UTI Asset Management Company Limited

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, JIOFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while JIOFIN.NS trades at ₹224.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas JIOFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 91.56. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JIOFIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to JIOFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JIOFIN.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, JIOFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while JIOFIN.BO trades at ₹225.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas JIOFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 91.52. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JIOFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to JIOFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JIOFIN.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, BAJAJHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while BAJAJHLDNG.NS trades at ₹8,786.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BAJAJHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAJAJHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BAJAJHLDNG.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, BAJAJHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while BAJAJHLDNG.BO trades at ₹8,783.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BAJAJHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAJAJHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BAJAJHLDNG.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, UTINIFTETF.BO has a market cap of 622.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while UTINIFTETF.BO trades at ₹288.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas UTINIFTETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UTINIFTETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to UTINIFTETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check UTINIFTETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NAM-INDIA.BO has a market cap of 530.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NAM-INDIA.BO trades at ₹814.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NAM-INDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 37.30. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAM-INDIA.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NAM-INDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NAM-INDIA.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NAM-INDIA.NS has a market cap of 530.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NAM-INDIA.NS trades at ₹813.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NAM-INDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 37.22. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAM-INDIA.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NAM-INDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NAM-INDIA.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, HDFCAMC.NS has a market cap of 495.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while HDFCAMC.NS trades at ₹2,232.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas HDFCAMC.NS's P/E ratio is 34.63. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDFCAMC.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to HDFCAMC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HDFCAMC.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, HDFCAMC.BO has a market cap of 495.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while HDFCAMC.BO trades at ₹2,234.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas HDFCAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDFCAMC.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to HDFCAMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HDFCAMC.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, UTISENSETF.BO has a market cap of 478.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while UTISENSETF.BO trades at ₹942.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas UTISENSETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UTISENSETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to UTISENSETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check UTISENSETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, UTISENSETF.NS has a market cap of 476.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while UTISENSETF.NS trades at ₹939.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas UTISENSETF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UTISENSETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to UTISENSETF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check UTISENSETF.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, CPSEETF.BO has a market cap of 455.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while CPSEETF.BO trades at ₹100.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas CPSEETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPSEETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to CPSEETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check CPSEETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, CPSEETF.NS has a market cap of 455.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while CPSEETF.NS trades at ₹100.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas CPSEETF.NS's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPSEETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to CPSEETF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check CPSEETF.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, 360ONE.BO has a market cap of 396.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while 360ONE.BO trades at ₹953.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas 360ONE.BO's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 360ONE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to 360ONE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check 360ONE.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, 360ONE.NS has a market cap of 396.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while 360ONE.NS trades at ₹951.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas 360ONE.NS's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 360ONE.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to 360ONE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check 360ONE.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, ABSLAMC.NS has a market cap of 260.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while ABSLAMC.NS trades at ₹874.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas ABSLAMC.NS's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABSLAMC.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to ABSLAMC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ABSLAMC.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, ABSLAMC.BO has a market cap of 260.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while ABSLAMC.BO trades at ₹872.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas ABSLAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABSLAMC.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to ABSLAMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ABSLAMC.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, ANANDRATHI.NS has a market cap of 251.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while ANANDRATHI.NS trades at ₹3,020.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas ANANDRATHI.NS's P/E ratio is 68.47. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANANDRATHI.NS's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to ANANDRATHI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ANANDRATHI.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, ANANDRATHI.BO has a market cap of 251.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while ANANDRATHI.BO trades at ₹3,020.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas ANANDRATHI.BO's P/E ratio is 68.41. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANANDRATHI.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to ANANDRATHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ANANDRATHI.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NIFTYBEES.BO has a market cap of 218.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NIFTYBEES.BO trades at ₹254.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NIFTYBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIFTYBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to NIFTYBEES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NIFTYBEES.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NIFTYBEES.NS has a market cap of 218.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NIFTYBEES.NS trades at ₹254.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NIFTYBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIFTYBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NIFTYBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NIFTYBEES.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NUVAMA.NS has a market cap of 217.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NUVAMA.NS trades at ₹1,151.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NUVAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NUVAMA.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NUVAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NUVAMA.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NUVAMA.BO has a market cap of 217.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NUVAMA.BO trades at ₹1,151.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NUVAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NUVAMA.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NUVAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NUVAMA.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NIFTYIETF.BO has a market cap of 207.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NIFTYIETF.BO trades at ₹253.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NIFTYIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIFTYIETF.