Williston Holding Company, Inc.
Williston Holding Company, Inc. WHCA Peers
See (WHCA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHCA | $0.00 | +0.00% | 401756.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CMPGF | $35.63 | -56.02% | 60.48B | 41.43 | $0.86 | +1.67% |
| CMPGY | $35.05 | -0.11% | 59.48B | 40.76 | $0.86 | +1.70% |
| RSTRF | $67.04 | +12.63% | 30.39B | 22.57 | $2.97 | +3.52% |
| HDALF | $1.89 | -19.57% | 10.23B | 15.75 | $0.12 | +1.15% |
| MDNDF | $39.35 | -9.33% | 5.23B | 24.14 | $1.63 | +0.79% |
| JBFCY | $18.63 | +4.34% | 5.21B | 30.04 | $0.62 | +1.23% |
| JBFCF | $4.42 | -0.85% | 4.95B | 29.48 | $0.15 | +1.23% |
| ATGSY | $6.55 | N/A | 2.50B | -40.94 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| SKLYF | $10.70 | N/A | 2.43B | 152.86 | $0.07 | +0.01% |
Stock Comparison
WHCA vs CMPGF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, CMPGF has a market cap of 60.48B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while CMPGF trades at $35.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPGF's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to CMPGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to CMPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs CMPGY Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, CMPGY has a market cap of 59.48B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while CMPGY trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPGY's P/E ratio is 40.76. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to CMPGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to CMPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs RSTRF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, RSTRF has a market cap of 30.39B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while RSTRF trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSTRF's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to RSTRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to RSTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs HDALF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, HDALF has a market cap of 10.23B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while HDALF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDALF's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to HDALF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to HDALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs MDNDF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, MDNDF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while MDNDF trades at $39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDNDF's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to MDNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to MDNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs JBFCY Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, JBFCY has a market cap of 5.21B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while JBFCY trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBFCY's P/E ratio is 30.04. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to JBFCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to JBFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs JBFCF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, JBFCF has a market cap of 4.95B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while JBFCF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBFCF's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to JBFCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to JBFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs ATGSY Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, ATGSY has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while ATGSY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATGSY's P/E ratio is -40.94. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to ATGSY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to ATGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs SKLYF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, SKLYF has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while SKLYF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKLYF's P/E ratio is 152.86. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to SKLYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to SKLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs DLII Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, DLII has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while DLII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to DLII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is less volatile compared to DLII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs ATGSF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, ATGSF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while ATGSF trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATGSF's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to ATGSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to ATGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs SGLOF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, SGLOF has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while SGLOF trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLOF's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to SGLOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to SGLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs ALSSF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, ALSSF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while ALSSF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALSSF's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to ALSSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to ALSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs HLFFF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, HLFFF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while HLFFF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLFFF's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to HLFFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to HLFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs HELFY Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, HELFY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while HELFY trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HELFY's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to HELFY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to HELFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs ARHOF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, ARHOF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while ARHOF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARHOF's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to ARHOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to ARHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs MBPFF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, MBPFF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while MBPFF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBPFF's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to MBPFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to MBPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs SSPPF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, SSPPF has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while SSPPF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSPPF's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to SSPPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to SSPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs DMZPY Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, DMZPY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while DMZPY trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMZPY's P/E ratio is 204.38. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to DMZPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to DMZPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs DPZUF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, DPZUF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while DPZUF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPZUF's P/E ratio is 181.11. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to DPZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to DPZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs DPUKY Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, DPUKY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while DPUKY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPUKY's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to DPUKY's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to DPUKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs DMPZF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, DMPZF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while DMPZF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMPZF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to DMPZF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to DMPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs ELORY Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, ELORY has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while ELORY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELORY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to ELORY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to ELORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs LKNCY Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, LKNCY has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while LKNCY trades at $31.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKNCY's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to LKNCY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to LKNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs JDWPY Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, JDWPY has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while JDWPY trades at $50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDWPY's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to JDWPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to JDWPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs JDWPF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, JDWPF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while JDWPF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDWPF's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to JDWPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to JDWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs MTYFF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, MTYFF has a market cap of 748.34M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while MTYFF trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTYFF's P/E ratio is 125.15. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to MTYFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to MTYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs RSTGF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, RSTGF has a market cap of 649.69M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while RSTGF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSTGF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to RSTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to RSTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs ELROF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, ELROF has a market cap of 616.08M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while ELROF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELROF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to ELROF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to ELROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs CLLFF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, CLLFF has a market cap of 572.91M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while CLLFF trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLLFF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to CLLFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to CLLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs CFCGF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, CFCGF has a market cap of 531.02M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while CFCGF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFCGF's P/E ratio is 92.56. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to CFCGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to CFCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs MLYSF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, MLYSF has a market cap of 399.04M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while MLYSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLYSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to MLYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to MLYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs FBGI Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, FBGI has a market cap of 368.44M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while FBGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBGI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to FBGI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to FBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs FMBRY Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, FMBRY has a market cap of 291.09M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while FMBRY trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMBRY's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to FMBRY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to FMBRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs MARZF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, MARZF has a market cap of 285.68M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while MARZF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARZF's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to MARZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to MARZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs MRTPY Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, MRTPY has a market cap of 274.02M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while MRTPY trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRTPY's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to MRTPY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to MRTPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs PZRIF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, PZRIF has a market cap of 258.25M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while PZRIF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PZRIF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to PZRIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to PZRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs FRWDF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, FRWDF has a market cap of 234.49M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while FRWDF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRWDF's P/E ratio is 45.25. