Whole Foods Market, Inc. (WFM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WFM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFM | $41.99 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SYY | $76.29 | +2.61% | 36.5B | 21.19 | $3.60 | +2.85% |
| USFD | $84.61 | +2.93% | 18.6B | 28.49 | $2.97 | N/A |
| PFGC | $97.12 | +3.40% | 15.3B | 46.25 | $2.10 | N/A |
| UNFI | $55.52 | +4.81% | 3.4B | -42.37 | -$1.31 | N/A |
| CHEF | $80.74 | +4.13% | 3.3B | 44.12 | $1.83 | N/A |
| ANDE | $72.81 | -0.22% | 2.5B | 19.42 | $3.75 | +1.09% |
| SPTN | $26.90 | +0.00% | 910.9M | -57.23 | -$0.47 | +1.64% |
| AVO | $10.22 | -3.77% | 724.5M | 22.22 | $0.46 | N/A |
| WILC | $33.61 | -1.73% | 481.4M | 14.90 | $2.32 | +2.86% |
Stock Comparison
WFM vs SYY Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, SYY has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while SYY trades at $76.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYY's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYY's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to SYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check SYY's competition here
WFM vs USFD Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, USFD has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while USFD trades at $84.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USFD's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to USFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check USFD's competition here
WFM vs PFGC Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, PFGC has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while PFGC trades at $97.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFGC's P/E ratio is 46.25. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFGC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to PFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check PFGC's competition here
WFM vs UNFI Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, UNFI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while UNFI trades at $55.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNFI's P/E ratio is -42.37. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNFI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to UNFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check UNFI's competition here
WFM vs CHEF Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, CHEF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while CHEF trades at $80.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHEF's P/E ratio is 44.12. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to CHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check CHEF's competition here
WFM vs ANDE Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, ANDE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while ANDE trades at $72.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANDE's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANDE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to ANDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check ANDE's competition here
WFM vs SPTN Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, SPTN has a market cap of 910.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while SPTN trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTN's P/E ratio is -57.23. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPTN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is more volatile compared to SPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check SPTN's competition here
WFM vs AVO Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, AVO has a market cap of 724.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while AVO trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVO's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to AVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check AVO's competition here
WFM vs WILC Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, WILC has a market cap of 481.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while WILC trades at $33.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WILC's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WILC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to WILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check WILC's competition here
WFM vs CVGW Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, CVGW has a market cap of 466.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while CVGW trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVGW's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVGW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is more volatile compared to CVGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check CVGW's competition here
WFM vs HFFG Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, HFFG has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while HFFG trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HFFG's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HFFG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to HFFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check HFFG's competition here
WFM vs DIT Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, DIT has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while DIT trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIT's P/E ratio is 161.70. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to DIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check DIT's competition here
WFM vs CCHH Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, CCHH has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while CCHH trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCHH's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCHH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to CCHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check CCHH's competition here
WFM vs TWG Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, TWG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while TWG trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWG's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to TWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check TWG's competition here
WFM vs VSTD Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, VSTD has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while VSTD trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSTD's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VSTD's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to VSTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check VSTD's competition here
WFM vs GLDC Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, GLDC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while GLDC trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLDC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to GLDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check GLDC's competition here
WFM vs SVU Comparison June 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, SVU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while SVU trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is more volatile compared to SVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check SVU's competition here