Vinyoflex Limited (VINYOFL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VINYOFL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Specialties Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VINYOFL.BO | ₹54.12 | +2.09% | 233.7M | 7.28 | ₹7.43 | N/A |
| GVT&D.NS | ₹5,533.50 | +5.40% | 1.4T | 114.71 | ₹48.24 | +0.09% |
| KAMAHOLD.BO | ₹2,637.30 | +1.20% | 84.6B | 9.09 | ₹290.08 | +1.57% |
| ELANTAS.BO | ₹10,636.90 | +1.30% | 84.3B | 57.66 | ₹184.49 | +0.07% |
| TINNARUBR.BO | ₹889.90 | +0.91% | 16B | 30.03 | ₹29.63 | +0.45% |
| INDOKEM.BO | ₹500.00 | +0.81% | 13.9B | 735.29 | ₹0.68 | N/A |
| JYOTIRES.BO | ₹1,012.65 | +0.16% | 12.2B | 17.54 | ₹58.03 | +0.89% |
| KELENRG.BO | ₹6,029.30 | +5.00% | 6B | 21.03 | ₹286.68 | +0.02% |
| VIPULORG.BO | ₹260.00 | +0.42% | 5B | 67.53 | ₹3.85 | +0.31% |
| RUBFILA.BO | ₹71.75 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 14.26 | ₹5.03 | +2.79% |
Stock Comparison
VINYOFL.BO vs GVT&D.NS Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, GVT&D.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while GVT&D.NS trades at ₹5,533.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas GVT&D.NS's P/E ratio is 114.71. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GVT&D.NS's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to GVT&D.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check GVT&D.NS's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs KAMAHOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, KAMAHOLD.BO has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while KAMAHOLD.BO trades at ₹2,637.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas KAMAHOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KAMAHOLD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to KAMAHOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check KAMAHOLD.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs ELANTAS.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, ELANTAS.BO has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while ELANTAS.BO trades at ₹10,636.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas ELANTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 57.66. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELANTAS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to ELANTAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check ELANTAS.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs TINNARUBR.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, TINNARUBR.BO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while TINNARUBR.BO trades at ₹889.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas TINNARUBR.BO's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TINNARUBR.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to TINNARUBR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check TINNARUBR.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs INDOKEM.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, INDOKEM.BO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while INDOKEM.BO trades at ₹500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas INDOKEM.BO's P/E ratio is 735.29. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOKEM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOKEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check INDOKEM.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs JYOTIRES.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, JYOTIRES.BO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while JYOTIRES.BO trades at ₹1,012.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas JYOTIRES.BO's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JYOTIRES.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to JYOTIRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check JYOTIRES.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs KELENRG.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, KELENRG.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while KELENRG.BO trades at ₹6,029.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas KELENRG.BO's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KELENRG.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to KELENRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check KELENRG.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs VIPULORG.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, VIPULORG.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while VIPULORG.BO trades at ₹260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas VIPULORG.BO's P/E ratio is 67.53. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIPULORG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to VIPULORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check VIPULORG.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs RUBFILA.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, RUBFILA.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while RUBFILA.BO trades at ₹71.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas RUBFILA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RUBFILA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to RUBFILA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check RUBFILA.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs NIKHILAD.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, NIKHILAD.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while NIKHILAD.BO trades at ₹79.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas NIKHILAD.BO's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIKHILAD.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to NIKHILAD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check NIKHILAD.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs WAAREE.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, WAAREE.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while WAAREE.BO trades at ₹265.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas WAAREE.BO's P/E ratio is -68.53. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WAAREE.BO's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to WAAREE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check WAAREE.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs INNOVATORS.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, INNOVATORS.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while INNOVATORS.BO trades at ₹124.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas INNOVATORS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INNOVATORS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to INNOVATORS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check INNOVATORS.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs MULTIBASE.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, MULTIBASE.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while MULTIBASE.BO trades at ₹178.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas MULTIBASE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MULTIBASE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to MULTIBASE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check MULTIBASE.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs DHINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, DHINDIA.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while DHINDIA.BO trades at ₹265.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas DHINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to DHINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check DHINDIA.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs CDG.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, CDG.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while CDG.BO trades at ₹233.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas CDG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDG.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to CDG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check CDG.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs KESARPE.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, KESARPE.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while KESARPE.BO trades at ₹17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas KESARPE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KESARPE.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to KESARPE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check KESARPE.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs HINDADH.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, HINDADH.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while HINDADH.BO trades at ₹307.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas HINDADH.BO's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HINDADH.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to HINDADH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check HINDADH.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs BRIGHTBR.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, BRIGHTBR.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while BRIGHTBR.BO trades at ₹230.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas BRIGHTBR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRIGHTBR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to BRIGHTBR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check BRIGHTBR.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs GMPL.