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to NIFTYIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NIFTYIETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NIFTYIETF.NS has a market cap of 206B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NIFTYIETF.NS trades at ₹252.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NIFTYIETF.NS's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIFTYIETF.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NIFTYIETF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NIFTYIETF.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, GOLDBEES.NS has a market cap of 194.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while GOLDBEES.NS trades at ₹120.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas GOLDBEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOLDBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check GOLDBEES.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, IDFC.NS has a market cap of 174B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while IDFC.NS trades at ₹108.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas IDFC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDFC.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to IDFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check IDFC.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, IDFC.BO has a market cap of 172.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while IDFC.BO trades at ₹108.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas IDFC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDFC.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to IDFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check IDFC.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NSDL.BO has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NSDL.BO trades at ₹799.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NSDL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.55. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSDL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NSDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NSDL.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, SENSEXIETF.BO has a market cap of 122.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while SENSEXIETF.BO trades at ₹825.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas SENSEXIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SENSEXIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to SENSEXIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check SENSEXIETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, UTIAMC.BO has a market cap of 120.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while UTIAMC.BO trades at ₹923.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas UTIAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UTIAMC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to UTIAMC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check UTIAMC.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, LIQUIDBEES.NS has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while LIQUIDBEES.NS trades at ₹1,000.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas LIQUIDBEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIQUIDBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to LIQUIDBEES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check LIQUIDBEES.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, PRUDENT.NS has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while PRUDENT.NS trades at ₹2,176.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas PRUDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRUDENT.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to PRUDENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check PRUDENT.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, PRUDENT.BO has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while PRUDENT.BO trades at ₹2,190.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas PRUDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 42.59. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRUDENT.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to PRUDENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check PRUDENT.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, BANKBEES.BO has a market cap of 80B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while BANKBEES.BO trades at ₹523.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BANKBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BANKBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to BANKBEES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BANKBEES.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, BANKBEES.NS has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while BANKBEES.NS trades at ₹523.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BANKBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BANKBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to BANKBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BANKBEES.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, TSFINV.NS has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while TSFINV.NS trades at ₹335.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas TSFINV.NS's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSFINV.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to TSFINV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check TSFINV.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, SHREMINVIT.NS has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while SHREMINVIT.NS trades at ₹118.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas SHREMINVIT.NS's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHREMINVIT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UTIAMC.NS has daily volatility of 2.10 and SHREMINVIT.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check SHREMINVIT.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, INDUSINVIT.BO has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while INDUSINVIT.BO trades at ₹122.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas INDUSINVIT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDUSINVIT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to INDUSINVIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check INDUSINVIT.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, BHINVIT.BO has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while BHINVIT.BO trades at ₹112.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BHINVIT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHINVIT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to BHINVIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BHINVIT.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, JUNIORBEES.BO has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while JUNIORBEES.BO trades at ₹654.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas JUNIORBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JUNIORBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to JUNIORBEES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JUNIORBEES.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, JUNIORBEES.NS has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while JUNIORBEES.NS trades at ₹654.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas JUNIORBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JUNIORBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to JUNIORBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JUNIORBEES.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, PILANIINVS.BO has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while PILANIINVS.BO trades at ₹4,180.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas PILANIINVS.BO's P/E ratio is 168.55. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PILANIINVS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to PILANIINVS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check PILANIINVS.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, PILANIINVS.NS has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while PILANIINVS.NS trades at ₹4,179.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas PILANIINVS.NS's P/E ratio is 4812.86. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PILANIINVS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to PILANIINVS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check PILANIINVS.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, SENSEXBEES.BO has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while SENSEXBEES.BO trades at ₹828.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas SENSEXBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SENSEXBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to SENSEXBEES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check SENSEXBEES.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, 0P00017K5W.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while 0P00017K5W.BO trades at ₹40.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas 0P00017K5W.BO's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to 0P00017K5W.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check 0P00017K5W.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, LOWVOLIETF.BO has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while LOWVOLIETF.BO trades at ₹20.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas LOWVOLIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOWVOLIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to LOWVOLIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check LOWVOLIETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, BANKIETF.BO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while BANKIETF.BO trades at ₹51.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BANKIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BANKIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to BANKIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BANKIETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, PSUBNKBEES.BO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while PSUBNKBEES.BO trades at ₹88.