Whirlpool of India Limited
Whirlpool of India Limited (WHIRLPOOL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WHIRLPOOL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHIRLPOOL.NS | ₹903.15 | -0.12% | 116.7B | 35.07 | ₹26.23 | +0.54% |
| AMBER.BO | ₹7,943.75 | +0.34% | 283B | 172.27 | ₹46.71 | N/A |
| AMBER.NS | ₹7,942.50 | +0.16% | 282.9B | 171.96 | ₹46.78 | N/A |
| CROMPTON.NS | ₹262.50 | +0.03% | 169.5B | 36.72 | ₹7.17 | +1.14% |
| CROMPTON.BO | ₹262.45 | -0.02% | 169.5B | 36.71 | ₹7.17 | +1.14% |
| CENTURYPLY.NS | ₹763.45 | +1.15% | 166.6B | 70.14 | ₹10.69 | +0.13% |
| WHIRLPOOL.BO | ₹903.20 | +0.18% | 116.7B | 33.31 | ₹27.62 | +0.54% |
| EUREKAFORB.BO | ₹485.70 | -1.56% | 94.1B | 58.71 | ₹8.28 | N/A |
| EUREKAFORB.NS | ₹485.45 | -1.48% | 93.8B | 58.54 | ₹8.28 | N/A |
| CELLO.NS | ₹418.45 | -2.21% | 91.4B | 29.59 | ₹13.99 | +0.36% |
Stock Comparison
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs AMBER.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, AMBER.BO has a market cap of 283B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while AMBER.BO trades at ₹7,943.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas AMBER.BO's P/E ratio is 172.27. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMBER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to AMBER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check AMBER.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs AMBER.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, AMBER.NS has a market cap of 282.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while AMBER.NS trades at ₹7,942.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas AMBER.NS's P/E ratio is 171.96. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMBER.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to AMBER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check AMBER.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs CROMPTON.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CROMPTON.NS has a market cap of 169.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while CROMPTON.NS trades at ₹262.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas CROMPTON.NS's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CROMPTON.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to CROMPTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check CROMPTON.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs CROMPTON.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CROMPTON.BO has a market cap of 169.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while CROMPTON.BO trades at ₹262.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas CROMPTON.BO's P/E ratio is 36.71. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CROMPTON.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to CROMPTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check CROMPTON.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs CENTURYPLY.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CENTURYPLY.NS has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while CENTURYPLY.NS trades at ₹763.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas CENTURYPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 70.14. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CENTURYPLY.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to CENTURYPLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check CENTURYPLY.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs WHIRLPOOL.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, WHIRLPOOL.BO has a market cap of 116.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while WHIRLPOOL.BO trades at ₹903.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas WHIRLPOOL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WHIRLPOOL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to WHIRLPOOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check WHIRLPOOL.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs EUREKAFORB.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, EUREKAFORB.BO has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while EUREKAFORB.BO trades at ₹485.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas EUREKAFORB.BO's P/E ratio is 58.71. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EUREKAFORB.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to EUREKAFORB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check EUREKAFORB.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs EUREKAFORB.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, EUREKAFORB.NS has a market cap of 93.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while EUREKAFORB.NS trades at ₹485.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas EUREKAFORB.NS's P/E ratio is 58.54. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EUREKAFORB.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to EUREKAFORB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check EUREKAFORB.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs CELLO.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CELLO.NS has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while CELLO.NS trades at ₹418.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas CELLO.NS's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CELLO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to CELLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check CELLO.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs CELLO.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CELLO.BO has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while CELLO.BO trades at ₹418.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas CELLO.BO's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CELLO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to CELLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check CELLO.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs TTKPRESTIG.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, TTKPRESTIG.BO has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while TTKPRESTIG.BO trades at ₹527.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas TTKPRESTIG.BO's P/E ratio is 87.25. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTKPRESTIG.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to TTKPRESTIG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check TTKPRESTIG.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs TTKPRESTIG.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, TTKPRESTIG.NS has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while TTKPRESTIG.NS trades at ₹527.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas TTKPRESTIG.NS's P/E ratio is 87.19. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTKPRESTIG.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to TTKPRESTIG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check TTKPRESTIG.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs AVL.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, AVL.BO has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while AVL.BO trades at ₹490.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas AVL.BO's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to AVL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check AVL.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs GREENLAM.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, GREENLAM.NS has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while GREENLAM.NS trades at ₹240.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas GREENLAM.NS's P/E ratio is 355.76. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GREENLAM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to GREENLAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check GREENLAM.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs GREENLAM.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, GREENLAM.BO has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while GREENLAM.BO trades at ₹241.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas GREENLAM.BO's P/E ratio is 353.36. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GREENLAM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to GREENLAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check GREENLAM.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs SFL.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SFL.BO has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while SFL.BO trades at ₹552.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas SFL.BO's P/E ratio is 68.25. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to SFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check SFL.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs SFL.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SFL.NS has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while SFL.NS trades at ₹553.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas SFL.NS's P/E ratio is 68.01. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to SFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check SFL.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs SYMPHONY.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SYMPHONY.NS has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while SYMPHONY.NS trades at ₹836.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas SYMPHONY.NS's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYMPHONY.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to SYMPHONY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check SYMPHONY.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs SYMPHONY.