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, GMPL.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while GMPL.BO trades at ₹74.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas GMPL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GMPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to GMPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check GMPL.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs HARDCAS.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, HARDCAS.BO has a market cap of 734.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while HARDCAS.BO trades at ₹846.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas HARDCAS.BO's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HARDCAS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to HARDCAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check HARDCAS.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs RETINA.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, RETINA.BO has a market cap of 668.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while RETINA.BO trades at ₹43.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas RETINA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.04. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RETINA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to RETINA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check RETINA.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs SHREYASI.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, SHREYASI.BO has a market cap of 453.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while SHREYASI.BO trades at ₹6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas SHREYASI.BO's P/E ratio is -35.56. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHREYASI.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to SHREYASI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check SHREYASI.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs MMRUBBR-B.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, MMRUBBR-B.BO has a market cap of 405M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while MMRUBBR-B.BO trades at ₹64.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas MMRUBBR-B.BO's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MMRUBBR-B.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to MMRUBBR-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check MMRUBBR-B.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs AXELPOLY.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, AXELPOLY.BO has a market cap of 395.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while AXELPOLY.BO trades at ₹42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas AXELPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -35.09. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXELPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to AXELPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check AXELPOLY.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs DYNAMIND.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, DYNAMIND.BO has a market cap of 327.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while DYNAMIND.BO trades at ₹108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas DYNAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DYNAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to DYNAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check DYNAMIND.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs CFL.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, CFL.BO has a market cap of 326.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while CFL.BO trades at ₹53.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas CFL.BO's P/E ratio is -213.44. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to CFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check CFL.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs DUROPACK.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, DUROPACK.BO has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while DUROPACK.BO trades at ₹58.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas DUROPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUROPACK.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to DUROPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check DUROPACK.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs YUG.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, YUG.BO has a market cap of 258.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while YUG.BO trades at ₹24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas YUG.BO's P/E ratio is 495.00. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YUG.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to YUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check YUG.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs ADVPETR-B.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, ADVPETR-B.BO has a market cap of 243.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while ADVPETR-B.BO trades at ₹270.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas ADVPETR-B.BO's P/E ratio is 820.30. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADVPETR-B.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to ADVPETR-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check ADVPETR-B.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs ORGCOAT.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, ORGCOAT.BO has a market cap of 204.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while ORGCOAT.BO trades at ₹20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas ORGCOAT.BO's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORGCOAT.BO's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to ORGCOAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check ORGCOAT.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs VIVIDIND.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, VIVIDIND.BO has a market cap of 198.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while VIVIDIND.BO trades at ₹21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas VIVIDIND.BO's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIVIDIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to VIVIDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check VIVIDIND.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs SAMYAKINT.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, SAMYAKINT.BO has a market cap of 148.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while SAMYAKINT.BO trades at ₹18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas SAMYAKINT.BO's P/E ratio is 59.94. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAMYAKINT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to SAMYAKINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check SAMYAKINT.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs MITSHI.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, MITSHI.BO has a market cap of 127.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while MITSHI.BO trades at ₹14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas MITSHI.BO's P/E ratio is 1449.00. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITSHI.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to MITSHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check MITSHI.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs UNQTYMI.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, UNQTYMI.BO has a market cap of 114.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while UNQTYMI.BO trades at ₹16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas UNQTYMI.BO's P/E ratio is -330.00. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNQTYMI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to UNQTYMI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check UNQTYMI.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs GAGAN.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, GAGAN.BO has a market cap of 94.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while GAGAN.BO trades at ₹21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas GAGAN.BO's P/E ratio is 67.74. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GAGAN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to GAGAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check GAGAN.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs TRIVENIGQ.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, TRIVENIGQ.BO has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while TRIVENIGQ.BO trades at ₹6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas TRIVENIGQ.BO's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRIVENIGQ.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to TRIVENIGQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check TRIVENIGQ.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs BPTEX.BO Comparison June 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 233.7M. In comparison, BPTEX.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹54.12, while BPTEX.BO trades at ₹53.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.28, whereas BPTEX.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BPTEX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to BPTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check BPTEX.BO's competition here