Uni-Select Inc.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.07B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 40.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while DNZOF trades at $14.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 38.57B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while DNZOY trades at $13.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 29.09B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while BRDCF trades at $42.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 28.78B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while BRDCY trades at $21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 27.58B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MGDDF trades at $39.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 26.73B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MGDDY trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 16.83B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CTTAF trades at $84.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 16.46B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CTTAY trades at $8.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.54B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while KNBHF trades at $96.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 15.42B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while KNRRY trades at $23.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 13.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SMTOY trades at $17.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 12.47B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while PTAIY trades at $6.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.38B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.56B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while HLLGY trades at $47.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.28B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.36B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ASEKY trades at $12.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 5.90B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while PLLIF trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NGKSY trades at $12.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SFFLY trades at $5.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while KOTMF trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while YORUF trades at $25.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while YORUY trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while FESTF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while KOTMY trades at $12.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while BRBOF trades at $9.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while STAEY trades at $9.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MNTHY trades at $49.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while LIMAF trades at $43.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while VLEEY trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while STAEF trades at $16.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while VLEEF trades at $10.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NPSKY trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NKRKY trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while JELCF trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MBUMY trades at $6.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NTXVF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while FURCF trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while PASTF trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.90M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -36.61. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.52M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while TIANF trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 868.57M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 817.55M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SFHLF trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.56M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.50M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 623.92M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while FAURY trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.71M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 419.96M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while TCISF trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 410.89M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MRETF trades at $5.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRETF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 403.30M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NMAKF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.22M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.21M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.08M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 347.10M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while XNGIF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 304.13M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ELLRY trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.70M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.64M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 253.90M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 224.68M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while IOCJY trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 184.46M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while EXCOF trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 181.27M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while AKBIF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 164.58M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.61M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158.02M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 148.71M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.47M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SCTH trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.12M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.71M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while STSGF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 37.93M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while LEAT trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.88M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27.00M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.34M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CREVF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.56M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.17M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ATHHF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.49M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while UFMG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UFMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.32M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while AFFL trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 3.44M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while AMTY trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 3.42M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while OPTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 3.02M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.

UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.58B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CDTI trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.