Umpqua Holdings Corporation

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 188.17B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while HDB trades at $73.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 70.67B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while PNC trades at $178.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 70.59B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while USB-PS trades at $18.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 70.20B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while USB-PP trades at $22.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 69.97B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while USB-PA trades at $845.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 240.74. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 69.89B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while USB-PH trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 69.78B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while USB trades at $44.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 68.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while ITUB trades at $6.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 64.56B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while MFG trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 61.59B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while LYG trades at $4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 61.11B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while IBN trades at $34.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 55.48B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while DB trades at $28.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 54.23B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while TFC trades at $41.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -217.95. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 40.36B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while BSBR trades at $5.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.97B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while HBANL trades at $25.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.57B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while HBANM trades at $22.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 31.25B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while TFC-PI trades at $23.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 30.07B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while MTB trades at $187.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.53B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while TFC-PO trades at $21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 27.40B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while BBD trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 27.07B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while BBDO trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 26.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FITB trades at $39.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.75B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while HBANP trades at $17.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 25.74B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FCNCO trades at $22.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 25.60B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FCNCP trades at $21.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.57B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while USB-PR trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 25.55B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FCNCA trades at $1,937.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 25.36B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while KB trades at $68.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.67B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while TFC-PR trades at $18.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 24.02B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while USB-PQ trades at $15.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 23.48B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while HBAN trades at $16.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 23.06B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while RF-PF trades at $25.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 20.27B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while RF trades at $22.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 20.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while RF-PC trades at $23.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 18.31B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while KEY-PL trades at $24.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 18.26B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while KEY-PK trades at $21.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 18.23B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while KEY-PI trades at $25.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 18.15B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 18.08B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while KEY trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -86.82. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 18.04B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while CFG trades at $41.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 17.01B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FITBI trades at $25.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.35B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FITBP trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 15.84B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while SHG trades at $31.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 15.83B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while BCH trades at $31.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.65B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while RF-PE trades at $17.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 15.39B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while BAP trades at $193.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.91B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 14.42B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FITBO trades at $21.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FHN-PB trades at $25.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.66B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FHN-PC trades at $24.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.22B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while CFG-PH trades at $26.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.10B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FHN-PE trades at $23.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 10.99B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while CIB trades at $41.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 10.47B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while GGAL trades at $63.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.31B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FHN trades at $20.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 9.65B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while WF trades at $39.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.28B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while SSB trades at $91.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FHN-PF trades at $17.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.89B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 8.83B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while WBS trades at $52.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.75B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while CBSH trades at $65.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.58B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while PNFP trades at $110.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.53B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while WAL trades at $77.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.46B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while CFR trades at $131.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.32B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while CFG-PE trades at $19.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 8.19B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while WTFCM trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 8.19B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while ONBPO trades at $24.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 8.17B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while ONBPP trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.17B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while WTFC trades at $122.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.11B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while UMBF trades at $106.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.11B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while ONB trades at $21.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.70B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while CMA trades at $58.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.24B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while ZION trades at $49.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.21B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while BPOP trades at $105.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.93B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while PB trades at $72.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while SNV-PD trades at $24.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.84B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while SNV trades at $49.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.28B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while BOKF trades at $97.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while BMA trades at $96.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while CADE trades at $31.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.77B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while HOMB trades at $29.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while UBSI trades at $37.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.28B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while OZK trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while BXS trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while COLB trades at $24.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FLG trades at $12.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FNB trades at $14.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while VLYPP trades at $25.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while FFIN trades at $35.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.09B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while VLYPO trades at $24.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while VLY trades at $9.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while HWC trades at $56.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while GBCI trades at $42.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while HWCPZ trades at $24.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, BBAR has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while BBAR trades at $22.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas BBAR's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is less volatile compared to BBAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, AUBAP has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while AUBAP trades at $25.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas AUBAP's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUBAP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to AUBAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, NYCB has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while NYCB trades at $10.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas NYCB's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NYCB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is less volatile compared to NYCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.

UMPQ plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMPQ stands at 3.83B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UMPQ is priced at $17.66, while ABCB trades at $63.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMPQ currently has a P/E ratio of 8.92, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, UMPQ's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMPQ is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMPQ.