Wellfield Technologies Inc.
Wellfield Technologies Inc. (WFLD.V) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WFLD.V) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFLD.V | CA$0.02 | +0.00% | 2.8M | -0.10 | -CA$0.15 | N/A |
| CRM.NE | CA$21.15 | +0.91% | 350.9B | 41.47 | CA$0.51 | +0.61% |
| SHOP.TO | CA$170.62 | +2.46% | 221.8B | 101.56 | CA$1.68 | N/A |
| CSU.TO | CA$4,890.29 | +0.92% | 103.6B | 102.98 | CA$47.49 | +0.11% |
| CDAY.TO | CA$93.38 | +0.38% | 14.6B | 2334.50 | CA$0.04 | N/A |
| DSG.TO | CA$147.48 | +1.58% | 12.7B | 65.55 | CA$2.25 | N/A |
| OTEX.TO | CA$42.08 | +2.14% | 10.9B | 12.60 | CA$3.34 | +3.45% |
| KXS.TO | CA$208.47 | +2.04% | 5.9B | 443.55 | CA$0.47 | N/A |
| LSPD.TO | CA$18.76 | +4.75% | 2.6B | -3.18 | -CA$5.90 | N/A |
| MAGT.TO | CA$44.24 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 368.67 | CA$0.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WFLD.V vs CRM.NE Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, CRM.NE has a market cap of 350.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while CRM.NE trades at CA$21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CRM.NE's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to CRM.NE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to CRM.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check CRM.NE's competition here
WFLD.V vs SHOP.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, SHOP.TO has a market cap of 221.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while SHOP.TO trades at CA$170.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SHOP.TO's P/E ratio is 101.56. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to SHOP.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to SHOP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check SHOP.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs CSU.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, CSU.TO has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while CSU.TO trades at CA$4,890.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CSU.TO's P/E ratio is 102.98. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to CSU.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to CSU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check CSU.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs CDAY.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, CDAY.TO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while CDAY.TO trades at CA$93.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CDAY.TO's P/E ratio is 2334.50. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to CDAY.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to CDAY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check CDAY.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs DSG.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, DSG.TO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while DSG.TO trades at CA$147.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DSG.TO's P/E ratio is 65.55. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to DSG.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to DSG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check DSG.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs OTEX.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, OTEX.TO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while OTEX.TO trades at CA$42.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas OTEX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to OTEX.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to OTEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check OTEX.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs KXS.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, KXS.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while KXS.TO trades at CA$208.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KXS.TO's P/E ratio is 443.55. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to KXS.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to KXS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check KXS.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs LSPD.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, LSPD.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while LSPD.TO trades at CA$18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LSPD.TO's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to LSPD.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to LSPD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check LSPD.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs MAGT.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MAGT.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while MAGT.TO trades at CA$44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MAGT.TO's P/E ratio is 368.67. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to MAGT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to MAGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check MAGT.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs ENGH.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ENGH.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while ENGH.TO trades at CA$23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ENGH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to ENGH.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to ENGH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check ENGH.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs DCBO.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, DCBO.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while DCBO.TO trades at CA$43.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DCBO.TO's P/E ratio is 42.69. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to DCBO.TO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to DCBO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check DCBO.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs ABST.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ABST.TO has a market cap of 808M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while ABST.TO trades at CA$15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ABST.TO's P/E ratio is -23.03. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to ABST.TO's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to ABST.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check ABST.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs CMG.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, CMG.TO has a market cap of 661.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while CMG.TO trades at CA$8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CMG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to CMG.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to CMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check CMG.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs TCS.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, TCS.TO has a market cap of 549M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while TCS.TO trades at CA$37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TCS.TO's P/E ratio is 123.33. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to TCS.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to TCS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check TCS.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs BLN.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, BLN.TO has a market cap of 534.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while BLN.TO trades at CA$6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BLN.TO's P/E ratio is -70.44. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to BLN.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to BLN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check BLN.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs ABXX.NE Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ABXX.NE has a market cap of 400.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while ABXX.NE trades at CA$12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ABXX.NE's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to ABXX.NE's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to ABXX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check ABXX.NE's competition here
WFLD.V vs REAL.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, REAL.TO has a market cap of 399.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while REAL.TO trades at CA$5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas REAL.TO's P/E ratio is 179.67. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to REAL.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to REAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check REAL.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs QFOR.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, QFOR.TO has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while QFOR.TO trades at CA$6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas QFOR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to QFOR.TO's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to QFOR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check QFOR.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs WNDR.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, WNDR.TO has a market cap of 234.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while WNDR.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas WNDR.TO's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to WNDR.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to WNDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check WNDR.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs SYZ.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, SYZ.TO has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while SYZ.TO trades at CA$9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SYZ.TO's P/E ratio is -196.20. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to SYZ.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to SYZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check SYZ.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs IMP.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, IMP.TO has a market cap of 188.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while IMP.TO trades at CA$3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IMP.TO's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to IMP.TO's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to IMP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check IMP.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs EINC.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, EINC.TO has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while EINC.TO trades at CA$3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas EINC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to EINC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to EINC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check EINC.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs THNC.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, THNC.TO has a market cap of 149.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while THNC.TO trades at CA$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas THNC.TO's P/E ratio is 73.33. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to THNC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to THNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check THNC.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs URL.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, URL.CN has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while URL.CN trades at CA$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas URL.CN's P/E ratio is 129.00. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to URL.