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SYMPHONY.BO has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while SYMPHONY.BO trades at ₹836.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas SYMPHONY.BO's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYMPHONY.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to SYMPHONY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check SYMPHONY.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs IFBIND.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, IFBIND.NS has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while IFBIND.NS trades at ₹1,093.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas IFBIND.NS's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFBIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to IFBIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check IFBIND.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs IFBIND.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, IFBIND.BO has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while IFBIND.BO trades at ₹1,093.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas IFBIND.BO's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFBIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to IFBIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check IFBIND.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs BAJAJELEC.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, BAJAJELEC.NS has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while BAJAJELEC.NS trades at ₹372.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas BAJAJELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 119.68. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAJAJELEC.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJELEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check BAJAJELEC.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs BAJAJELEC.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, BAJAJELEC.BO has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while BAJAJELEC.BO trades at ₹373.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas BAJAJELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAJAJELEC.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check BAJAJELEC.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs JCHAC.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, JCHAC.NS has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while JCHAC.NS trades at ₹1,432.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas JCHAC.NS's P/E ratio is 138.91. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JCHAC.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to JCHAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check JCHAC.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs JCHAC.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, JCHAC.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while JCHAC.BO trades at ₹1,427.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas JCHAC.BO's P/E ratio is 137.83. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JCHAC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to JCHAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check JCHAC.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs BOSCH-HCIL.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, BOSCH-HCIL.BO has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while BOSCH-HCIL.BO trades at ₹1,434.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas BOSCH-HCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 309.44. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOSCH-HCIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to BOSCH-HCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check BOSCH-HCIL.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs BOSCH-HCIL.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, BOSCH-HCIL.NS has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while BOSCH-HCIL.NS trades at ₹1,421.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas BOSCH-HCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 315.13. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOSCH-HCIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to BOSCH-HCIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check BOSCH-HCIL.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs STYLAMIND.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, STYLAMIND.BO has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while STYLAMIND.BO trades at ₹2,217.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas STYLAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STYLAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to STYLAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check STYLAMIND.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs STYLAMIND.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, STYLAMIND.NS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while STYLAMIND.NS trades at ₹2,217.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas STYLAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STYLAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to STYLAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check STYLAMIND.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs ORIENTELEC.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ORIENTELEC.BO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while ORIENTELEC.BO trades at ₹194.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas ORIENTELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 43.03. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORIENTELEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check ORIENTELEC.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs ORIENTELEC.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ORIENTELEC.NS has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while ORIENTELEC.NS trades at ₹194.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas ORIENTELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 42.89. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORIENTELEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check ORIENTELEC.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs BOROLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, BOROLTD.NS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while BOROLTD.NS trades at ₹236.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas BOROLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOROLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to BOROLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check BOROLTD.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs BOROLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, BOROLTD.BO has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while BOROLTD.BO trades at ₹236.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas BOROLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOROLTD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to BOROLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check BOROLTD.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs CARYSIL.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CARYSIL.NS has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while CARYSIL.NS trades at ₹911.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas CARYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CARYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to CARYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check CARYSIL.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs CARYSIL.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CARYSIL.BO has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while CARYSIL.BO trades at ₹909.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas CARYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CARYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to CARYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check CARYSIL.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs GREENPANEL.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, GREENPANEL.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while GREENPANEL.NS trades at ₹208.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas GREENPANEL.NS's P/E ratio is -2296.00. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GREENPANEL.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to GREENPANEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check GREENPANEL.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs LAOPALA.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, LAOPALA.BO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while LAOPALA.BO trades at ₹202.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas LAOPALA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAOPALA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to LAOPALA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check LAOPALA.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs LAOPALA.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, LAOPALA.NS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while LAOPALA.NS trades at ₹203.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas LAOPALA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAOPALA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to LAOPALA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check LAOPALA.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs NILKAMAL.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, NILKAMAL.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while NILKAMAL.NS trades at ₹1,389.