The Glimpse Group, Inc.
The Glimpse Group, Inc. (US37892C1062.SG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (US37892C1062.SG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US37892C1062.SG | €1.15 | +1.77% | 24.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SAP.DE | €147.02 | +3.13% | 171.7B | 24.10 | €6.10 | +1.60% |
| FOO.DE | €160.80 | +2.70% | 152.6B | 23.79 | €6.76 | +0.89% |
| FOO.F | €158.44 | +0.92% | 148.6B | 23.40 | €6.77 | +0.90% |
| 307.F | €97.03 | +0.97% | 128.3B | 118.33 | €0.82 | N/A |
| ITU.DE | €373.25 | +3.05% | 103.4B | 28.00 | €13.33 | +1.04% |
| CDS.DE | €235.90 | +0.38% | 64.1B | 67.35 | €3.49 | N/A |
| AUD.DE | €205.25 | +3.17% | 43.6B | 45.59 | €4.50 | N/A |
| 5ZM.F | €67.15 | -0.68% | 19.9B | 12.55 | €5.35 | N/A |
| FFV.DE | €297.70 | +0.40% | 17.4B | 53.83 | €5.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
US37892C1062.SG vs SAP.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, SAP.DE has a market cap of 171.7B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while SAP.DE trades at €147.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAP.DE's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAP.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to SAP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check SAP.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs FOO.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, FOO.DE has a market cap of 152.6B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while FOO.DE trades at €160.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOO.DE's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOO.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to FOO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check FOO.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs FOO.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, FOO.F has a market cap of 148.6B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while FOO.F trades at €158.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOO.F's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOO.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to FOO.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check FOO.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 307.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 307.F has a market cap of 128.3B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 307.F trades at €97.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 307.F's P/E ratio is 118.33. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 307.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to 307.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 307.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs ITU.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, ITU.DE has a market cap of 103.4B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while ITU.DE trades at €373.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITU.DE's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITU.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to ITU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check ITU.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs CDS.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, CDS.DE has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while CDS.DE trades at €235.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDS.DE's P/E ratio is 67.35. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDS.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to CDS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check CDS.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs AUD.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, AUD.DE has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while AUD.DE trades at €205.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUD.DE's P/E ratio is 45.59. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUD.DE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to AUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check AUD.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 5ZM.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 5ZM.F has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 5ZM.F trades at €67.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5ZM.F's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 5ZM.F's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to 5ZM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 5ZM.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs FFV.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, FFV.DE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while FFV.DE trades at €297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFV.DE's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFV.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to FFV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check FFV.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs CTX.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, CTX.DE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while CTX.DE trades at €106.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTX.DE's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTX.DE's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to CTX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check CTX.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs E3G1.SG Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, E3G1.SG has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while E3G1.SG trades at €52.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E3G1.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to E3G1.SG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to E3G1.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check E3G1.SG's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs NEM.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, NEM.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while NEM.DE trades at €62.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEM.DE's P/E ratio is 35.42. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEM.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to NEM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check NEM.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs US44891N2080.SG Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, US44891N2080.SG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while US44891N2080.SG trades at €29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas US44891N2080.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to US44891N2080.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to US44891N2080.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check US44891N2080.SG's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs RKET.HM Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, RKET.HM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while RKET.HM trades at €25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKET.HM's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RKET.HM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to RKET.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check RKET.HM's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs AOF.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, AOF.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while AOF.DE trades at €73.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOF.DE's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AOF.DE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to AOF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check AOF.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs VRF.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, VRF.DE has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while VRF.DE trades at €3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRF.DE's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VRF.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to VRF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check VRF.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs M8G.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, M8G.DE has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while M8G.DE trades at €3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas M8G.DE's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to M8G.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to M8G.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check M8G.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs M8G.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, M8G.F has a market cap of 706.5M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while M8G.F trades at €3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas M8G.F's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to M8G.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to M8G.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check M8G.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs PSAN.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, PSAN.DE has a market cap of 698.5M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while PSAN.DE trades at €45.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSAN.DE's P/E ratio is -30.27. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSAN.DE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to PSAN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check PSAN.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs TMV.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, TMV.DE has a market cap of 697.6M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while TMV.DE trades at €4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMV.DE's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMV.DE's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to TMV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check TMV.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs GKS.HM Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, GKS.HM has a market cap of 647.8M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while GKS.HM trades at €285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKS.HM's P/E ratio is -123.38. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GKS.HM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to GKS.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check GKS.HM's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 0S6.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 0S6.DE has a market cap of 576M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 0S6.DE trades at €14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0S6.DE's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0S6.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to 0S6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 0S6.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs MUM.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, MUM.DE has a market cap of 552.4M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while MUM.DE trades at €33.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MUM.DE's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUM.DE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to MUM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check MUM.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs GKS.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, GKS.DE has a market cap of 494.6M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while GKS.DE trades at €219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKS.DE's P/E ratio is -44.88. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GKS.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to GKS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check GKS.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs IVU.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, IVU.DE has a market cap of 306M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while IVU.DE trades at €17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVU.DE's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVU.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to IVU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check IVU.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs VRV.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, VRV.DE has a market cap of 268.6M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while VRV.DE trades at €1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to VRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check VRV.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs DBD.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, DBD.DE has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while DBD.DE trades at €2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBD.DE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to DBD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check DBD.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs MSGL.HM Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, MSGL.HM has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while MSGL.HM trades at €3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSGL.HM's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSGL.HM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to MSGL.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check MSGL.HM's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs SJJ.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, SJJ.DE has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while SJJ.DE trades at €12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJJ.DE's P/E ratio is 112.27. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SJJ.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to SJJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check SJJ.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 52D0.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 52D0.F has a market cap of 121.2M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 52D0.F trades at €0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 52D0.F's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 52D0.F's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to 52D0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 52D0.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs FAA.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, FAA.DE has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while FAA.DE trades at €10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAA.DE's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAA.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to FAA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check FAA.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs TPG.