West African Resources Limited
West African Resources Limited (WFRSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WFRSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFRSF | $2.19 | -18.89% | 3.2B | 14.00 | $0.20 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $5.58 | +0.00% | 147.9B | 23.17 | $0.24 | +1.26% |
| GFIOF | $51.00 | +0.00% | 45.6B | 24.40 | $2.09 | +1.53% |
| NESRF | $20.21 | -0.69% | 28.9B | 24.35 | $0.83 | +1.76% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +233.26% |
| CAHPF | $10.00 | -4.76% | 20.3B | 21.28 | $0.47 | +1.29% |
| LUGDF | $79.46 | +0.00% | 19.1B | 27.92 | $2.83 | +3.52% |
| ZHAOF | $4.40 | +3.53% | 15.4B | 46.11 | $0.09 | +0.17% |
| EDVMF | $62.66 | +0.01% | 15.3B | 32.13 | $1.98 | +1.87% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WFRSF vs ZIJMF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ZIJMF trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ZIJMF's competition here
WFRSF vs GFIOF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while GFIOF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check GFIOF's competition here
WFRSF vs NESRF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while NESRF trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check NESRF's competition here
WFRSF vs OPYGY Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check OPYGY's competition here
WFRSF vs CAHPF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while CAHPF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check CAHPF's competition here
WFRSF vs LUGDF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while LUGDF trades at $79.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check LUGDF's competition here
WFRSF vs ZHAOF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ZHAOF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 46.11. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ZHAOF's competition here
WFRSF vs EDVMF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while EDVMF trades at $62.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check EDVMF's competition here
WFRSF vs NSTYY Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check NSTYY's competition here
WFRSF vs NCMGY Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check NCMGY's competition here
WFRSF vs NCMGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check NCMGF's competition here
WFRSF vs HGMCF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while HGMCF trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check HGMCF's competition here
WFRSF vs SBYSF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while SBYSF trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -47.69. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check SBYSF's competition here
WFRSF vs OCANF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while OCANF trades at $38.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check OCANF's competition here
WFRSF vs AULGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AULGF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check AULGF's competition here
WFRSF vs ZIJMY Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ZIJMY trades at $110.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ZIJMY's competition here
WFRSF vs DPMLF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while DPMLF trades at $38.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check DPMLF's competition here
WFRSF vs ARGTF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ARGTF trades at $28.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is 45.31. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ARGTF's competition here
WFRSF vs RMLRF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while RMLRF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check RMLRF's competition here
WFRSF vs GSISF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while GSISF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check GSISF's competition here
WFRSF vs PMNXF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while PMNXF trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check PMNXF's competition here
WFRSF vs KNTNF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while KNTNF trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check KNTNF's competition here
WFRSF vs HCHDF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while HCHDF trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 34.45. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check HCHDF's competition here
WFRSF vs TORXF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while TORXF trades at $47.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check TORXF's competition here
WFRSF vs PAFRF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while PAFRF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check PAFRF's competition here
WFRSF vs CRNLF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while CRNLF trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check CRNLF's competition here
WFRSF vs RGRNF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while RGRNF trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check RGRNF's competition here
WFRSF vs MAUTF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while MAUTF trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -56.13. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check MAUTF's competition here
WFRSF vs REDLF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while REDLF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check REDLF's competition here
WFRSF vs DGMLF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check DGMLF's competition here
WFRSF vs DRDGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while DRDGF trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check DRDGF's competition here
WFRSF vs EOGSF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while EOGSF trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 50.72. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check EOGSF's competition here
WFRSF vs GRLGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check GRLGF's competition here
WFRSF vs WDOFF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while WDOFF trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check WDOFF's competition here
WFRSF vs ELKMF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ELKMF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ELKMF's competition here
WFRSF vs CELTF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check CELTF's competition here
WFRSF vs RMGGY Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while RMGGY trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is 171.67. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check RMGGY's competition here
WFRSF vs RMGGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while RMGGF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is 102.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check RMGGF's competition here
WFRSF vs SNWGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while SNWGF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -55.05. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check SNWGF's competition here
WFRSF vs ORAAF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ORAAF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ORAAF's competition here
WFRSF vs KOZAY Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check KOZAY's competition here
WFRSF vs BELGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while BELGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is -64.50. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BELGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check BELGF's competition here
WFRSF vs CXBMF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check CXBMF's competition here
WFRSF vs PDIYF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while PDIYF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -67.91. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check PDIYF's competition here
WFRSF vs ESGFF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ESGFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ESGFF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ESGFF's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESGFF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ESGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ESGFF's competition here
WFRSF vs ALKEF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ALKEF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ALKEF's competition here
WFRSF vs MNSAF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while MNSAF trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check MNSAF's competition here
WFRSF vs RSRBF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while RSRBF trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -21.35. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check RSRBF's competition here
WFRSF vs OBNNF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check OBNNF's competition here
WFRSF vs RUPRF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while RUPRF trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -267.50. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check RUPRF's competition here
WFRSF vs GUYGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while GUYGF trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -114.75. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check GUYGF's competition here
WFRSF vs KSKGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while KSKGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 52.63. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check KSKGF's competition here
WFRSF vs ORZCF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ORZCF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ORZCF's competition here
WFRSF vs RIOFF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while RIOFF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 121.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check RIOFF's competition here
WFRSF vs MWSNF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while MWSNF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -81.90. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check MWSNF's competition here
WFRSF vs HCHDY Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check HCHDY's competition here
WFRSF vs SVLKF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check SVLKF's competition here
WFRSF vs OMGGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 909.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while OMGGF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -143.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check OMGGF's competition here
WFRSF vs SGSVF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check SGSVF's competition here