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to URL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check URL.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs XTRA.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, XTRA.TO has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while XTRA.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas XTRA.TO's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to XTRA.TO's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to XTRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check XTRA.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs MVP.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MVP.TO has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while MVP.TO trades at CA$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MVP.TO's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to MVP.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to MVP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check MVP.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs TONY.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, TONY.CN has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while TONY.CN trades at CA$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TONY.CN's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to TONY.CN's ROE of -3.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to TONY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check TONY.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs AXCP.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, AXCP.CN has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while AXCP.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AXCP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to AXCP.CN's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to AXCP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check AXCP.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs LGIQ.NE Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, LGIQ.NE has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while LGIQ.NE trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LGIQ.NE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to LGIQ.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to LGIQ.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check LGIQ.NE's competition here
WFLD.V vs TWOH.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, TWOH.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while TWOH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TWOH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to TWOH.CN's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and TWOH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TWOH.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs BLOX.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, BLOX.CN has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while BLOX.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BLOX.CN's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to BLOX.CN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and BLOX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLOX.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs SKUR.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, SKUR.CN has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while SKUR.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SKUR.CN's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to SKUR.CN's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and SKUR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKUR.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs LSPK.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, LSPK.TO has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while LSPK.TO trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LSPK.TO's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to LSPK.TO's ROE of -7.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to LSPK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check LSPK.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs ADCO.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ADCO.TO has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while ADCO.TO trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ADCO.TO's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to ADCO.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and ADCO.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADCO.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs BNSL.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, BNSL.CN has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while BNSL.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BNSL.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to BNSL.CN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WFLD.V has daily volatility of 0.00 and BNSL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check BNSL.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs HP.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, HP.CN has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while HP.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HP.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to HP.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and HP.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HP.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs FDGE.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, FDGE.TO has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while FDGE.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FDGE.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to FDGE.TO's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and FDGE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDGE.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs IGN.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, IGN.CN has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while IGN.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IGN.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to IGN.CN's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and IGN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IGN.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs VQS.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, VQS.TO has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while VQS.TO trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VQS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to VQS.TO's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and VQS.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VQS.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs SPO.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, SPO.CN has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while SPO.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SPO.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to SPO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and SPO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPO.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs CNI.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, CNI.CN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while CNI.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CNI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to CNI.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to CNI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check CNI.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs EGTI.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, EGTI.CN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while EGTI.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas EGTI.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to EGTI.CN's ROE of +13.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and EGTI.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGTI.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs IAI.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, IAI.CN has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while IAI.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IAI.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to IAI.CN's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and IAI.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAI.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs ISFT.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ISFT.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while ISFT.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ISFT.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to ISFT.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to ISFT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check ISFT.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs BYFM.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, BYFM.CN has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while BYFM.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BYFM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to BYFM.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and BYFM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYFM.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs VSBY.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, VSBY.CN has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while VSBY.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VSBY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to VSBY.CN's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to VSBY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check VSBY.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs MWRK.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MWRK.CN has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while MWRK.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MWRK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to MWRK.CN's ROE of -3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to MWRK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check MWRK.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs LIQD.NE Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, LIQD.NE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while LIQD.NE trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LIQD.NE's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to LIQD.NE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and LIQD.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIQD.NE's competition here
