United World Holding Group Ltd.
United World Holding Group Ltd. (UWHGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UWHGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UWHGF | $1.45 | +0.00% | 32.4M | -8.53 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| BXBLY | $34.50 | +0.09% | 23.6B | 25.92 | $1.34 | +2.20% |
| BMBLF | $17.69 | +1.73% | 23.3B | 27.66 | $0.62 | +2.49% |
| WOLTF | $72.12 | +0.00% | 16.9B | 13.22 | $5.65 | +3.80% |
| WTKWY | $73.35 | +0.05% | 15.9B | 12.49 | $5.65 | +3.58% |
| RKLIF | $6.06 | +0.00% | 15.2B | 46.62 | $0.13 | +1.95% |
| IKTSF | $63.27 | +5.22% | 9.6B | 20.40 | $3.06 | +3.59% |
| IKTSY | $61.56 | -0.18% | 9.4B | 20.13 | $3.04 | +3.30% |
| DNPLY | $9.84 | -0.81% | 9B | 12.91 | $0.78 | +0.96% |
| INPOF | $18.02 | +80.38% | 9B | 36.04 | $0.50 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UWHGF vs BXBLY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, BXBLY has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while BXBLY trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas BXBLY's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BXBLY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to BXBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check BXBLY's competition here
UWHGF vs BMBLF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, BMBLF has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while BMBLF trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas BMBLF's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BMBLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to BMBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check BMBLF's competition here
UWHGF vs WOLTF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, WOLTF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while WOLTF trades at $72.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas WOLTF's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to WOLTF's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to WOLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check WOLTF's competition here
UWHGF vs WTKWY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, WTKWY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while WTKWY trades at $73.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas WTKWY's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to WTKWY's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to WTKWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check WTKWY's competition here
UWHGF vs RKLIF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, RKLIF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while RKLIF trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas RKLIF's P/E ratio is 46.62. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to RKLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and RKLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKLIF's competition here
UWHGF vs IKTSF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, IKTSF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while IKTSF trades at $63.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas IKTSF's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to IKTSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to IKTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check IKTSF's competition here
UWHGF vs IKTSY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, IKTSY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while IKTSY trades at $61.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas IKTSY's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to IKTSY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to IKTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check IKTSY's competition here
UWHGF vs DNPLY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, DNPLY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while DNPLY trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas DNPLY's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to DNPLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to DNPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check DNPLY's competition here
UWHGF vs INPOF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, INPOF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while INPOF trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas INPOF's P/E ratio is 36.04. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to INPOF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and INPOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INPOF's competition here
UWHGF vs INPOY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, INPOY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while INPOY trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas INPOY's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to INPOY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to INPOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check INPOY's competition here
UWHGF vs TOPPY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, TOPPY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while TOPPY trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas TOPPY's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to TOPPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and TOPPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOPPY's competition here
UWHGF vs SDXAY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, SDXAY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while SDXAY trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas SDXAY's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SDXAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to SDXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check SDXAY's competition here
UWHGF vs DNPCF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, DNPCF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while DNPCF trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas DNPCF's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to DNPCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and DNPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNPCF's competition here
UWHGF vs SDXOF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, SDXOF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while SDXOF trades at $56.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas SDXOF's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SDXOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and SDXOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SDXOF's competition here
UWHGF vs TONPF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, TONPF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while TONPF trades at $28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas TONPF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to TONPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and TONPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TONPF's competition here
UWHGF vs ELSSF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, ELSSF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while ELSSF trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas ELSSF's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ELSSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and ELSSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELSSF's competition here
UWHGF vs CTAGY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, CTAGY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while CTAGY trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas CTAGY's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CTAGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and CTAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTAGY's competition here
UWHGF vs ISFFF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, ISFFF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while ISFFF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas ISFFF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ISFFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and ISFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISFFF's competition here
UWHGF vs SCGPY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, SCGPY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while SCGPY trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas SCGPY's P/E ratio is 52.14. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SCGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and SCGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCGPY's competition here
UWHGF vs TLPFF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, TLPFF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while TLPFF trades at $61.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas TLPFF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to TLPFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to TLPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check TLPFF's competition here
UWHGF vs SECCF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, SECCF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while SECCF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas SECCF's P/E ratio is 50.57. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SECCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and SECCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SECCF's competition here
UWHGF vs TLPFY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, TLPFY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while TLPFY trades at $29.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas TLPFY's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to TLPFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to TLPFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check TLPFY's competition here
UWHGF vs MITFY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, MITFY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while MITFY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas MITFY's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MITFY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to MITFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check MITFY's competition here
UWHGF vs MITFF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, MITFF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while MITFF trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas MITFF's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MITFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and MITFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MITFF's competition here
UWHGF vs ACENY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, ACENY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while ACENY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas ACENY's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ACENY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to ACENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check ACENY's competition here
UWHGF vs APLUF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, APLUF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while APLUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas APLUF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to APLUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to APLUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check APLUF's competition here
UWHGF vs RELOF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, RELOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while RELOF trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas RELOF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to RELOF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and RELOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RELOF's competition here
UWHGF vs ISSDY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, ISSDY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while ISSDY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas ISSDY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ISSDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to ISSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check ISSDY's competition here
UWHGF vs TCLAF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, TCLAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while TCLAF trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas TCLAF's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to TCLAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and TCLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCLAF's competition here
UWHGF vs TCLCF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, TCLCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while TCLCF trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas TCLCF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to TCLCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and TCLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCLCF's competition here
UWHGF vs DLUEY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, DLUEY has a market cap of 979.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while DLUEY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas DLUEY's P/E ratio is -15.63. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to DLUEY's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and DLUEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLUEY's competition here
UWHGF vs STGXF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, STGXF has a market cap of 789.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while STGXF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas STGXF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to STGXF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and STGXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STGXF's competition here
UWHGF vs JSVGF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, JSVGF has a market cap of 683.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while JSVGF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas JSVGF's P/E ratio is 117.73. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to JSVGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and JSVGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JSVGF's competition here
UWHGF vs CLNFF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, CLNFF has a market cap of 626.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while CLNFF trades at $56.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas CLNFF's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CLNFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to CLNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check CLNFF's competition here
UWHGF vs GDIFF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, GDIFF has a market cap of 620.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while GDIFF trades at $26.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas GDIFF's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to GDIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and GDIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GDIFF's competition here
UWHGF vs HZNOF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, HZNOF has a market cap of 597.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while HZNOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas HZNOF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to HZNOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and HZNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HZNOF's competition here
UWHGF vs IRMTF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, IRMTF has a market cap of 595.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while IRMTF trades at $31.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas IRMTF's P/E ratio is 29.74. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to IRMTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and IRMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRMTF's competition here
UWHGF vs IPHLF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, IPHLF has a market cap of 546.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while IPHLF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas IPHLF's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to IPHLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and IPHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPHLF's competition here
UWHGF vs GLCDF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, GLCDF has a market cap of 540.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while GLCDF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas GLCDF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to GLCDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and GLCDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLCDF's competition here
UWHGF vs RKSLF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, RKSLF has a market cap of 524.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while RKSLF trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas RKSLF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to RKSLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and RKSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKSLF's competition here
UWHGF vs ITEPF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, ITEPF has a market cap of 448.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while ITEPF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas ITEPF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ITEPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and ITEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITEPF's competition here
UWHGF vs CTAGF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, CTAGF has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while CTAGF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas CTAGF's P/E ratio is 64.17. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CTAGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and CTAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTAGF's competition here
UWHGF vs KBRLF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, KBRLF has a market cap of 339.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while KBRLF trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas KBRLF's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to KBRLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and KBRLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KBRLF's competition here
UWHGF vs DELRF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, DELRF has a market cap of 328M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while DELRF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas DELRF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to DELRF's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and DELRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DELRF's competition here
UWHGF vs VSSPY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, VSSPY has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while VSSPY trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas VSSPY's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to VSSPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and VSSPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSSPY's competition here
UWHGF vs ITEGY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, ITEGY has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while ITEGY trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas ITEGY's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ITEGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and ITEGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITEGY's competition here
UWHGF vs KPGHF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, KPGHF has a market cap of 215.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while KPGHF trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas KPGHF's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to KPGHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to KPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check KPGHF's competition here
UWHGF vs PGWFF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, PGWFF has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while PGWFF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas PGWFF's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to PGWFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to PGWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check PGWFF's competition here