WFRSF vs KRRGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check KRRGF's competition here
WFRSF vs THXPF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 759.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while THXPF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check THXPF's competition here
WFRSF vs ASGOF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 717.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ASGOF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of +117.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ASGOF's competition here
WFRSF vs WTGRF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check WTGRF's competition here
WFRSF vs RGDFF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check RGDFF's competition here
WFRSF vs MAKOF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 629.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while MAKOF trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check MAKOF's competition here
WFRSF vs FFMGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 626.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while FFMGF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -46.50. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is less volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check FFMGF's competition here
WFRSF vs STBMF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 604.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while STBMF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check STBMF's competition here
WFRSF vs THSGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 594.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while THSGF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is -113.75. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check THSGF's competition here
WFRSF vs HSTXF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 546.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while HSTXF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check HSTXF's competition here
WFRSF vs JAGGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 544.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while JAGGF trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -31.95. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check JAGGF's competition here
WFRSF vs PROBF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 539.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while PROBF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -29.39. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check PROBF's competition here
WFRSF vs ECRTF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 531.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ECRTF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ECRTF's competition here
WFRSF vs GSHRF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GSHRF has a market cap of 528.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while GSHRF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas GSHRF's P/E ratio is -107.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GSHRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to GSHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check GSHRF's competition here
WFRSF vs NVMLF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check NVMLF's competition here
WFRSF vs LGDTF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LGDTF has a market cap of 493.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while LGDTF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas LGDTF's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LGDTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to LGDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check LGDTF's competition here
WFRSF vs RMLFF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 493.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while RMLFF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check RMLFF's competition here
WFRSF vs OSKA Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while OSKA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OSKA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check OSKA's competition here
WFRSF vs ELEMF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 475.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ELEMF trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 96.10. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ELEMF's competition here
WFRSF vs ARNGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check ARNGF's competition here
WFRSF vs GDRZF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 461.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while GDRZF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -15.04. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check GDRZF's competition here
WFRSF vs AGXKF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 456.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while AGXKF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check AGXKF's competition here
WFRSF vs AMXEF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AMXEF has a market cap of 452.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while AMXEF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas AMXEF's P/E ratio is -106.67. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMXEF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to AMXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check AMXEF's competition here
WFRSF vs BSXGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BSXGF has a market cap of 392.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while BSXGF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas BSXGF's P/E ratio is -83.28. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BSXGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is less volatile compared to BSXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check BSXGF's competition here
WFRSF vs STPGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 386.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while STPGF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check STPGF's competition here
WFRSF vs LMGDF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check LMGDF's competition here
WFRSF vs BYAGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BYAGF has a market cap of 377.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while BYAGF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas BYAGF's P/E ratio is -91.60. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BYAGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is less volatile compared to BYAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check BYAGF's competition here
WFRSF vs MNDJF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 371.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while MNDJF trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check MNDJF's competition here
WFRSF vs WRLGF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 353.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while WRLGF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check WRLGF's competition here
WFRSF vs TPRXF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check TPRXF's competition here
WFRSF vs GGAZF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 341.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while GGAZF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +25.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check GGAZF's competition here
WFRSF vs NSUPF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NSUPF has a market cap of 329.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while NSUPF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas NSUPF's P/E ratio is -27.14. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NSUPF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to NSUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check NSUPF's competition here
WFRSF vs FDMIF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while FDMIF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -31.47. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check FDMIF's competition here
WFRSF vs SRBIF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 325.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while SRBIF trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check SRBIF's competition here
WFRSF vs MMTMF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MMTMF has a market cap of 324.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while MMTMF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas MMTMF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MMTMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to MMTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check MMTMF's competition here
WFRSF vs KFFLF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KFFLF has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while KFFLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas KFFLF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KFFLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is less volatile compared to KFFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check KFFLF's competition here
WFRSF vs CRTTF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRTTF has a market cap of 297.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while CRTTF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas CRTTF's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRTTF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to CRTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check CRTTF's competition here
WFRSF vs OGNRF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while OGNRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 143.30. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check OGNRF's competition here
WFRSF vs SITKF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while SITKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is 1.01. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check SITKF's competition here
WFRSF vs WHGOF Comparison February 2026
WFRSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFRSF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WHGOF has a market cap of 287.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFRSF is priced at $2.19, while WHGOF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFRSF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.00, whereas WHGOF's P/E ratio is -130.00. In terms of profitability, WFRSF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WHGOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFRSF is more volatile compared to WHGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFRSF.Check WHGOF's competition here