Uni-Pixel, Inc.
Uni-Pixel, Inc. UNXLQ Peers
See (UNXLQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNXLQ | $0.00 | -99.00% | 2.9K | -0.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| KYCCF | $414.80 | +3.92% | 100.6B | 36.04 | $11.51 | +0.54% |
| HNHPF | $10.44 | +0.77% | 72.5B | 12.89 | $0.81 | +0.11% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | N/A | 45.2B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +0.17% |
| HXGBY | $10.21 | +0.99% | 27.4B | 24.90 | $0.41 | +1.52% |
| MRAAY | $7.31 | +0.41% | 27.3B | 16.61 | $0.44 | +0.72% |
| MRAAF | $14.41 | -6.19% | 26.8B | 16.56 | $0.87 | +2.88% |
| HXGBF | $10.22 | +0.58% | 26.3B | 24.93 | $0.41 | +1.56% |
| TTDKY | $10.77 | +1.13% | 20.4B | 17.37 | $0.62 | +0.88% |
| TTDKF | $9.76 | +0.70% | 18.5B | 16.00 | $0.61 | +1.86% |
Stock Comparison
UNXLQ vs KYCCF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 100.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while KYCCF trades at $414.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 36.04. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs HNHPF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while HNHPF trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs HNHAF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and HNHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs HXGBY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while HXGBY trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs MRAAY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while MRAAY trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs MRAAF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while MRAAF trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs HXGBF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while HXGBF trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and HXGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs TTDKY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while TTDKY trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs TTDKF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while TTDKF trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs VEMLY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while VEMLY trades at $43.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs BYDIY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while BYDIY trades at $207.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs BYDIF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while BYDIF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs SNPTF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while SNPTF trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and SNPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs SOTGY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while SOTGY trades at $81.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs SHMZF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while SHMZF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs MNBEY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and MNBEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs MNBEF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while MNBEF trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs IBIDF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while IBIDF trades at $40.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs OMRNY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while OMRNY trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 46.13. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs AUOTY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while AUOTY trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is 35.06. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and AUOTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs SEPJF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while SEPJF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and SEPJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs KGBLY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while KGBLY trades at $30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and KGBLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs HRSEF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while HRSEF trades at $105.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs HPHTF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while HPHTF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs HPHTY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while HPHTY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs VEMLF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and VEMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs HRIBF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs SEPJY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while SEPJY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs TOPCF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while TOPCF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 746.13. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs TYOYY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while TYOYY trades at $69.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 155.33. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and TYOYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs RNSHF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while RNSHF trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs FITGF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while FITGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs APELF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and APELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs APELY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while APELY trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs CODAF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs AMANF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs NPEGF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while NPEGF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -156.79. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs VAIAF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs JELLF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while JELLF trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs NILRF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and NILRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs JNPKF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while JNPKF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs JPAVF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs BCNAF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while BCNAF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs CAZGF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while CAZGF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -134.17. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs AITUF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while AITUF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs AUDGF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while AUDGF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and AUDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs ASAAF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 763.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs BCNAY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 665M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while BCNAY trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs KRKNF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 559.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while KRKNF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs VARXF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 531.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while VARXF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs JNNDF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs HNMUF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 461.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs JPDYY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and JPDYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs KACPF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 438M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while KACPF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs HROEY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while HROEY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and HROEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs TRUHF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while TRUHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs NNFTF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and NNFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs TTGPF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 242.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while TTGPF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and TTGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs NPTSF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 211.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while NPTSF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs FUBAF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while FUBAF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -92.00. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and FUBAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs SMOPF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and SMOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs CHAEF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs HUDLF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and HUDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs ENMPF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while ENMPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs IACYF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs ENMPY Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while ENMPY trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs IKGPF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and IKGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs SDIIF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs MPAD Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs SILLF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while SILLF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs ACFN Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while ACFN trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs AATC Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while AATC trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs BMNR Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while BMNR trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs GNCLF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while GNCLF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs YNVYF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while YNVYF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs IEHC Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while IEHC trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs FGRRF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and FGRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs ERMG Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and ERMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs NSCIF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while NSCIF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and NSCIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs INRD Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs WELX Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while WELX trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs KESPF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and KESPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs AAIRF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while AAIRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs BNSOF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while BNSOF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs SCND Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while SCND trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs ROBOF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while ROBOF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs LCTC Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while LCTC trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs SIGL Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while SIGL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and SIGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs ESHSF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs RMTD Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to RMTD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs ZTSTF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while ZTSTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs DPLS Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs TRCK Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while TRCK trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs TNLX Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while TNLX trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and TNLX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UNXLQ vs UCLE Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, UCLE has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while UCLE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UCLE's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to UCLE's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to UCLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs MRRYF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs NXOPF Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs VPER Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ is less volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNXLQ.
UNXLQ vs SRMX Comparison
UNXLQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNXLQ stands at 2.9K. In comparison, SRMX has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNXLQ is priced at $0.00, while SRMX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNXLQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SRMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNXLQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SRMX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, UNXLQ and SRMX have similar daily volatility (0.00).