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to FRWDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to FRWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs RTBRF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, RTBRF has a market cap of 213.34M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while RTBRF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTBRF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to RTBRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to RTBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs CRNGF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, CRNGF has a market cap of 172.85M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while CRNGF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to CRNGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to CRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs XIAXF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, XIAXF has a market cap of 119.10M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while XIAXF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIAXF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to XIAXF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to XIAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs RFGPF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, RFGPF has a market cap of 100.69M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while RFGPF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFGPF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to RFGPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to RFGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs MHGUP Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, MHGUP has a market cap of 78.26M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while MHGUP trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHGUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to MHGUP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to MHGUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs MHGU Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, MHGU has a market cap of 74.77M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while MHGU trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHGU's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to MHGU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to MHGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs FRHHF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, FRHHF has a market cap of 50.49M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while FRHHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRHHF's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to FRHHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to FRHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs TNGPF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, TNGPF has a market cap of 47.55M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while TNGPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNGPF's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to TNGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to TNGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs GLLDF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, GLLDF has a market cap of 27.40M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while GLLDF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLLDF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to GLLDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to GLLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs FCCI Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, FCCI has a market cap of 26.11M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while FCCI trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to FCCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to FCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs SCUPF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, SCUPF has a market cap of 23.88M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while SCUPF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCUPF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to SCUPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to SCUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs MORRF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, MORRF has a market cap of 20.07M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while MORRF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to MORRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to MORRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs ODDAF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, ODDAF has a market cap of 15.26M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while ODDAF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODDAF's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to ODDAF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to ODDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs JKHCF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, JKHCF has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while JKHCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JKHCF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to JKHCF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to JKHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs GGLT Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, GGLT has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while GGLT trades at $499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGLT's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to GGLT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to GGLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs NROM Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, NROM has a market cap of 4.22M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while NROM trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NROM's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to NROM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to NROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs COFE Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, COFE has a market cap of 3.52M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while COFE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COFE's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to COFE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to COFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs SCFFF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, SCFFF has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while SCFFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCFFF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to SCFFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to SCFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs ZAAG Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, ZAAG has a market cap of 952803.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while ZAAG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to ZAAG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to ZAAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs BDVB Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, BDVB has a market cap of 764233.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while BDVB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDVB's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to BDVB's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to BDVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs GAMN Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, GAMN has a market cap of 389931.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while GAMN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAMN's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to GAMN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to GAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs KITL Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, KITL has a market cap of 326200.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while KITL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KITL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to KITL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to KITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs GTEH Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, GTEH has a market cap of 139960.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while GTEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to GTEH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to GTEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs BLUU Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, BLUU has a market cap of 37272.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while BLUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to BLUU's ROE of +3.93%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to BLUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs GMPR Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, GMPR has a market cap of 36282.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while GMPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to GMPR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to GMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs GASMF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, GASMF has a market cap of 29755.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while GASMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to GASMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to GASMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs BBUCQ Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, BBUCQ has a market cap of 17240.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while BBUCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBUCQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to BBUCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to BBUCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs SWRL Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, SWRL has a market cap of 11033.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while SWRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to SWRL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to SWRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs RIBS Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, RIBS has a market cap of 9755.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while RIBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIBS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to RIBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to RIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs PFSF Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, PFSF has a market cap of 5136.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while PFSF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFSF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to PFSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to PFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs CORG Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, CORG has a market cap of 2722.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while CORG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to CORG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to CORG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs AMHG Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, AMHG has a market cap of 1683.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while AMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMHG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to AMHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to AMHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs GCFB Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, GCFB has a market cap of 1436.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while GCFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to GCFB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to GCFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs HTRE Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, HTRE has a market cap of 171.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while HTRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTRE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to HTRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to HTRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.
WHCA vs ULFS Comparison
WHCA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHCA stands at 401756.00. In comparison, ULFS has a market cap of 70.00. Regarding current trading prices, WHCA is priced at $0.00, while ULFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHCA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULFS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WHCA's ROE is N/A, compared to ULFS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHCA is more volatile compared to ULFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHCA.