United Malt Group Limited
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for UMLGF
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for UMLGF
United Malt Group Limited (UMLGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UMLGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMLGF | $2.70 | -16.67% | 809.3M | 90.00 | $0.03 | N/A |
| BUDFF | $76.00 | +0.27% | 147.5B | 22.42 | $3.39 | +1.72% |
| HEINY | $40.32 | +1.15% | 45.2B | 20.38 | $1.98 | +2.71% |
| HINKF | $80.04 | +0.00% | 44.9B | 20.31 | $3.94 | +2.72% |
| FMXUF | $11.35 | +0.00% | 23.3B | 24.15 | $0.47 | +6.96% |
| HKHHY | $37.40 | +1.22% | 20.8B | 18.92 | $1.98 | +2.52% |
| HKHHF | $74.50 | +0.40% | 20.6B | 18.86 | $3.95 | +2.92% |
| CABHF | $149.10 | +0.00% | 19.7B | 19.19 | $7.77 | +3.05% |
| CABGY | $26.65 | +2.78% | 17.6B | 19.31 | $1.38 | +3.49% |
| CABJF | $127.46 | -4.17% | 16.8B | 18.21 | $7.00 | +3.59% |
Stock Comparison
UMLGF vs BUDFF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BUDFF has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BUDFF trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BUDFF's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BUDFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BUDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BUDFF's competition here
UMLGF vs HEINY Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HEINY has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HEINY trades at $40.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HEINY's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HEINY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HEINY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HEINY's competition here
UMLGF vs HINKF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HINKF has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HINKF trades at $80.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HINKF's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HINKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HINKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HINKF's competition here
UMLGF vs FMXUF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, FMXUF has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while FMXUF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas FMXUF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMXUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to FMXUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check FMXUF's competition here
UMLGF vs HKHHY Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HKHHY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HKHHY trades at $37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HKHHY's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HKHHY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HKHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HKHHY's competition here
UMLGF vs HKHHF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HKHHF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HKHHF trades at $74.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HKHHF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HKHHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HKHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HKHHF's competition here
UMLGF vs CABHF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CABHF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CABHF trades at $149.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CABHF's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CABHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CABHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CABHF's competition here
UMLGF vs CABGY Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CABGY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CABGY trades at $26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CABGY's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CABGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CABGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CABGY's competition here
UMLGF vs CABJF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CABJF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CABJF trades at $127.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CABJF's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CABJF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CABJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CABJF's competition here
UMLGF vs ASBRF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, ASBRF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while ASBRF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas ASBRF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASBRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to ASBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check ASBRF's competition here
UMLGF vs KNBWY Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, KNBWY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while KNBWY trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas KNBWY's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KNBWY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to KNBWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check KNBWY's competition here
UMLGF vs KNBWF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, KNBWF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while KNBWF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas KNBWF's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KNBWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to KNBWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check KNBWF's competition here
UMLGF vs BDWBF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BDWBF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BDWBF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BDWBF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BDWBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BDWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BDWBF's competition here
UMLGF vs BDWBY Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BDWBY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BDWBY trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BDWBY's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BDWBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BDWBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BDWBY's competition here
UMLGF vs CRHKF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CRHKF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CRHKF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CRHKF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRHKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CRHKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CRHKF's competition here
UMLGF vs CRHKY Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CRHKY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CRHKY trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CRHKY's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRHKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CRHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CRHKY's competition here
UMLGF vs TSGTF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, TSGTF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while TSGTF trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas TSGTF's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TSGTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to TSGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check TSGTF's competition here
UMLGF vs TSGTY Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, TSGTY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while TSGTY trades at $30.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas TSGTY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TSGTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to TSGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check TSGTY's competition here
UMLGF vs MXGBF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, MXGBF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while MXGBF trades at $48.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas MXGBF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MXGBF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to MXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check MXGBF's competition here
UMLGF vs STBFY Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, STBFY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while STBFY trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas STBFY's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STBFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to STBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check STBFY's competition here
UMLGF vs STBFF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, STBFF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while STBFF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas STBFF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STBFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to STBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check STBFF's competition here
UMLGF vs SOOBF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, SOOBF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while SOOBF trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas SOOBF's P/E ratio is 162.10. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOOBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is less volatile compared to SOOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check SOOBF's competition here
UMLGF vs ROYUF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, ROYUF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while ROYUF trades at $73.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas ROYUF's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROYUF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to ROYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check ROYUF's competition here
UMLGF vs AEBZY Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, AEBZY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while AEBZY trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas AEBZY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEBZY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to AEBZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check AEBZY's competition here
UMLGF vs CCGPY Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CCGPY has a market cap of 631.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CCGPY trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CCGPY's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CCGPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CCGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CCGPY's competition here
UMLGF vs CGPZF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CGPZF has a market cap of 589.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CGPZF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CGPZF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGPZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CGPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CGPZF's competition here
UMLGF vs BIBLF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BIBLF has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BIBLF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BIBLF's P/E ratio is 146.00. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIBLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BIBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BIBLF's competition here
UMLGF vs SMGLF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, SMGLF has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while SMGLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas SMGLF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMGLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to SMGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check SMGLF's competition here
UMLGF vs BRBMF Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BRBMF has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BRBMF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BRBMF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRBMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BRBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BRBMF's competition here
UMLGF vs EARI Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, EARI has a market cap of 785.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while EARI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas EARI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EARI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is less volatile compared to EARI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check EARI's competition here
UMLGF vs HVCW Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HVCW has a market cap of 770.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HVCW's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HVCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HVCW's competition here
UMLGF vs SIPC Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, SIPC has a market cap of 309.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while SIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas SIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIPC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to SIPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check SIPC's competition here
UMLGF vs MRIB Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, MRIB has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while MRIB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas MRIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRIB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is less volatile compared to MRIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check MRIB's competition here
UMLGF vs MENB Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, MENB has a market cap of 126. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while MENB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas MENB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MENB's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is less volatile compared to MENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check MENB's competition here
UMLGF vs GBEN Comparison April 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, GBEN has a market cap of 7. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while GBEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas GBEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GBEN's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is less volatile compared to GBEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check GBEN's competition here