The Walt Disney Company (DIS.NE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

DIS.NE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DIS.NE stands at 242.4B. In comparison, NFLX.NE has a market cap of 405.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DIS.NE is priced at CA$11.63, while NFLX.NE trades at CA$27.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DIS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas NFLX.NE's P/E ratio is 304.89. In terms of profitability, DIS.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NFLX.NE's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, DIS.NE is more volatile compared to NFLX.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DIS.NE.Check NFLX.NE's competition here

DIS.NE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DIS.NE stands at 242.4B. In comparison, CGX.TO has a market cap of 741.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DIS.NE is priced at CA$11.63, while CGX.TO trades at CA$11.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DIS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CGX.TO's P/E ratio is -30.76. In terms of profitability, DIS.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGX.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DIS.NE is more volatile compared to CGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DIS.NE.Check CGX.TO's competition here

DIS.NE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DIS.NE stands at 242.4B. In comparison, BRMI.TO has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DIS.NE is priced at CA$11.63, while BRMI.TO trades at CA$8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DIS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas BRMI.TO's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, DIS.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRMI.TO's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DIS.NE is less volatile compared to BRMI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DIS.NE.Check BRMI.TO's competition here

DIS.NE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DIS.NE stands at 242.4B. In comparison, WILD.TO has a market cap of 250.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DIS.NE is priced at CA$11.63, while WILD.TO trades at CA$1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DIS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas WILD.TO's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, DIS.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WILD.TO's ROE of -35.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DIS.NE is less volatile compared to WILD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DIS.NE.Check WILD.TO's competition here

DIS.NE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DIS.NE stands at 242.4B. In comparison, GSQ.CN has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DIS.NE is priced at CA$11.63, while GSQ.CN trades at CA$0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DIS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas GSQ.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, DIS.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSQ.CN's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DIS.NE is more volatile compared to GSQ.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DIS.NE.Check GSQ.CN's competition here

DIS.NE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DIS.NE stands at 242.4B. In comparison, AMEN.NE has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DIS.NE is priced at CA$11.63, while AMEN.NE trades at CA$0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DIS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas AMEN.NE's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, DIS.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMEN.NE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, DIS.NE is more volatile compared to AMEN.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DIS.NE.Check AMEN.NE's competition here

DIS.NE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DIS.NE stands at 242.4B. In comparison, XONE.CN has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DIS.NE is priced at CA$11.63, while XONE.CN trades at CA$0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DIS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas XONE.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, DIS.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XONE.CN's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, DIS.NE is more volatile compared to XONE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DIS.NE.Check XONE.CN's competition here

DIS.NE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DIS.NE stands at 242.4B. In comparison, CJR-B.TO has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DIS.NE is priced at CA$11.63, while CJR-B.TO trades at CA$0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DIS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CJR-B.TO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, DIS.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CJR-B.TO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, DIS.NE is less volatile compared to CJR-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DIS.NE.Check CJR-B.TO's competition here

DIS.NE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DIS.NE stands at 242.4B. In comparison, SPOR.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DIS.NE is priced at CA$11.63, while SPOR.CN trades at CA$0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DIS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas SPOR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, DIS.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPOR.CN's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, DIS.NE is less volatile compared to SPOR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DIS.NE.Check SPOR.CN's competition here