Uni-Select Inc.
Uni-Select Inc. UNIEF Peers
See (UNIEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNIEF | $35.96 | +0.31% | 1.6B | 24.13 | $1.49 | N/A |
| CAOHF | $0.15 | +150000.00% | 91.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FYGGY | $1.50 | N/A | 48.1B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +0.57% |
| DNZOF | $14.19 | +3.77% | 40B | 14.33 | $0.99 | +3.06% |
| DNZOY | $13.16 | -0.45% | 37.1B | 13.16 | $1.00 | +0.94% |
| BRDCF | $41.90 | N/A | 28.4B | 15.18 | $2.76 | +3.15% |
| BRDCY | $20.64 | -0.19% | 28.1B | 14.85 | $1.39 | +2.14% |
| MGDDF | $37.52 | -0.42% | 26.5B | 3.36 | $11.17 | +4.15% |
| MGDDY | $18.50 | +0.22% | 26.1B | 8.28 | $2.23 | +4.07% |
| CTTAY | $8.92 | +1.59% | 17.8B | 13.31 | $0.67 | +2.75% |
Stock Comparison
UNIEF vs CAOHF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CAOHF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs FYGGY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs DNZOF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while DNZOF trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs DNZOY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while DNZOY trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs BRDCF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while BRDCF trades at $41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs BRDCY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while BRDCY trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs MGDDF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MGDDF trades at $37.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs MGDDY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MGDDY trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs CTTAY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CTTAY trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs CTTAF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CTTAF trades at $87.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs KNRRY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while KNRRY trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs SMTOY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SMTOY trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs KNBHF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while KNBHF trades at $85.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs PTAIF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while PTAIF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs PTAIY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while PTAIY trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs HLLGY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while HLLGY trades at $49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs HLKHF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while HLKHF trades at $92.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs ASEKY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ASEKY trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs ASEKF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NGKSY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NGKSY trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs SFFLY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SFFLY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NGKSF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs PLLIF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while PLLIF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs YORUF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while YORUF trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs FESTF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while FESTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs KOTMF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while KOTMF trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs BRBOY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs YORUY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while YORUY trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs KOTMY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while KOTMY trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs SCFLF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs STAEF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while STAEF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs BRBOF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while BRBOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs MNTHY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MNTHY trades at $50.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs STAEY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while STAEY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs LIMAF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while LIMAF trades at $46.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs SMTUF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs VLEEY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while VLEEY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs VLEEF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while VLEEF trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs TDBOF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NHKGF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NHKGF trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs VTSCF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs MNTHF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs MBUMF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MBUMF trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NPSKY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NPSKY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs TGOSY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while TGOSY trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs ARBFF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ARBFF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NPSKF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NPSKF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs JEHLY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs FURCF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while FURCF trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs MBUMY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MBUMY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs GMPUF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs JELCF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while JELCF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs GUDDY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NTXVF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NTXVF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs PASTF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while PASTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NIFCY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NKRKF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NKRKF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NKRKY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 965.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NKRKY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs ATNNF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 960.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ATNNF trades at $165.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs TIANF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs GUDHF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 867.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs SFHLF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 848M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SFHLF trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs ABDDF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs PWRHF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 647.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while PWRHF trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 40.25. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs FAURY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 623.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while FAURY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FAURY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs FCVFF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs MRETF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while MRETF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs TCISF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs SAEOF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs VTSCY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs UFMG Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 386M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while UFMG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NMAKF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 338.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NMAKF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs ELLRY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 335.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ELLRY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NPSGF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs EGKLF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while EGKLF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs CCEGF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 257M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CCEGF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -116.67. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NPSGY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 253.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NPSGY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs IOCJY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while IOCJY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs XNGIF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs CMMCF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CMMCF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs AKBIF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while AKBIF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs EXCOF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 196.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while EXCOF trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs SCTH Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SCTH trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -463.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs AMGRF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs HWAFF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs WLMTF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 138.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while WLMTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs KGAUF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 130.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while KGAUF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs LEAT Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while LEAT trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -160.40. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs STSGF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NWFAF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs VOAXF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs CREVF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs ATHHF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while ATHHF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs OPTI Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs NFGRF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs AFFL Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while AFFL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs AMTY Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while AMTY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs SPKTF Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.
UNIEF vs CDTI Comparison
UNIEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNIEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNIEF is priced at $35.96, while CDTI trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNIEF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, UNIEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNIEF is more volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNIEF.