WinPro Industries Limited
WinPro Industries Limited (WINPRO.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WINPRO.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Technology Distributors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WINPRO.NS | ₹2.60 | +0.00% | 326.1M | -0.94 | -₹2.76 | N/A |
| OPTIEMUS.NS | ₹406.35 | +0.00% | 37.2B | 56.83 | ₹7.41 | N/A |
| OPTIEMUS.BO | ₹405.30 | +0.00% | 37.1B | 56.64 | ₹7.42 | N/A |
| CREATIVE.NS | ₹739.40 | +0.00% | 11.1B | 20.88 | ₹35.42 | +0.07% |
| CNL.NS | ₹650.55 | +0.58% | 9.6B | 16.71 | ₹38.36 | N/A |
| COLABCLOUD.BO | ₹71.97 | +0.00% | 7.3B | -146.88 | -₹0.49 | +0.01% |
| HCL-INSYS.BO | ₹13.06 | +0.00% | 4.3B | -22.41 | -₹0.58 | N/A |
| HCL-INSYS.NS | ₹13.04 | +0.00% | 4.3B | -22.40 | -₹0.58 | N/A |
| DCI.BO | ₹263.35 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 24.30 | ₹10.77 | N/A |
| DCI.NS | ₹260.95 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 24.13 | ₹10.77 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WINPRO.NS vs OPTIEMUS.NS Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, OPTIEMUS.NS has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while OPTIEMUS.NS trades at ₹406.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas OPTIEMUS.NS's P/E ratio is 56.83. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPTIEMUS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is more volatile compared to OPTIEMUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check OPTIEMUS.NS's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs OPTIEMUS.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, OPTIEMUS.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while OPTIEMUS.BO trades at ₹405.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas OPTIEMUS.BO's P/E ratio is 56.64. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPTIEMUS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is more volatile compared to OPTIEMUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check OPTIEMUS.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs CREATIVE.NS Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, CREATIVE.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while CREATIVE.NS trades at ₹739.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas CREATIVE.NS's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CREATIVE.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to CREATIVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check CREATIVE.NS's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs CNL.NS Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, CNL.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while CNL.NS trades at ₹650.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas CNL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is more volatile compared to CNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check CNL.NS's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs COLABCLOUD.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, COLABCLOUD.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while COLABCLOUD.BO trades at ₹71.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas COLABCLOUD.BO's P/E ratio is -146.88. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COLABCLOUD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is more volatile compared to COLABCLOUD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check COLABCLOUD.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs HCL-INSYS.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, HCL-INSYS.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while HCL-INSYS.BO trades at ₹13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas HCL-INSYS.BO's P/E ratio is -22.41. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HCL-INSYS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to HCL-INSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check HCL-INSYS.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs HCL-INSYS.NS Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, HCL-INSYS.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while HCL-INSYS.NS trades at ₹13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas HCL-INSYS.NS's P/E ratio is -22.40. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HCL-INSYS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to HCL-INSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check HCL-INSYS.NS's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs DCI.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, DCI.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while DCI.BO trades at ₹263.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas DCI.BO's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DCI.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to DCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check DCI.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs DCI.NS Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, DCI.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while DCI.NS trades at ₹260.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas DCI.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DCI.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to DCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check DCI.NS's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs EMPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, EMPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while EMPOWER.BO trades at ₹1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas EMPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 55.33. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is more volatile compared to EMPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check EMPOWER.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs SHRAAITECH.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, SHRAAITECH.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while SHRAAITECH.BO trades at ₹27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas SHRAAITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHRAAITECH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is more volatile compared to SHRAAITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check SHRAAITECH.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs COMPUAGE.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, COMPUAGE.BO has a market cap of 554.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while COMPUAGE.BO trades at ₹9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas COMPUAGE.BO's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COMPUAGE.BO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to COMPUAGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check COMPUAGE.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs MISQUITA.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, MISQUITA.BO has a market cap of 439.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while MISQUITA.BO trades at ₹114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MISQUITA.BO's P/E ratio is 633.33. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MISQUITA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to MISQUITA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check MISQUITA.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs ACCEDERE.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, ACCEDERE.BO has a market cap of 205.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while ACCEDERE.BO trades at ₹43.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ACCEDERE.BO's P/E ratio is 134.41. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACCEDERE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to ACCEDERE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check ACCEDERE.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs LABELKRAFT.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, LABELKRAFT.BO has a market cap of 181.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while LABELKRAFT.BO trades at ₹56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas LABELKRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LABELKRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is more volatile compared to LABELKRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check LABELKRAFT.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs URSUGAR.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, URSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 143.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while URSUGAR.BO trades at ₹2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas URSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to URSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to URSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check URSUGAR.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs COMPINFO.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, COMPINFO.BO has a market cap of 132.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while COMPINFO.BO trades at ₹1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas COMPINFO.BO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COMPINFO.BO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to COMPINFO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check COMPINFO.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs COMPINFO.NS Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, COMPINFO.NS has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while COMPINFO.NS trades at ₹1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas COMPINFO.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COMPINFO.NS's ROE of +6.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to COMPINFO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check COMPINFO.NS's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs SOUTHERNIN.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, SOUTHERNIN.BO has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while SOUTHERNIN.BO trades at ₹21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas SOUTHERNIN.BO's P/E ratio is 111.25. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOUTHERNIN.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to SOUTHERNIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check SOUTHERNIN.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs MILLENNIUM.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, MILLENNIUM.BO has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while MILLENNIUM.BO trades at ₹1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MILLENNIUM.BO's P/E ratio is -53.33. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MILLENNIUM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is more volatile compared to MILLENNIUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check MILLENNIUM.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs PRIYALT.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, PRIYALT.BO has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while PRIYALT.BO trades at ₹20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas PRIYALT.BO's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRIYALT.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to PRIYALT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check PRIYALT.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs MCLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, MCLTD.BO has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while MCLTD.BO trades at ₹6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MCLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -7.66. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MCLTD.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to MCLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check MCLTD.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs MYSTICELE.BO Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, MYSTICELE.BO has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while MYSTICELE.BO trades at ₹3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MYSTICELE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MYSTICELE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to MYSTICELE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check MYSTICELE.BO's competition here
WINPRO.NS vs JUMPNET.NS Comparison February 2026
WINPRO.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WINPRO.NS stands at 326.1M. In comparison, JUMPNET.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WINPRO.NS is priced at ₹2.60, while JUMPNET.NS trades at ₹8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WINPRO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas JUMPNET.NS's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, WINPRO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JUMPNET.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WINPRO.NS is less volatile compared to JUMPNET.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WINPRO.NS.Check JUMPNET.NS's competition here