Whole Foods Market, Inc.
Whole Foods Market, Inc. (WFM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WFM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFM | $41.99 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SYY | $72.11 | -12.74% | 39.2B | 22.04 | $3.71 | +2.60% |
| USFD | $91.88 | -0.24% | 20.3B | 30.90 | $2.94 | N/A |
| PFGC | $85.43 | +0.40% | 13B | 37.56 | $2.21 | N/A |
| UNFI | $45.61 | +1.09% | 2.8B | -35.06 | -$1.31 | N/A |
| ANDE | $71.65 | -0.48% | 2.5B | 26.23 | $2.79 | +1.08% |
| CHEF | $59.69 | -1.27% | 2.4B | 35.43 | $1.68 | N/A |
| AVO | $13.89 | +2.13% | 988.3M | 30.33 | $0.46 | N/A |
| SPTN | $26.90 | +0.00% | 910.9M | -57.23 | -$0.47 | +1.64% |
| CVGW | $26.18 | -0.34% | 471.5M | 29.31 | $0.90 | +3.03% |
Stock Comparison
WFM vs SYY Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, SYY has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while SYY trades at $72.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYY's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYY's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to SYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check SYY's competition here
WFM vs USFD Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, USFD has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while USFD trades at $91.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USFD's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to USFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check USFD's competition here
WFM vs PFGC Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, PFGC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while PFGC trades at $85.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFGC's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFGC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to PFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check PFGC's competition here
WFM vs UNFI Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, UNFI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while UNFI trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNFI's P/E ratio is -35.06. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNFI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to UNFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check UNFI's competition here
WFM vs ANDE Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, ANDE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while ANDE trades at $71.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANDE's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANDE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to ANDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check ANDE's competition here
WFM vs CHEF Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, CHEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while CHEF trades at $59.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHEF's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to CHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check CHEF's competition here
WFM vs AVO Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, AVO has a market cap of 988.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while AVO trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVO's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to AVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check AVO's competition here
WFM vs SPTN Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, SPTN has a market cap of 910.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while SPTN trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTN's P/E ratio is -57.23. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPTN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is more volatile compared to SPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check SPTN's competition here
WFM vs CVGW Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, CVGW has a market cap of 471.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while CVGW trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVGW's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVGW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to CVGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check CVGW's competition here
WFM vs WILC Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, WILC has a market cap of 348.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while WILC trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WILC's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WILC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to WILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check WILC's competition here
WFM vs HFFG Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, HFFG has a market cap of 91.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while HFFG trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HFFG's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HFFG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to HFFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check HFFG's competition here
WFM vs DIT Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, DIT has a market cap of 87.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while DIT trades at $86.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIT's P/E ratio is 82.16. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to DIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check DIT's competition here
WFM vs CCHH Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, CCHH has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while CCHH trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCHH's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCHH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to CCHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check CCHH's competition here
WFM vs TWG Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, TWG has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while TWG trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWG's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to TWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check TWG's competition here
WFM vs VSTD Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, VSTD has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while VSTD trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSTD's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VSTD's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to VSTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check VSTD's competition here
WFM vs GLDC Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, GLDC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while GLDC trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLDC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is less volatile compared to GLDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check GLDC's competition here
WFM vs SVU Comparison April 2026
WFM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFM stands at 0. In comparison, SVU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFM is priced at $41.99, while SVU trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFM is more volatile compared to SVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFM.Check SVU's competition here