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, TPG.DE has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while TPG.DE trades at €5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPG.DE's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPG.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to TPG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check TPG.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs BSS.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, BSS.F has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while BSS.F trades at €22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSS.F's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSS.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to BSS.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check BSS.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs V3S.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, V3S.DE has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while V3S.DE trades at €12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3S.DE's P/E ratio is -43.75. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3S.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to V3S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check V3S.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs ESY.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, ESY.DE has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while ESY.DE trades at €13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESY.DE's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESY.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to ESY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check ESY.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 27H.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 27H.F has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 27H.F trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 27H.F's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 27H.F's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to 27H.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 27H.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs TPG0.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, TPG0.DE has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while TPG0.DE trades at €2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPG0.DE's P/E ratio is 1.24. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPG0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to TPG0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check TPG0.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs CSH.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, CSH.DE has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while CSH.DE trades at €6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSH.DE's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH.DE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to CSH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check CSH.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs TR9.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, TR9.F has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while TR9.F trades at €18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR9.F's P/E ratio is -41.09. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR9.F's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to TR9.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check TR9.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs TR9.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, TR9.DE has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while TR9.DE trades at €17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR9.DE's P/E ratio is -38.15. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR9.DE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to TR9.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check TR9.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 1OJ.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 1OJ.F has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 1OJ.F trades at €0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 1OJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1OJ.F's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to 1OJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 1OJ.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 1OJ.SG Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 1OJ.SG has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 1OJ.SG trades at €0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 1OJ.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1OJ.SG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to 1OJ.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 1OJ.SG's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs VRL.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, VRL.DE has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while VRL.DE trades at €13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRL.DE's P/E ratio is -29.36. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VRL.DE's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to VRL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check VRL.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs NIIN.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, NIIN.DE has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while NIIN.DE trades at €0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIIN.DE's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIIN.DE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to NIIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check NIIN.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs TBX.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, TBX.F has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while TBX.F trades at €8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBX.F's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBX.F's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to TBX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check TBX.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs TBX0.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, TBX0.F has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while TBX0.F trades at €8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBX0.F's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBX0.F's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to TBX0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check TBX0.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 31M.SG Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 31M.SG has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 31M.SG trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 31M.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 31M.SG's ROE of +4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to 31M.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 31M.SG's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs ISHA.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, ISHA.DE has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while ISHA.DE trades at €1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISHA.DE's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISHA.DE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to ISHA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check ISHA.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs C1V0.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, C1V0.DE has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while C1V0.DE trades at €6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C1V0.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C1V0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to C1V0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check C1V0.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs BWQ.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, BWQ.DE has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while BWQ.DE trades at €3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWQ.DE's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BWQ.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to BWQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check BWQ.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs IVX.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, IVX.DE has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while IVX.DE trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVX.DE's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVX.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to IVX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check IVX.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs DTD2.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, DTD2.DE has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while DTD2.DE trades at €1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTD2.DE's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTD2.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to DTD2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check DTD2.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 9DR.SG Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 9DR.SG has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 9DR.SG trades at €0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9DR.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9DR.SG's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to 9DR.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 9DR.SG's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 8DQ.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 8DQ.F has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 8DQ.F trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 8DQ.F's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8DQ.F's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to 8DQ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 8DQ.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs ABX.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, ABX.DE has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while ABX.DE trades at €1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABX.DE's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABX.DE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to ABX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check ABX.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 2LH.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 2LH.F has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 2LH.F trades at €1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2LH.F's P/E ratio is -43.85. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2LH.F's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to 2LH.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 2LH.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs CPU2.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, CPU2.F has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while CPU2.F trades at €0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPU2.F's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPU2.F's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to CPU2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check CPU2.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs JE00B1Z48326.SG Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, JE00B1Z48326.SG has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while JE00B1Z48326.SG trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JE00B1Z48326.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JE00B1Z48326.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to JE00B1Z48326.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check JE00B1Z48326.SG's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 223.SG Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 223.SG has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 223.SG trades at €0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 223.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 223.SG's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to 223.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 223.SG's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs PLARTGS00019.SG Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, PLARTGS00019.SG has a market cap of 511.9K. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while PLARTGS00019.SG trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLARTGS00019.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLARTGS00019.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to PLARTGS00019.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check PLARTGS00019.SG's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 1HD.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 1HD.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 1HD.F trades at €0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 1HD.F's P/E ratio is -21.59. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1HD.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to 1HD.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 1HD.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs 9J4.F Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, 9J4.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while 9J4.F trades at €0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 9J4.F's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9J4.F's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to 9J4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check 9J4.F's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs SC2.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, SC2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while SC2.DE trades at €50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC2.DE's P/E ratio is -168.31. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SC2.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is more volatile compared to SC2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check SC2.DE's competition here
US37892C1062.SG vs CAP.DE Comparison March 2026
US37892C1062.SG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, US37892C1062.SG stands at 24.2M. In comparison, CAP.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, US37892C1062.SG is priced at €1.15, while CAP.DE trades at €3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
US37892C1062.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, US37892C1062.SG's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAP.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, US37892C1062.SG is less volatile compared to CAP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for US37892C1062.SG.Check CAP.DE's competition here