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas PSUBNKBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSUBNKBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to PSUBNKBEES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check PSUBNKBEES.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, PSUBNKBEES.NS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while PSUBNKBEES.NS trades at ₹88.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas PSUBNKBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSUBNKBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to PSUBNKBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check PSUBNKBEES.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NSIL.BO has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NSIL.BO trades at ₹4,812.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 112.90. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NSIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NSIL.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NSIL.NS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NSIL.NS trades at ₹4,810.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 112.99. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSIL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NSIL.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, GOLDSHARE.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while GOLDSHARE.NS trades at ₹114.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas GOLDSHARE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOLDSHARE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDSHARE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check GOLDSHARE.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, PVTBANIETF.BO has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while PVTBANIETF.BO trades at ₹24.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas PVTBANIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PVTBANIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to PVTBANIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check PVTBANIETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, UTINEXT50.BO has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while UTINEXT50.BO trades at ₹73.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas UTINEXT50.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UTINEXT50.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to UTINEXT50.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check UTINEXT50.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, SETFNIF50.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while SETFNIF50.BO trades at ₹240.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas SETFNIF50.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SETFNIF50.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to SETFNIF50.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check SETFNIF50.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, SETFNIF50.NS has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while SETFNIF50.NS trades at ₹240.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas SETFNIF50.NS's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SETFNIF50.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to SETFNIF50.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check SETFNIF50.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, KICL.NS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while KICL.NS trades at ₹4,068.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas KICL.NS's P/E ratio is 42.80. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KICL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to KICL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check KICL.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, KICL.BO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while KICL.BO trades at ₹4,060.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas KICL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.80. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KICL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to KICL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check KICL.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, LTGILTBEES.NS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while LTGILTBEES.NS trades at ₹28.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas LTGILTBEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTGILTBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to LTGILTBEES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check LTGILTBEES.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, ALPL30IETF.BO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while ALPL30IETF.BO trades at ₹24.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas ALPL30IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALPL30IETF.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to ALPL30IETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ALPL30IETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, MID150BEES.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while MID150BEES.NS trades at ₹201.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas MID150BEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MID150BEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to MID150BEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MID150BEES.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, BFINVEST.BO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while BFINVEST.BO trades at ₹328.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BFINVEST.BO's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BFINVEST.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to BFINVEST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BFINVEST.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, BFINVEST.NS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while BFINVEST.NS trades at ₹328.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BFINVEST.NS's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BFINVEST.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to BFINVEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BFINVEST.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, JPOLYINVST.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while JPOLYINVST.BO trades at ₹1,036.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas JPOLYINVST.BO's P/E ratio is 1.24. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPOLYINVST.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to JPOLYINVST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JPOLYINVST.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, JPOLYINVST.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while JPOLYINVST.NS trades at ₹1,037.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas JPOLYINVST.NS's P/E ratio is 1.24. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPOLYINVST.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to JPOLYINVST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JPOLYINVST.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, JINDALPHOT.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while JINDALPHOT.NS trades at ₹993.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas JINDALPHOT.NS's P/E ratio is 87.98. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JINDALPHOT.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to JINDALPHOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JINDALPHOT.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, JINDALPHOT.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while JINDALPHOT.BO trades at ₹1,002.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas JINDALPHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JINDALPHOT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to JINDALPHOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JINDALPHOT.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NEXT50IETF.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NEXT50IETF.BO trades at ₹64.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NEXT50IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEXT50IETF.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NEXT50IETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NEXT50IETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, BINDALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while BINDALAGRO.NS trades at ₹22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BINDALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BINDALAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to BINDALAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BINDALAGRO.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, OSWALGREEN.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while OSWALGREEN.NS trades at ₹20.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas OSWALGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OSWALGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to OSWALGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check OSWALGREEN.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, OSWALGREEN.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while OSWALGREEN.BO trades at ₹20.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas OSWALGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OSWALGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to OSWALGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check OSWALGREEN.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, HNGSNGBEES.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while HNGSNGBEES.NS trades at ₹457.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas HNGSNGBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HNGSNGBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to HNGSNGBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HNGSNGBEES.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, EBIX.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while EBIX.BO trades at ₹21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas EBIX.BO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBIX.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to EBIX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check EBIX.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, SILINV.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while SILINV.BO trades at ₹380.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas SILINV.BO's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SILINV.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to SILINV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check SILINV.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, SILINV.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while SILINV.NS trades at ₹381.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas SILINV.NS's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SILINV.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to SILINV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check SILINV.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, MIDCAPIETF.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while MIDCAPIETF.BO trades at ₹20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas MIDCAPIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MIDCAPIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to MIDCAPIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MIDCAPIETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, FMCGIETF.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while FMCGIETF.BO trades at ₹49.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas FMCGIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FMCGIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to FMCGIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check FMCGIETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, FMCGIETF.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while FMCGIETF.NS trades at ₹48.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas FMCGIETF.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FMCGIETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to FMCGIETF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check FMCGIETF.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, ITIETF.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while ITIETF.BO trades at ₹32.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas ITIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to ITIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ITIETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, MOM30IETF.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while MOM30IETF.BO trades at ₹27.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas MOM30IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOM30IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to MOM30IETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MOM30IETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, 0P00005WLX.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while 0P00005WLX.BO trades at ₹213.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas 0P00005WLX.BO's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0P00005WLX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to 0P00005WLX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check 0P00005WLX.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, BSE500IETF.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while BSE500IETF.BO trades at ₹34.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BSE500IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSE500IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to BSE500IETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BSE500IETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, TIMESGTY.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while TIMESGTY.NS trades at ₹286.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas TIMESGTY.NS's P/E ratio is 110.08. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIMESGTY.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to TIMESGTY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check TIMESGTY.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, TIMESGTY.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while TIMESGTY.BO trades at ₹283.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas TIMESGTY.BO's P/E ratio is 109.56. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIMESGTY.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to TIMESGTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check TIMESGTY.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, ICICIB22.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while ICICIB22.BO trades at ₹114.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas ICICIB22.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICICIB22.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to ICICIB22.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ICICIB22.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, ICICIB22.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while ICICIB22.NS trades at ₹114.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas ICICIB22.NS's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICICIB22.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to ICICIB22.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ICICIB22.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NIF100BEES.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NIF100BEES.NS trades at ₹243.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NIF100BEES.NS's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIF100BEES.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NIF100BEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NIF100BEES.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NIF100BEES.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NIF100BEES.BO trades at ₹244.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NIF100BEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIF100BEES.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NIF100BEES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NIF100BEES.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, TEAMGTY.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while TEAMGTY.NS trades at ₹249.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas TEAMGTY.NS's P/E ratio is 108.33. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEAMGTY.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to TEAMGTY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check TEAMGTY.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, TEAMGTY.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while TEAMGTY.BO trades at ₹253.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas TEAMGTY.BO's P/E ratio is 107.42. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEAMGTY.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to TEAMGTY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check TEAMGTY.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, HEALTHIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while HEALTHIETF.BO trades at ₹146.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas HEALTHIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HEALTHIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to HEALTHIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HEALTHIETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, NV20IETF.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while NV20IETF.BO trades at ₹13.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NV20IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NV20IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NV20IETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NV20IETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, BEACON.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while BEACON.NS trades at ₹68.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BEACON.NS's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BEACON.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to BEACON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BEACON.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, MON100.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while MON100.NS trades at ₹230.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas MON100.NS's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MON100.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to MON100.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MON100.NS's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, AUTOIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while AUTOIETF.BO trades at ₹24.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas AUTOIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUTOIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check AUTOIETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, INFRAIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while INFRAIETF.BO trades at ₹88.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas INFRAIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INFRAIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to INFRAIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check INFRAIETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, QUAL30IETF.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while QUAL30IETF.BO trades at ₹18.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas QUAL30IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QUAL30IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to QUAL30IETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check QUAL30IETF.BO's competition here

UTIAMC.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 120.4B. In comparison, FINIETF.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹922.30, while FINIETF.BO trades at ₹27.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas FINIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FINIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to FINIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check FINIETF.BO's competition here