Munoth Communication Ltd.
Munoth Communication Ltd. (MCLTD.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MCLTD.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Technology Distributors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCLTD.BO | ₹5.87 | +0.34% | 56.6M | -6.83 | -₹0.86 | N/A |
| OPTIEMUS.BO | ₹410.00 | -2.07% | 37.1B | 56.50 | ₹7.41 | N/A |
| OPTIEMUS.NS | ₹415.55 | -1.40% | 36.9B | 55.92 | ₹7.43 | N/A |
| RPTECH.NS | ₹513.50 | -0.35% | 33.4B | 13.84 | ₹36.68 | +0.79% |
| CREATIVE.NS | ₹739.40 | +0.00% | 11.1B | 20.88 | ₹35.42 | +0.07% |
| CNL.NS | ₹619.65 | -7.54% | 9.6B | 16.61 | ₹38.35 | N/A |
| COLABCLOUD.BO | ₹71.97 | +0.00% | 7.3B | -146.88 | -₹0.49 | N/A |
| DCI.NS | ₹281.90 | +3.96% | 4.6B | 23.82 | ₹11.95 | N/A |
| DCI.BO | ₹280.00 | +3.82% | 4.5B | 23.67 | ₹11.96 | N/A |
| TECHLABS.NS | ₹233.00 | -1.54% | 4.1B | 35.64 | ₹6.67 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MCLTD.BO vs OPTIEMUS.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, OPTIEMUS.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while OPTIEMUS.BO trades at ₹410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas OPTIEMUS.BO's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OPTIEMUS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to OPTIEMUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check OPTIEMUS.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs OPTIEMUS.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, OPTIEMUS.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while OPTIEMUS.NS trades at ₹415.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas OPTIEMUS.NS's P/E ratio is 55.92. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OPTIEMUS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to OPTIEMUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check OPTIEMUS.NS's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs RPTECH.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, RPTECH.NS has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while RPTECH.NS trades at ₹513.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas RPTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RPTECH.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to RPTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check RPTECH.NS's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs CREATIVE.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, CREATIVE.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while CREATIVE.NS trades at ₹739.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas CREATIVE.NS's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CREATIVE.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to CREATIVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check CREATIVE.NS's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs CNL.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, CNL.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while CNL.NS trades at ₹619.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas CNL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to CNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check CNL.NS's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs COLABCLOUD.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, COLABCLOUD.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while COLABCLOUD.BO trades at ₹71.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas COLABCLOUD.BO's P/E ratio is -146.88. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COLABCLOUD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO and COLABCLOUD.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COLABCLOUD.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs DCI.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, DCI.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while DCI.NS trades at ₹281.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas DCI.NS's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DCI.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to DCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check DCI.NS's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs DCI.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, DCI.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while DCI.BO trades at ₹280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas DCI.BO's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DCI.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to DCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check DCI.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs TECHLABS.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, TECHLABS.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while TECHLABS.NS trades at ₹233.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas TECHLABS.NS's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TECHLABS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to TECHLABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check TECHLABS.NS's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs HCL-INSYS.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, HCL-INSYS.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while HCL-INSYS.BO trades at ₹11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas HCL-INSYS.BO's P/E ratio is -20.40. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HCL-INSYS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to HCL-INSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check HCL-INSYS.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs HCL-INSYS.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, HCL-INSYS.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while HCL-INSYS.NS trades at ₹11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas HCL-INSYS.NS's P/E ratio is -16.22. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HCL-INSYS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to HCL-INSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check HCL-INSYS.NS's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs EMPOWER.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, EMPOWER.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while EMPOWER.BO trades at ₹2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas EMPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 136.50. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EMPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO and EMPOWER.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMPOWER.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs KORE.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, KORE.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while KORE.NS trades at ₹143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas KORE.NS's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KORE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to KORE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check KORE.NS's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs SHRAAITECH.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, SHRAAITECH.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while SHRAAITECH.BO trades at ₹27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas SHRAAITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SHRAAITECH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to SHRAAITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check SHRAAITECH.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs SLONE.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, SLONE.NS has a market cap of 948.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while SLONE.NS trades at ₹170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas SLONE.NS's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLONE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to SLONE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check SLONE.NS's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs COMPUAGE.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, COMPUAGE.BO has a market cap of 554.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while COMPUAGE.BO trades at ₹9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas COMPUAGE.BO's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COMPUAGE.BO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to COMPUAGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check COMPUAGE.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs MISQUITA.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, MISQUITA.BO has a market cap of 462.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while MISQUITA.BO trades at ₹120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas MISQUITA.BO's P/E ratio is 666.67. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MISQUITA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO and MISQUITA.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MISQUITA.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs WINPRO.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, WINPRO.NS has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while WINPRO.NS trades at ₹2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas WINPRO.NS's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WINPRO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to WINPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check WINPRO.NS's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs GSTL.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, GSTL.NS has a market cap of 302.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while GSTL.NS trades at ₹18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas GSTL.NS's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GSTL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO and GSTL.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSTL.NS's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs ACCEDERE.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, ACCEDERE.BO has a market cap of 264.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while ACCEDERE.BO trades at ₹51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas ACCEDERE.BO's P/E ratio is 172.61. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACCEDERE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to ACCEDERE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check ACCEDERE.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs LABELKRAFT.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, LABELKRAFT.BO has a market cap of 206M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while LABELKRAFT.BO trades at ₹63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas LABELKRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LABELKRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO and LABELKRAFT.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LABELKRAFT.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs URSUGAR.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, URSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 151.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while URSUGAR.BO trades at ₹2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas URSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to URSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to URSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check URSUGAR.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs SOUTHERNIN.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, SOUTHERNIN.BO has a market cap of 120.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while SOUTHERNIN.BO trades at ₹22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas SOUTHERNIN.BO's P/E ratio is -140.94. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SOUTHERNIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO and SOUTHERNIN.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOUTHERNIN.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs COMPINFO.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, COMPINFO.NS has a market cap of 114.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while COMPINFO.NS trades at ₹1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas COMPINFO.NS's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COMPINFO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to COMPINFO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check COMPINFO.NS's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs COMPINFO.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, COMPINFO.BO has a market cap of 112.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while COMPINFO.BO trades at ₹1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas COMPINFO.BO's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COMPINFO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to COMPINFO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check COMPINFO.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs MILLENNIUM.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, MILLENNIUM.BO has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while MILLENNIUM.BO trades at ₹1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas MILLENNIUM.BO's P/E ratio is -162.00. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MILLENNIUM.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO and MILLENNIUM.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MILLENNIUM.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs PRIYALT.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, PRIYALT.BO has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while PRIYALT.BO trades at ₹25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas PRIYALT.BO's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PRIYALT.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO and PRIYALT.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRIYALT.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs MYSTICELE.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, MYSTICELE.BO has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while MYSTICELE.BO trades at ₹3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas MYSTICELE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MYSTICELE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to MYSTICELE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check MYSTICELE.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs CLASELE.BO Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, CLASELE.BO has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while CLASELE.BO trades at ₹2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas CLASELE.BO's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CLASELE.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO and CLASELE.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLASELE.BO's competition here
MCLTD.BO vs JUMPNET.NS Comparison May 2026
MCLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCLTD.BO stands at 56.6M. In comparison, JUMPNET.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCLTD.BO is priced at ₹5.87, while JUMPNET.NS trades at ₹8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.83, whereas JUMPNET.NS's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, MCLTD.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JUMPNET.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCLTD.BO is less volatile compared to JUMPNET.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCLTD.BO.Check JUMPNET.NS's competition here