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas NILKAMAL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NILKAMAL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to NILKAMAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check NILKAMAL.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs NILKAMAL.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, NILKAMAL.BO has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while NILKAMAL.BO trades at ₹1,384.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas NILKAMAL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NILKAMAL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to NILKAMAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check NILKAMAL.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs HINDWAREAP.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, HINDWAREAP.BO has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while HINDWAREAP.BO trades at ₹228.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas HINDWAREAP.BO's P/E ratio is -34.79. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINDWAREAP.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to HINDWAREAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check HINDWAREAP.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs HINDWAREAP.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, HINDWAREAP.NS has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while HINDWAREAP.NS trades at ₹227.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas HINDWAREAP.NS's P/E ratio is -34.65. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINDWAREAP.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to HINDWAREAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check HINDWAREAP.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs WEL.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, WEL.NS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while WEL.NS trades at ₹142.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas WEL.NS's P/E ratio is 103.96. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WEL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to WEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check WEL.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs WEL.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, WEL.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while WEL.BO trades at ₹142.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas WEL.BO's P/E ratio is 103.07. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to WEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check WEL.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs STOVEKRAFT.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, STOVEKRAFT.NS has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while STOVEKRAFT.NS trades at ₹487.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas STOVEKRAFT.NS's P/E ratio is 43.41. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STOVEKRAFT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to STOVEKRAFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check STOVEKRAFT.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs STOVEKRAFT.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, STOVEKRAFT.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while STOVEKRAFT.BO trades at ₹486.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas STOVEKRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 43.06. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STOVEKRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to STOVEKRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check STOVEKRAFT.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs BUTTERFLY.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, BUTTERFLY.NS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while BUTTERFLY.NS trades at ₹601.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas BUTTERFLY.NS's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BUTTERFLY.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to BUTTERFLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check BUTTERFLY.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs BUTTERFLY.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, BUTTERFLY.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while BUTTERFLY.BO trades at ₹606.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas BUTTERFLY.BO's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BUTTERFLY.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to BUTTERFLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check BUTTERFLY.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs SAINTGOBAIN.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SAINTGOBAIN.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while SAINTGOBAIN.BO trades at ₹113.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas SAINTGOBAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAINTGOBAIN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to SAINTGOBAIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check SAINTGOBAIN.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs ROBU.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ROBU.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while ROBU.BO trades at ₹1,023.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas ROBU.BO's P/E ratio is 46.45. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROBU.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to ROBU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check ROBU.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs STANLEY.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, STANLEY.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while STANLEY.NS trades at ₹162.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas STANLEY.NS's P/E ratio is 38.94. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STANLEY.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to STANLEY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check STANLEY.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs MIRCELECTR.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, MIRCELECTR.BO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while MIRCELECTR.BO trades at ₹28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas MIRCELECTR.BO's P/E ratio is -41.71. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIRCELECTR.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to MIRCELECTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check MIRCELECTR.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs MIRCELECTR.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, MIRCELECTR.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while MIRCELECTR.NS trades at ₹28.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas MIRCELECTR.NS's P/E ratio is -32.51. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIRCELECTR.NS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to MIRCELECTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check MIRCELECTR.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs RUSHIL.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, RUSHIL.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while RUSHIL.NS trades at ₹17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas RUSHIL.NS's P/E ratio is 55.09. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUSHIL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to RUSHIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check RUSHIL.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs RUSHIL.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, RUSHIL.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while RUSHIL.BO trades at ₹17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas RUSHIL.BO's P/E ratio is 54.85. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUSHIL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to RUSHIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check RUSHIL.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs WIMPLAST.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, WIMPLAST.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while WIMPLAST.BO trades at ₹382.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas WIMPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WIMPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to WIMPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check WIMPLAST.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs SINGER.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SINGER.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while SINGER.BO trades at ₹74.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas SINGER.BO's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SINGER.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to SINGER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check SINGER.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs FOCUS.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, FOCUS.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while FOCUS.NS trades at ₹65.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas FOCUS.NS's P/E ratio is 92.17. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOCUS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to FOCUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check FOCUS.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs BELLACASA.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, BELLACASA.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while BELLACASA.BO trades at ₹276.