Whole Foods Market, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for WFM
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for WFM
Whole Foods Market, Inc. (WFM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WFM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFM | $41.99 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SYY | $76.27 | +3.00% | 36.5B | 20.55 | $3.71 | +2.83% |
| USFD | $93.69 | +4.33% | 20.7B | 31.87 | $2.94 | N/A |
| PFGC | $93.50 | +5.04% | 14.7B | 42.30 | $2.21 | N/A |
| UNFI | $48.90 | +4.04% | 3B | -37.32 | -$1.31 | N/A |
| CHEF | $65.82 | +4.51% | 2.7B | 39.18 | $1.68 | N/A |
| ANDE | $72.11 | +1.55% | 2.5B | 25.85 | $2.79 | +1.10% |
| AVO | $14.29 | +3.70% | 1B | 31.07 | $0.46 | N/A |
| SPTN | $26.90 | +0.00% | 910.9M | -57.23 | -$0.47 | +1.64% |
| CVGW | $27.17 | +1.87% | 485.6M | 30.19 | $0.90 | +2.93% |
Stock Comparison
WFM vs SYY Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, SYY has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while SYY trades at $76.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYY's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYY's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to SYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check SYY's competition here
WFM vs USFD Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, USFD has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while USFD trades at $93.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USFD's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to USFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check USFD's competition here
WFM vs PFGC Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, PFGC has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while PFGC trades at $93.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFGC's P/E ratio is 42.30. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFGC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to PFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check PFGC's competition here
WFM vs UNFI Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, UNFI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while UNFI trades at $48.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNFI's P/E ratio is -37.32. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNFI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to UNFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check UNFI's competition here
WFM vs CHEF Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, CHEF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while CHEF trades at $65.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHEF's P/E ratio is 39.18. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to CHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check CHEF's competition here
WFM vs ANDE Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, ANDE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while ANDE trades at $72.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANDE's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANDE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to ANDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check ANDE's competition here
WFM vs AVO Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, AVO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while AVO trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVO's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to AVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check AVO's competition here
WFM vs SPTN Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, SPTN has a market cap of 910.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while SPTN trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTN's P/E ratio is -57.23. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPTN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is more volatile compared to SPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check SPTN's competition here
WFM vs CVGW Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, CVGW has a market cap of 485.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while CVGW trades at $27.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVGW's P/E ratio is 30.19. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVGW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to CVGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check CVGW's competition here
WFM vs WILC Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, WILC has a market cap of 411.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while WILC trades at $29.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WILC's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WILC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to WILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check WILC's competition here
WFM vs HFFG Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, HFFG has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while HFFG trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HFFG's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HFFG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to HFFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check HFFG's competition here
WFM vs DIT Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, DIT has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while DIT trades at $95.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIT's P/E ratio is 88.51. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is more volatile compared to DIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check DIT's competition here
WFM vs CCHH Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, CCHH has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while CCHH trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCHH's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCHH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to CCHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check CCHH's competition here
WFM vs TWG Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, TWG has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while TWG trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWG's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to TWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check TWG's competition here
WFM vs VSTD Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, VSTD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while VSTD trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSTD's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VSTD's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to VSTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check VSTD's competition here
WFM vs SVU Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, SVU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while SVU trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is more volatile compared to SVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check SVU's competition here
WFM vs GLDC Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, GLDC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while GLDC trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLDC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to GLDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check GLDC's competition here