Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi MSCI World Energy

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €352.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check 0P00000MO4.F's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €305.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check 0P00000W6B.F's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at €287.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check 0P00001QSE.F's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 187.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while BBN1.F trades at €154.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 48.77. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check BBN1.F's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check BLQA.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 116.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while ZPDW.DE trades at €75.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check ZPDW.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IWLE.DE has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IWLE.DE trades at €9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IWLE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWLE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to IWLE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IWLE.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while SXR8.DE trades at €592.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check SXR8.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 100.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EUNL.DE trades at €104.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EUNL.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while U1FB.DE trades at €24.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check U1FB.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while VUAA.DE trades at €106.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check VUAA.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while VUSA.DE trades at €105.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check VUSA.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while SXRZ.DE trades at €240.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check SXRZ.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while D500.DE trades at €51.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check D500.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while P500.DE trades at €1,102.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check P500.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XJSE.DE trades at €6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XJSE.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while E500.DE trades at €49.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check E500.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while VGWL.DE trades at €133.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check VGWL.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while VWCE.DE trades at €135.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check VWCE.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check VGWL.F's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while A4S.DE trades at €275.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check A4S.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while SPPE.DE trades at €15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check SPPE.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,103.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while AW1Q.DE trades at €17.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check AW1Q.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while SPY5.DE trades at €555.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check SPY5.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IBC3.F trades at €4.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IBC3.F's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IS3N.DE trades at €34.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IS3N.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IBC3.DE trades at €4.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IBC3.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, CBUC.DE has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while CBUC.DE trades at €6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas CBUC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUC.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to CBUC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check CBUC.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, NQSE.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while NQSE.DE trades at €13.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas NQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NQSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to NQSE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check NQSE.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while LYPS.DE trades at €57.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check LYPS.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while 6TVM.DE trades at €57.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check 6TVM.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while PPFB.SG trades at €55.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check PPFB.SG's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while TR1.DU trades at €90.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check TR1.DU's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while LYP2.DE trades at €314.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check LYP2.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XDWL.DE trades at €96.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XDWL.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XDWD.DE trades at €114.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XDWD.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EDMU.DE trades at €10.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EDMU.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while OM3L.DE trades at €9.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check OM3L.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,166.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check SXRV.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IUSA.DE trades at €55.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IUSA.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IUSZ.DE trades at €10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IUSZ.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EUN5.DE trades at €120.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EUN5.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EQQQ.DE trades at €497.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EQQQ.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IUSQ.DE trades at €86.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IUSQ.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, SLUS.DE has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while SLUS.DE trades at €10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas SLUS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLUS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to SLUS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check SLUS.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while SGAS.DE trades at €11.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE and SGAS.DE have similar daily volatility (0.87).Check SGAS.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while JUHE.DE trades at €50.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check JUHE.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while SPPW.DE trades at €38.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check SPPW.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while JRUD.DE trades at €51.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check JRUD.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while JREU.DE trades at €55.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE and JREU.DE have similar daily volatility (0.87).Check JREU.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while DWS.DE trades at €52.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check DWS.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while 2B7K.DE trades at €11.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check 2B7K.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IQQY.DE trades at €34.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IQQY.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €9.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XD9U.DE trades at €163.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XD9U.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XD9D.DE trades at €21.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XD9D.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XD9E.DE trades at €129.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XD9E.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while QDVE.DE trades at €33.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check QDVE.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EUNK.DE trades at €86.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EUNK.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EGV2.DE trades at €102.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EGV2.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XDEW.DE trades at €89.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XDEW.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €35.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check H4ZJ.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €35.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IE00B4X9L533.SG's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XDEE.DE trades at €10.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XDEE.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while LYYA.DE trades at €357.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check LYYA.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while D5BM.DE trades at €111.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check D5BM.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while STXH.DE trades at €142.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check STXH.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XS5E.DE trades at €9.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XS5E.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EXS1.DE trades at €201.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EXS1.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EXIC.DE trades at €7.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EXIC.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, 2B7J.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while 2B7J.DE trades at €8.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas 2B7J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to 2B7J.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check 2B7J.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while LYP6.DE trades at €263.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check LYP6.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EXIE.DE trades at €6.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EXIE.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EXSA.DE trades at €54.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EXSA.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at €66.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check 0P00000SUJ.F's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, CBUE.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while CBUE.DE trades at €4.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas CBUE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to CBUE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check CBUE.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while VGVE.DE trades at €103.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check VGVE.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while VGVF.DE trades at €107.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check VGVF.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EXW1.DE trades at €54.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EXW1.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while DBXW.DE trades at €112.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check DBXW.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XWEH.DE trades at €44.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XWEH.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EUNW.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EUNW.DE trades at €94.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EUNW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to EUNW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EUNW.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XZMU.DE trades at €60.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XZMU.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IQQW.DE trades at €76.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IQQW.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while DBXE.DE trades at €57.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check DBXE.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, SXR7.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while SXR7.DE trades at €203.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas SXR7.DE's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to SXR7.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check SXR7.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while VGWD.DE trades at €65.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check VGWD.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while SPP1.DE trades at €22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check SPP1.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while H4ZF.DE trades at €56.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check H4ZF.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at €56.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check IE00B5KQNG97.SG's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while LCUW.DE trades at €19.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check LCUW.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while EXIC.F trades at €4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check EXIC.F's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XZW0.DE trades at €41.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XZW0.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while DBXD.DE trades at €227.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check DBXD.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XMME.DE trades at €58.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XMME.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while TCC4.DE trades at €225.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check TCC4.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, DECR.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while DECR.DE trades at €47.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas DECR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DECR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to DECR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check DECR.DE's competition here

WDNR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDNR.DE stands at 32.5M. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDNR.DE is priced at €338.00, while XMME.F trades at €46.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDNR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.45, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDNR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDNR.DE is more volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDNR.DE.Check XMME.F's competition here