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas BELLACASA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BELLACASA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to BELLACASA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check BELLACASA.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs SPITZE.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SPITZE.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while SPITZE.BO trades at ₹220.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas SPITZE.BO's P/E ratio is 51.20. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPITZE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to SPITZE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check SPITZE.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs BHATIA.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, BHATIA.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while BHATIA.BO trades at ₹21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas BHATIA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHATIA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to BHATIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check BHATIA.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs VIDEOIND.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, VIDEOIND.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while VIDEOIND.NS trades at ₹7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas VIDEOIND.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIDEOIND.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to VIDEOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check VIDEOIND.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs INFLAME.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, INFLAME.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while INFLAME.BO trades at ₹303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas INFLAME.BO's P/E ratio is 39.05. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INFLAME.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to INFLAME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check INFLAME.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs PILITA.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, PILITA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while PILITA.BO trades at ₹8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas PILITA.BO's P/E ratio is 47.22. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PILITA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to PILITA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check PILITA.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs PILITA.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, PILITA.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while PILITA.NS trades at ₹8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas PILITA.NS's P/E ratio is 46.78. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PILITA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to PILITA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check PILITA.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs SONAMLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SONAMLTD.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while SONAMLTD.NS trades at ₹49.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas SONAMLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SONAMLTD.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to SONAMLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check SONAMLTD.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs AVROIND.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, AVROIND.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while AVROIND.BO trades at ₹134.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas AVROIND.BO's P/E ratio is 45.05. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVROIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to AVROIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check AVROIND.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs AVROIND.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, AVROIND.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while AVROIND.NS trades at ₹132.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas AVROIND.NS's P/E ratio is 43.95. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVROIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to AVROIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check AVROIND.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs SONAMCLOCK.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SONAMCLOCK.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while SONAMCLOCK.NS trades at ₹81.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas SONAMCLOCK.NS's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SONAMCLOCK.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to SONAMCLOCK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check SONAMCLOCK.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs AIROLAM.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, AIROLAM.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while AIROLAM.NS trades at ₹91.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas AIROLAM.NS's P/E ratio is 51.28. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIROLAM.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to AIROLAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check AIROLAM.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs PRIMAPLA.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, PRIMAPLA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while PRIMAPLA.BO trades at ₹119.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas PRIMAPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRIMAPLA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to PRIMAPLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check PRIMAPLA.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs TEXELIN.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, TEXELIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while TEXELIN.BO trades at ₹82.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas TEXELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEXELIN.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to TEXELIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check TEXELIN.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs FOCUS.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, FOCUS.BO has a market cap of 909.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while FOCUS.BO trades at ₹125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas FOCUS.BO's P/E ratio is 77.64. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOCUS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to FOCUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check FOCUS.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs PRITI.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, PRITI.NS has a market cap of 630.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while PRITI.NS trades at ₹47.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas PRITI.NS's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRITI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to PRITI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check PRITI.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs SACHEMT.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SACHEMT.BO has a market cap of 488.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while SACHEMT.BO trades at ₹3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas SACHEMT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SACHEMT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to SACHEMT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check SACHEMT.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs KHAITANLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, KHAITANLTD.BO has a market cap of 450.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while KHAITANLTD.BO trades at ₹92.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas KHAITANLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KHAITANLTD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to KHAITANLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check KHAITANLTD.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs KHAITANLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, KHAITANLTD.NS has a market cap of 443.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while KHAITANLTD.NS trades at ₹94.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas KHAITANLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KHAITANLTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to KHAITANLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check KHAITANLTD.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs ADL.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ADL.BO has a market cap of 422.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while ADL.BO trades at ₹74.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas ADL.BO's P/E ratio is 3797.50. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to ADL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check ADL.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs ADL.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ADL.NS has a market cap of 392.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while ADL.NS trades at ₹72.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas ADL.NS's P/E ratio is 3523.00. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to ADL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check ADL.