UWHGF vs PCRRF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, PCRRF has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while PCRRF trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas PCRRF's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to PCRRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to PCRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check PCRRF's competition here
UWHGF vs CERGF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, CERGF has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while CERGF trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas CERGF's P/E ratio is 63.71. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CERGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and CERGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CERGF's competition here
UWHGF vs AJISF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, AJISF has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while AJISF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas AJISF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to AJISF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and AJISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AJISF's competition here
UWHGF vs CTGL Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, CTGL has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while CTGL trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas CTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CTGL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to CTGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check CTGL's competition here
UWHGF vs PCOA Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, PCOA has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while PCOA trades at $150,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas PCOA's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to PCOA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UWHGF has daily volatility of 0.00 and PCOA has daily volatility of N/A.Check PCOA's competition here
UWHGF vs FLNCF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, FLNCF has a market cap of 67.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while FLNCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas FLNCF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to FLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and FLNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLNCF's competition here
UWHGF vs RDCPF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, RDCPF has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while RDCPF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas RDCPF's P/E ratio is 173.50. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to RDCPF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to RDCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check RDCPF's competition here
UWHGF vs WTLLF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, WTLLF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while WTLLF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas WTLLF's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to WTLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and WTLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTLLF's competition here
UWHGF vs DCMDF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, DCMDF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while DCMDF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas DCMDF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to DCMDF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and DCMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DCMDF's competition here
UWHGF vs SRRPF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, SRRPF has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while SRRPF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas SRRPF's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SRRPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and SRRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRRPF's competition here
UWHGF vs ASFH Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, ASFH has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while ASFH trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas ASFH's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ASFH's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to ASFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check ASFH's competition here
UWHGF vs ESTTF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, ESTTF has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while ESTTF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas ESTTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ESTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to ESTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check ESTTF's competition here
UWHGF vs CRKT Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, CRKT has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while CRKT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas CRKT's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CRKT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and CRKT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRKT's competition here
UWHGF vs FTBGF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, FTBGF has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while FTBGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas FTBGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to FTBGF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and FTBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FTBGF's competition here
UWHGF vs SFRX Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, SFRX has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while SFRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas SFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SFRX's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to SFRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check SFRX's competition here
UWHGF vs GNOLF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, GNOLF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while GNOLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas GNOLF's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to GNOLF's ROE of +4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and GNOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNOLF's competition here
UWHGF vs RLFTY Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, RLFTY has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while RLFTY trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas RLFTY's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to RLFTY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and RLFTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RLFTY's competition here
UWHGF vs NSYC Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, NSYC has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while NSYC trades at $377.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas NSYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to NSYC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and NSYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSYC's competition here
UWHGF vs ELVG Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, ELVG has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while ELVG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas ELVG's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ELVG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and ELVG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELVG's competition here
UWHGF vs REPO Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, REPO has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while REPO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas REPO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to REPO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to REPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check REPO's competition here
UWHGF vs GPOX Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, GPOX has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while GPOX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas GPOX's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to GPOX's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to GPOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check GPOX's competition here
UWHGF vs ADMQ Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, ADMQ has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while ADMQ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas ADMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ADMQ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to ADMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check ADMQ's competition here
UWHGF vs LMTI Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, LMTI has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while LMTI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas LMTI's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to LMTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to LMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check LMTI's competition here
UWHGF vs AWAW Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, AWAW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while AWAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas AWAW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to AWAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and AWAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AWAW's competition here
UWHGF vs CGRW Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, CGRW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while CGRW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas CGRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CGRW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to CGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check CGRW's competition here
UWHGF vs OODH Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, OODH has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while OODH trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas OODH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to OODH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and OODH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OODH's competition here