WFLD.V vs LUXX.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, LUXX.CN has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while LUXX.CN trades at CA$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LUXX.CN's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to LUXX.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to LUXX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check LUXX.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs LQID.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, LQID.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while LQID.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to LQID.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and LQID.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LQID.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs GBMC.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, GBMC.CN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while GBMC.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GBMC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to GBMC.CN's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and GBMC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBMC.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs CK.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, CK.CN has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while CK.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CK.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to CK.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and CK.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CK.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs WHIP.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, WHIP.CN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while WHIP.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas WHIP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to WHIP.CN's ROE of +73.91%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and WHIP.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WHIP.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs KASH.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, KASH.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while KASH.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KASH.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to KASH.CN's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and KASH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KASH.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs XRA.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, XRA.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while XRA.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas XRA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to XRA.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to XRA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check XRA.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs GBLC.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, GBLC.CN has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while GBLC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GBLC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to GBLC.CN's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to GBLC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check GBLC.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs ARWY.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ARWY.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while ARWY.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ARWY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to ARWY.CN's ROE of +5.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to ARWY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check ARWY.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs EMPH.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, EMPH.CN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while EMPH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas EMPH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to EMPH.CN's ROE of +3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and EMPH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMPH.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs PLNK.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, PLNK.CN has a market cap of 887K. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while PLNK.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PLNK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to PLNK.CN's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and PLNK.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLNK.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs PPK.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, PPK.CN has a market cap of 828K. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while PPK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PPK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to PPK.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and PPK.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPK.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs FDM.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, FDM.CN has a market cap of 821.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while FDM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FDM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to FDM.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and FDM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDM.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs PUSH.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, PUSH.CN has a market cap of 808.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while PUSH.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PUSH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to PUSH.CN's ROE of -10.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WFLD.V has daily volatility of 0.00 and PUSH.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check PUSH.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs TTT.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, TTT.CN has a market cap of 763.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while TTT.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TTT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to TTT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and TTT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTT.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs SOLV.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, SOLV.CN has a market cap of 762.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while SOLV.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SOLV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to SOLV.CN's ROE of -47.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to SOLV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check SOLV.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs GEMS.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, GEMS.CN has a market cap of 669K. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while GEMS.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GEMS.CN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to GEMS.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and GEMS.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEMS.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs XIGM.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, XIGM.CN has a market cap of 650.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while XIGM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas XIGM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to XIGM.CN's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and XIGM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XIGM.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs DVN.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, DVN.CN has a market cap of 604.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while DVN.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to DVN.CN's ROE of +3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and DVN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVN.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs ZEU.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ZEU.CN has a market cap of 410.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while ZEU.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ZEU.CN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to ZEU.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and ZEU.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZEU.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs COYX.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, COYX.CN has a market cap of 388.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while COYX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas COYX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to COYX.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and COYX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COYX.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs RAD.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, RAD.CN has a market cap of 278.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while RAD.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RAD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to RAD.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and RAD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RAD.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs XCT.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, XCT.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while XCT.TO trades at CA$3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas XCT.TO's P/E ratio is -55.36. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to XCT.TO's ROE of +20.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to XCT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check XCT.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs SWIS.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, SWIS.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while SWIS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SWIS.CN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to SWIS.CN's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WFLD.V has daily volatility of 0.00 and SWIS.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check SWIS.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs LWRK.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, LWRK.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while LWRK.TO trades at CA$32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LWRK.TO's P/E ratio is 87.22. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to LWRK.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to LWRK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check LWRK.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs VOYG.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, VOYG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while VOYG.TO trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VOYG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to VOYG.TO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to VOYG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check VOYG.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs TSF.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, TSF.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while TSF.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TSF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to TSF.CN's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WFLD.V has daily volatility of 0.00 and TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check TSF.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs LNK.CN Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, LNK.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while LNK.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LNK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to LNK.CN's ROE of +3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WFLD.V has daily volatility of 0.00 and LNK.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check LNK.CN's competition here
WFLD.V vs NXJ.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, NXJ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while NXJ.TO trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NXJ.TO's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to NXJ.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V and NXJ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXJ.TO's competition here
WFLD.V vs PAT.TO Comparison July 2025
WFLD.V plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFLD.V stands at 2.8M. In comparison, PAT.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFLD.V is priced at CA$0.02, while PAT.TO trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFLD.V currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PAT.TO's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, WFLD.V's ROE is +4.40%, compared to PAT.TO's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFLD.V is less volatile compared to PAT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFLD.V.Check PAT.TO's competition here