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs GORANIN.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, GORANIN.BO has a market cap of 319.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while GORANIN.BO trades at ₹57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas GORANIN.BO's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GORANIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to GORANIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check GORANIN.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs TIRUFOAM.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, TIRUFOAM.BO has a market cap of 315.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while TIRUFOAM.BO trades at ₹75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas TIRUFOAM.BO's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIRUFOAM.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to TIRUFOAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check TIRUFOAM.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs GUJRAFIA.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, GUJRAFIA.BO has a market cap of 300.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while GUJRAFIA.BO trades at ₹55.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas GUJRAFIA.BO's P/E ratio is 94.24. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GUJRAFIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to GUJRAFIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check GUJRAFIA.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs MILEFUR.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, MILEFUR.BO has a market cap of 278M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while MILEFUR.BO trades at ₹29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas MILEFUR.BO's P/E ratio is -74.75. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MILEFUR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to MILEFUR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check MILEFUR.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs JAIMATAG.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, JAIMATAG.BO has a market cap of 230M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while JAIMATAG.BO trades at ₹2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas JAIMATAG.BO's P/E ratio is -32.86. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JAIMATAG.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to JAIMATAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check JAIMATAG.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs JAIPAN.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, JAIPAN.BO has a market cap of 157.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while JAIPAN.BO trades at ₹25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas JAIPAN.BO's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JAIPAN.BO's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to JAIPAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check JAIPAN.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs APIL.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, APIL.BO has a market cap of 135.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while APIL.BO trades at ₹41.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas APIL.BO's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APIL.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to APIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check APIL.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs SEASONST.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SEASONST.BO has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while SEASONST.BO trades at ₹19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas SEASONST.BO's P/E ratio is -180.00. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEASONST.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to SEASONST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check SEASONST.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs KAHAN.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, KAHAN.BO has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while KAHAN.BO trades at ₹46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas KAHAN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KAHAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to KAHAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check KAHAN.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs PHOTOQUP.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, PHOTOQUP.BO has a market cap of 101.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while PHOTOQUP.BO trades at ₹16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas PHOTOQUP.BO's P/E ratio is 73.43. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHOTOQUP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to PHOTOQUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check PHOTOQUP.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs MPL.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, MPL.BO has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while MPL.BO trades at ₹7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas MPL.BO's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to MPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check MPL.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs KUWERIN.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, KUWERIN.BO has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while KUWERIN.BO trades at ₹7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas KUWERIN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KUWERIN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to KUWERIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check KUWERIN.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs GOLCA.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, GOLCA.BO has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while GOLCA.BO trades at ₹10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas GOLCA.BO's P/E ratio is -43.91. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOLCA.BO's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to GOLCA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check GOLCA.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs JIKIND.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, JIKIND.NS has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while JIKIND.NS trades at ₹0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas JIKIND.NS's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JIKIND.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to JIKIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check JIKIND.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs WFL.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, WFL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while WFL.NS trades at ₹269.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas WFL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to WFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check WFL.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs EUREKAFORBE.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, EUREKAFORBE.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while EUREKAFORBE.BO trades at ₹502.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas EUREKAFORBE.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EUREKAFORBE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to EUREKAFORBE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check EUREKAFORBE.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs ELIL.BO Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ELIL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while ELIL.BO trades at ₹202.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas ELIL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELIL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to ELIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check ELIL.BO's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs SHIL.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SHIL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while SHIL.NS trades at ₹272.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas SHIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is less volatile compared to SHIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check SHIL.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs ACRYSIL.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ACRYSIL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while ACRYSIL.NS trades at ₹494.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas ACRYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACRYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to ACRYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check ACRYSIL.NS's competition here
WHIRLPOOL.NS vs HSIL.NS Comparison February 2026
WHIRLPOOL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHIRLPOOL.NS stands at 116.7B. In comparison, HSIL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHIRLPOOL.NS is priced at ₹903.15, while HSIL.NS trades at ₹298.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHIRLPOOL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.07, whereas HSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, WHIRLPOOL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HSIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHIRLPOOL.NS is more volatile compared to HSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHIRLPOOL.NS.Check HSIL.NS's competition here