WildBrain Ltd.

WILD.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WILD.TO stands at 369.43M. In comparison, NFLX.NE has a market cap of 659.94B. Regarding current trading prices, WILD.TO is priced at $1.74, while NFLX.NE trades at $44.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WILD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas NFLX.NE's P/E ratio is 52.74. In terms of profitability, WILD.TO's ROE is +30.13%, compared to NFLX.NE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WILD.TO is more volatile compared to NFLX.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WILD.TO.

WILD.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WILD.TO stands at 369.43M. In comparison, DIS.NE has a market cap of 238.31B. Regarding current trading prices, WILD.TO is priced at $1.74, while DIS.NE trades at $12.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WILD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas DIS.NE's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, WILD.TO's ROE is +30.13%, compared to DIS.NE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WILD.TO is more volatile compared to DIS.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WILD.TO.

WILD.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WILD.TO stands at 369.43M. In comparison, CGX.TO has a market cap of 642.52M. Regarding current trading prices, WILD.TO is priced at $1.74, while CGX.TO trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WILD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas CGX.TO's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, WILD.TO's ROE is +30.13%, compared to CGX.TO's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WILD.TO is more volatile compared to CGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WILD.TO.

WILD.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WILD.TO stands at 369.43M. In comparison, GSQ.CN has a market cap of 51.19M. Regarding current trading prices, WILD.TO is priced at $1.74, while GSQ.CN trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WILD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas GSQ.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, WILD.TO's ROE is +30.13%, compared to GSQ.CN's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WILD.TO is more volatile compared to GSQ.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WILD.TO.

WILD.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WILD.TO stands at 369.43M. In comparison, BRMI.TO has a market cap of 50.59M. Regarding current trading prices, WILD.TO is priced at $1.74, while BRMI.TO trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WILD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas BRMI.TO's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, WILD.TO's ROE is +30.13%, compared to BRMI.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WILD.TO is more volatile compared to BRMI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WILD.TO.

WILD.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WILD.TO stands at 369.43M. In comparison, CJR-B.TO has a market cap of 19.61M. Regarding current trading prices, WILD.TO is priced at $1.74, while CJR-B.TO trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WILD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas CJR-B.TO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WILD.TO's ROE is +30.13%, compared to CJR-B.TO's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WILD.TO is more volatile compared to CJR-B.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WILD.TO.

WILD.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WILD.TO stands at 369.43M. In comparison, AMEN.NE has a market cap of 10.30M. Regarding current trading prices, WILD.TO is priced at $1.74, while AMEN.NE trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WILD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas AMEN.NE's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, WILD.TO's ROE is +30.13%, compared to AMEN.NE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WILD.TO is more volatile compared to AMEN.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WILD.TO.

WILD.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WILD.TO stands at 369.43M. In comparison, XONE.CN has a market cap of 9.83M. Regarding current trading prices, WILD.TO is priced at $1.74, while XONE.CN trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WILD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas XONE.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, WILD.TO's ROE is +30.13%, compared to XONE.CN's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WILD.TO is more volatile compared to XONE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WILD.TO.

WILD.TO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WILD.TO stands at 369.43M. In comparison, SPOR.CN has a market cap of 2.51M. Regarding current trading prices, WILD.TO is priced at $1.74, while SPOR.CN trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WILD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas SPOR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WILD.TO's ROE is +30.13%, compared to SPOR.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WILD.TO is less volatile compared to SPOR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WILD.TO.