWF vs KNTNF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while KNTNF trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check KNTNF's competition here
WMWWF vs TORXF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while TORXF trades at $28.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check TORXF's competition here
WMWWF vs ELKMF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ELKMF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and ELKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELKMF's competition here
WMWWF vs CELTF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and CELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CELTF's competition here
WMWWF vs RGRNF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while RGRNF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -270.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and RGRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGRNF's competition here
WMWWF vs ORAAF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ORAAF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check ORAAF's competition here
WMWWF vs KOZAY Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check KOZAY's competition here
WMWWF vs RMLRF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while RMLRF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and RMLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RMLRF's competition here
WMWWF vs CXBMF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check CXBMF's competition here
WMWWF vs HCHDF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while HCHDF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check HCHDF's competition here
WMWWF vs WDOFF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while WDOFF trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check WDOFF's competition here
WMWWF vs REDLF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while REDLF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and REDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REDLF's competition here
WMWWF vs WFRSF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while WFRSF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and WFRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WFRSF's competition here
WMWWF vs EOGSF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while EOGSF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and EOGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EOGSF's competition here
WMWWF vs OBNNF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check OBNNF's competition here
WMWWF vs PAFRF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check PAFRF's competition here
WMWWF vs DRDGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while DRDGF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check DRDGF's competition here
WMWWF vs MAUTF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while MAUTF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -14.23. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check MAUTF's competition here
WMWWF vs SNWGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while SNWGF trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -48.28. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check SNWGF's competition here
WMWWF vs AURQF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and AURQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AURQF's competition here
WMWWF vs HCHDY Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and HCHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCHDY's competition here
WMWWF vs SVLKF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and SVLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVLKF's competition here
WMWWF vs SGSVF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check SGSVF's competition here
WMWWF vs MWSNF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 863.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while MWSNF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -66.90. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and MWSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MWSNF's competition here
WMWWF vs KRRGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check KRRGF's competition here
WMWWF vs RMGGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 830.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while RMGGF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check RMGGF's competition here
WMWWF vs RUPRF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 829.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while RUPRF trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -177.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check RUPRF's competition here
WMWWF vs RMGGY Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 809.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while RMGGY trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -29.23. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and RMGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RMGGY's competition here
WMWWF vs BELGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 749.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while BELGF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check BELGF's competition here
WMWWF vs WTGRF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check WTGRF's competition here
WMWWF vs RGDFF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check RGDFF's competition here
WMWWF vs PDIYF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 645.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while PDIYF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -24.62. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check PDIYF's competition here
WMWWF vs ASGOF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 586.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ASGOF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check ASGOF's competition here
WMWWF vs MNSAF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 558.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while MNSAF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and MNSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNSAF's competition here
WMWWF vs NVMLF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check NVMLF's competition here
WMWWF vs OSKA Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while OSKA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OSKA's ROE of -36.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check OSKA's competition here
WMWWF vs GUYGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 470.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while GUYGF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check GUYGF's competition here
WMWWF vs RSRBF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 469.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while RSRBF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 80.67. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check RSRBF's competition here
WMWWF vs ARNGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check ARNGF's competition here
WMWWF vs RMLFF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 462M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while RMLFF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check RMLFF's competition here
WMWWF vs RIOFF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 459.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while RIOFF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 108.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check RIOFF's competition here
WMWWF vs GDRZF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while GDRZF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -18.61. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check GDRZF's competition here
WMWWF vs ECRTF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 427.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ECRTF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and ECRTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECRTF's competition here
WMWWF vs ORZCF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 413.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ORZCF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check ORZCF's competition here
WMWWF vs KSKGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 412.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while KSKGF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check KSKGF's competition here
WMWWF vs NRGOF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, NRGOF has a market cap of 387.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while NRGOF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NRGOF's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NRGOF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to NRGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check NRGOF's competition here
WMWWF vs LMGDF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check LMGDF's competition here
WMWWF vs ELEMF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 353.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ELEMF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 72.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check ELEMF's competition here
WMWWF vs THXPF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 350.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while THXPF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check THXPF's competition here
WMWWF vs TPRXF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check TPRXF's competition here
WMWWF vs MAKOF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while MAKOF trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check MAKOF's competition here
WMWWF vs MNDJF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 325.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while MNDJF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check MNDJF's competition here
WMWWF vs OMGGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 323.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while OMGGF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -27.23. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check OMGGF's competition here
WMWWF vs PROBF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 318.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while PROBF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check PROBF's competition here
WMWWF vs ALKEF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 290.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ALKEF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check ALKEF's competition here
WMWWF vs OGNRF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while OGNRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 143.30. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check OGNRF's competition here
WMWWF vs AGXKF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 285.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while AGXKF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check AGXKF's competition here
WMWWF vs MGDPF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check MGDPF's competition here
WMWWF vs OSIIF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and OSIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSIIF's competition here
WMWWF vs ERRSF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check ERRSF's competition here
WMWWF vs FDMIF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while FDMIF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -59.25. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check FDMIF's competition here
WMWWF vs STPGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 214.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while STPGF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check STPGF's competition here
WMWWF vs JAGGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 209.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while JAGGF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -33.07. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check JAGGF's competition here
WMWWF vs GGAZF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 204.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while GGAZF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check GGAZF's competition here
WMWWF vs WRLGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 197.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while WRLGF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check WRLGF's competition here
WMWWF vs HSTXF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 194.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while HSTXF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check HSTXF's competition here
WMWWF vs SAAGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and SAAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAAGF's competition here
WMWWF vs CNLMF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check CNLMF's competition here
WMWWF vs SITKF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while SITKF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check SITKF's competition here
WMWWF vs STBMF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while STBMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and STBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STBMF's competition here
WMWWF vs DCCNF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and DCCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DCCNF's competition here
WMWWF vs MAIFF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while MAIFF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check MAIFF's competition here
WMWWF vs CNMXF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check CNMXF's competition here
WMWWF vs THSGF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while THSGF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check THSGF's competition here
WMWWF vs SRBIF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 171.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while SRBIF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF and SRBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRBIF's competition here
WMWWF vs URGYF Comparison August 2025
WMWWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMWWF stands at 70.3M. In comparison, URGYF has a market cap of 162.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WMWWF is priced at $0.02, while URGYF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMWWF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas URGYF's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, WMWWF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to URGYF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WMWWF is less volatile compared to URGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMWWF.Check URGYF's competition here