UWHGF vs ANMP Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, ANMP has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while ANMP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas ANMP's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ANMP's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and ANMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANMP's competition here
UWHGF vs SAYFF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, SAYFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while SAYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas SAYFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SAYFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and SAYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAYFF's competition here
UWHGF vs UNDR Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, UNDR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while UNDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas UNDR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to UNDR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and UNDR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNDR's competition here
UWHGF vs HHGI Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, HHGI has a market cap of 607.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while HHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas HHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to HHGI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and HHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HHGI's competition here
UWHGF vs JFIL Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, JFIL has a market cap of 537.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while JFIL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas JFIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to JFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and JFIL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JFIL's competition here
UWHGF vs MTPR Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, MTPR has a market cap of 393.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while MTPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas MTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to MTPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and MTPR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTPR's competition here
UWHGF vs DTSL Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, DTSL has a market cap of 391.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while DTSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas DTSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to DTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and DTSL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTSL's competition here
UWHGF vs WLDPF Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, WLDPF has a market cap of 360.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while WLDPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas WLDPF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to WLDPF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and WLDPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WLDPF's competition here
UWHGF vs XCPL Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, XCPL has a market cap of 337K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while XCPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas XCPL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to XCPL's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to XCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check XCPL's competition here
UWHGF vs ECOX Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, ECOX has a market cap of 328.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while ECOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas ECOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to ECOX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to ECOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check ECOX's competition here
UWHGF vs DPUI Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, DPUI has a market cap of 299.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while DPUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas DPUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to DPUI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and DPUI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DPUI's competition here
UWHGF vs IJJP Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, IJJP has a market cap of 221.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while IJJP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas IJJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to IJJP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and IJJP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IJJP's competition here
UWHGF vs OPMG Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, OPMG has a market cap of 219.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while OPMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas OPMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to OPMG's ROE of +15.86%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and OPMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPMG's competition here
UWHGF vs IMJX Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, IMJX has a market cap of 112.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while IMJX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas IMJX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to IMJX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and IMJX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMJX's competition here
UWHGF vs INCC Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, INCC has a market cap of 109.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while INCC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas INCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to INCC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to INCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check INCC's competition here
UWHGF vs PIFR Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, PIFR has a market cap of 103.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while PIFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas PIFR's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to PIFR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and PIFR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIFR's competition here
UWHGF vs NNFC Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, NNFC has a market cap of 97.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while NNFC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas NNFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to NNFC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and NNFC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNFC's competition here
UWHGF vs UCPC Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, UCPC has a market cap of 56.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while UCPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas UCPC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to UCPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to UCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check UCPC's competition here
UWHGF vs PPMT Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, PPMT has a market cap of 54.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while PPMT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas PPMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to PPMT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and PPMT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPMT's competition here
UWHGF vs GFGU Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, GFGU has a market cap of 48.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while GFGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas GFGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to GFGU's ROE of +15.99%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and GFGU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GFGU's competition here
UWHGF vs BFLD Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, BFLD has a market cap of 43.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while BFLD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas BFLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to BFLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to BFLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check BFLD's competition here
UWHGF vs CBMJ Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, CBMJ has a market cap of 42.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while CBMJ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas CBMJ's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to CBMJ's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF is less volatile compared to CBMJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UWHGF.Check CBMJ's competition here
UWHGF vs SGLS Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, SGLS has a market cap of 39.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while SGLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas SGLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to SGLS's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and SGLS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGLS's competition here
UWHGF vs OPUS Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, OPUS has a market cap of 34.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while OPUS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas OPUS's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to OPUS's ROE of +12.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and OPUS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPUS's competition here
UWHGF vs AXCG Comparison February 2026
UWHGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UWHGF stands at 32.4M. In comparison, AXCG has a market cap of 31.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UWHGF is priced at $1.45, while AXCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UWHGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.53, whereas AXCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UWHGF's ROE is -3.11%, compared to AXCG's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UWHGF and AXCG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXCG's competition here