Vinyoflex Limited
Vinyoflex Limited (VINYOFL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VINYOFL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Specialties Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VINYOFL.BO | ₹51.50 | +6.19% | 217.6M | 8.45 | ₹5.96 | N/A |
| KAMAHOLD.BO | ₹2,690.00 | -0.06% | 86.4B | 9.58 | ₹280.99 | +1.34% |
| ELANTAS.BO | ₹9,120.15 | +1.17% | 71.7B | 51.99 | ₹173.98 | +0.08% |
| INDOKEM.BO | ₹545.00 | -1.92% | 14.7B | 279.31 | ₹1.89 | N/A |
| TINNARUBR.BO | ₹718.95 | -0.95% | 12.9B | 26.32 | ₹27.22 | +0.56% |
| JYOTIRES.BO | ₹839.00 | +0.95% | 10.2B | 14.52 | ₹58.57 | +1.06% |
| VIPULORG.BO | ₹208.30 | +2.81% | 3.7B | 63.96 | ₹3.28 | +0.38% |
| RUBFILA.BO | ₹65.21 | -0.64% | 3.6B | 11.49 | ₹5.70 | +3.05% |
| KELENRG.BO | ₹3,140.00 | -4.71% | 3.2B | 11.78 | ₹271.06 | +0.05% |
| INNOVATORS.BO | ₹156.00 | -7.56% | 3.1B | 24.09 | ₹6.85 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VINYOFL.BO vs KAMAHOLD.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, KAMAHOLD.BO has a market cap of 86.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while KAMAHOLD.BO trades at ₹2,690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas KAMAHOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KAMAHOLD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to KAMAHOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check KAMAHOLD.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs ELANTAS.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, ELANTAS.BO has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while ELANTAS.BO trades at ₹9,120.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas ELANTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 51.99. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELANTAS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to ELANTAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check ELANTAS.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs INDOKEM.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, INDOKEM.BO has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while INDOKEM.BO trades at ₹545.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas INDOKEM.BO's P/E ratio is 279.31. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDOKEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOKEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check INDOKEM.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs TINNARUBR.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, TINNARUBR.BO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while TINNARUBR.BO trades at ₹718.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas TINNARUBR.BO's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TINNARUBR.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to TINNARUBR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check TINNARUBR.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs JYOTIRES.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, JYOTIRES.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while JYOTIRES.BO trades at ₹839.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas JYOTIRES.BO's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JYOTIRES.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to JYOTIRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check JYOTIRES.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs VIPULORG.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, VIPULORG.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while VIPULORG.BO trades at ₹208.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas VIPULORG.BO's P/E ratio is 63.96. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIPULORG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to VIPULORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check VIPULORG.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs RUBFILA.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, RUBFILA.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while RUBFILA.BO trades at ₹65.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas RUBFILA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUBFILA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to RUBFILA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check RUBFILA.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs KELENRG.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, KELENRG.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while KELENRG.BO trades at ₹3,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas KELENRG.BO's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KELENRG.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to KELENRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check KELENRG.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs INNOVATORS.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, INNOVATORS.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while INNOVATORS.BO trades at ₹156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas INNOVATORS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INNOVATORS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to INNOVATORS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check INNOVATORS.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs NIKHILAD.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, NIKHILAD.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while NIKHILAD.BO trades at ₹61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas NIKHILAD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NIKHILAD.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to NIKHILAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check NIKHILAD.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs MULTIBASE.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, MULTIBASE.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while MULTIBASE.BO trades at ₹197.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas MULTIBASE.BO's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MULTIBASE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to MULTIBASE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check MULTIBASE.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs KESARPE.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, KESARPE.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while KESARPE.BO trades at ₹23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas KESARPE.BO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KESARPE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to KESARPE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check KESARPE.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs WAAREE.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, WAAREE.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while WAAREE.BO trades at ₹162.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas WAAREE.BO's P/E ratio is -37.24. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WAAREE.BO's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to WAAREE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check WAAREE.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs HINDADH.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, HINDADH.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while HINDADH.BO trades at ₹304.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas HINDADH.BO's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINDADH.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to HINDADH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check HINDADH.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs DHINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, DHINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while DHINDIA.BO trades at ₹141.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas DHINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DHINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to DHINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check DHINDIA.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs BRIGHTBR.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, BRIGHTBR.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while BRIGHTBR.BO trades at ₹207.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas BRIGHTBR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRIGHTBR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to BRIGHTBR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check BRIGHTBR.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs CDG.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, CDG.BO has a market cap of 961.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while CDG.BO trades at ₹102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas CDG.BO's P/E ratio is 62.34. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDG.BO's ROE of +10.66%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to CDG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check CDG.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs GMPL.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, GMPL.BO has a market cap of 928.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while GMPL.BO trades at ₹69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas GMPL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to GMPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check GMPL.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs RETINA.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, RETINA.BO has a market cap of 833.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while RETINA.BO trades at ₹54.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas RETINA.BO's P/E ratio is 74.45. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RETINA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to RETINA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check RETINA.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs HARDCAS.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, HARDCAS.BO has a market cap of 616.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while HARDCAS.BO trades at ₹702.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas HARDCAS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HARDCAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to HARDCAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check HARDCAS.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs SHREYASI.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, SHREYASI.BO has a market cap of 506.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while SHREYASI.BO trades at ₹7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas SHREYASI.BO's P/E ratio is -42.06. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHREYASI.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to SHREYASI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check SHREYASI.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs MMRUBBR-B.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, MMRUBBR-B.BO has a market cap of 430.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while MMRUBBR-B.BO trades at ₹64.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas MMRUBBR-B.BO's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MMRUBBR-B.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to MMRUBBR-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check MMRUBBR-B.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs AXELPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, AXELPOLY.BO has a market cap of 387.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while AXELPOLY.BO trades at ₹45.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas AXELPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXELPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to AXELPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check AXELPOLY.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs DYNAMIND.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, DYNAMIND.BO has a market cap of 300.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while DYNAMIND.BO trades at ₹97.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas DYNAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DYNAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to DYNAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check DYNAMIND.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs DUROPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, DUROPACK.BO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while DUROPACK.BO trades at ₹56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas DUROPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DUROPACK.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to DUROPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check DUROPACK.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs CFL.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, CFL.BO has a market cap of 278.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while CFL.BO trades at ₹46.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas CFL.BO's P/E ratio is -240.11. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFL.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to CFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check CFL.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs ORGCOAT.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, ORGCOAT.BO has a market cap of 211M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while ORGCOAT.BO trades at ₹20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas ORGCOAT.BO's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORGCOAT.BO's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to ORGCOAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check ORGCOAT.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs YUG.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, YUG.BO has a market cap of 174.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while YUG.BO trades at ₹16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas YUG.BO's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YUG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to YUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check YUG.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs VIVIDIND.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, VIVIDIND.BO has a market cap of 172M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while VIVIDIND.BO trades at ₹19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas VIVIDIND.BO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIVIDIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to VIVIDIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check VIVIDIND.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs SAMYAKINT.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, SAMYAKINT.BO has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while SAMYAKINT.BO trades at ₹16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas SAMYAKINT.BO's P/E ratio is -18.51. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAMYAKINT.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to SAMYAKINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check SAMYAKINT.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs MITSHI.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, MITSHI.BO has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while MITSHI.BO trades at ₹14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas MITSHI.BO's P/E ratio is 480.00. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MITSHI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to MITSHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check MITSHI.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs UNQTYMI.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, UNQTYMI.BO has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while UNQTYMI.BO trades at ₹15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas UNQTYMI.BO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNQTYMI.BO's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to UNQTYMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check UNQTYMI.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs TRIVENIGQ.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, TRIVENIGQ.BO has a market cap of 99.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while TRIVENIGQ.BO trades at ₹7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas TRIVENIGQ.BO's P/E ratio is -52.33. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRIVENIGQ.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to TRIVENIGQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check TRIVENIGQ.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs ADVPETR-B.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, ADVPETR-B.BO has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while ADVPETR-B.BO trades at ₹107.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas ADVPETR-B.BO's P/E ratio is 193.68. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADVPETR-B.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to ADVPETR-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check ADVPETR-B.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs GAGAN.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, GAGAN.BO has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while GAGAN.BO trades at ₹20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas GAGAN.BO's P/E ratio is 77.12. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GAGAN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is less volatile compared to GAGAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check GAGAN.BO's competition here
VINYOFL.BO vs BPTEX.BO Comparison February 2026
VINYOFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VINYOFL.BO stands at 217.6M. In comparison, BPTEX.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VINYOFL.BO is priced at ₹51.50, while BPTEX.BO trades at ₹53.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VINYOFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.45, whereas BPTEX.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VINYOFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BPTEX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VINYOFL.BO is more volatile compared to BPTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VINYOFL.BO.Check BPTEX.BO's competition here