United Malt Group Limited
United Malt Group Limited (UMLGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UMLGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMLGF | $2.70 | -16.67% | 809.3M | 90.00 | $0.03 | N/A |
| BUDFF | $63.84 | +1.24% | 127.4B | 18.24 | $3.50 | +1.78% |
| HINKF | $84.06 | +2.51% | 47B | 22.30 | $3.77 | +2.60% |
| HEINY | $41.37 | +1.10% | 46.4B | 21.96 | $1.89 | +2.53% |
| ASBRF | $13.78 | +7.07% | 20.7B | 17.67 | $0.78 | +2.54% |
| HKHHY | $36.37 | +1.65% | 20.5B | 19.09 | $1.90 | +1.20% |
| HKHHF | $71.65 | +0.35% | 19.4B | 18.81 | $3.81 | +3.05% |
| FMXUF | $8.50 | +0.00% | 17.5B | 23.61 | $0.36 | +6.68% |
| CABGY | $24.50 | +1.16% | 16.2B | 15.59 | $1.57 | +3.21% |
| CABHF | $121.00 | +0.00% | 16B | 16.83 | $7.19 | +3.27% |
Stock Comparison
UMLGF vs BUDFF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BUDFF has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BUDFF trades at $63.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BUDFF's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BUDFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BUDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BUDFF's competition here
UMLGF vs HINKF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HINKF has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HINKF trades at $84.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HINKF's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HINKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HINKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HINKF's competition here
UMLGF vs HEINY Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HEINY has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HEINY trades at $41.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HEINY's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HEINY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HEINY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HEINY's competition here
UMLGF vs ASBRF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, ASBRF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while ASBRF trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas ASBRF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASBRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to ASBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check ASBRF's competition here
UMLGF vs HKHHY Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HKHHY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HKHHY trades at $36.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HKHHY's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HKHHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HKHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HKHHY's competition here
UMLGF vs HKHHF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HKHHF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HKHHF trades at $71.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HKHHF's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HKHHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HKHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HKHHF's competition here
UMLGF vs FMXUF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, FMXUF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while FMXUF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas FMXUF's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMXUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to FMXUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check FMXUF's competition here
UMLGF vs CABGY Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CABGY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CABGY trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CABGY's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CABGY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CABGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CABGY's competition here
UMLGF vs CABHF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CABHF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CABHF trades at $121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CABHF's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CABHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is less volatile compared to CABHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CABHF's competition here
UMLGF vs CABJF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CABJF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CABJF trades at $117.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CABJF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CABJF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CABJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CABJF's competition here
UMLGF vs BDWBF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BDWBF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BDWBF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BDWBF's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BDWBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BDWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BDWBF's competition here
UMLGF vs CRHKY Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CRHKY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CRHKY trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CRHKY's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRHKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CRHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CRHKY's competition here
UMLGF vs KNBWY Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, KNBWY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while KNBWY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas KNBWY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KNBWY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to KNBWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check KNBWY's competition here
UMLGF vs CRHKF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CRHKF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CRHKF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CRHKF's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRHKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CRHKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CRHKF's competition here
UMLGF vs TSGTF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, TSGTF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while TSGTF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas TSGTF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TSGTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to TSGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check TSGTF's competition here
UMLGF vs KNBWF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, KNBWF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while KNBWF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas KNBWF's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KNBWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to KNBWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check KNBWF's competition here
UMLGF vs TSGTY Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, TSGTY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while TSGTY trades at $31.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas TSGTY's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TSGTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to TSGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check TSGTY's competition here
UMLGF vs MXGBF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, MXGBF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while MXGBF trades at $51.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas MXGBF's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MXGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to MXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check MXGBF's competition here
UMLGF vs STBFY Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, STBFY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while STBFY trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas STBFY's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STBFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to STBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check STBFY's competition here
UMLGF vs STBFF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, STBFF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while STBFF trades at $30.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas STBFF's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to STBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check STBFF's competition here
UMLGF vs BDWBY Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BDWBY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BDWBY trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BDWBY's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BDWBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BDWBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BDWBY's competition here
UMLGF vs ROYUF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, ROYUF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while ROYUF trades at $73.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas ROYUF's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROYUF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to ROYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check ROYUF's competition here
UMLGF vs SOOBF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, SOOBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while SOOBF trades at $42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas SOOBF's P/E ratio is 49.53. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOOBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to SOOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check SOOBF's competition here
UMLGF vs AEBZY Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, AEBZY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while AEBZY trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas AEBZY's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEBZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to AEBZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check AEBZY's competition here
UMLGF vs CCGPY Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CCGPY has a market cap of 945.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CCGPY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CCGPY's P/E ratio is 61.67. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CCGPY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CCGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CCGPY's competition here
UMLGF vs CGPZF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CGPZF has a market cap of 885.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CGPZF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CGPZF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGPZF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CGPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CGPZF's competition here
UMLGF vs BIBLF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BIBLF has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BIBLF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BIBLF's P/E ratio is 146.00. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIBLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BIBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BIBLF's competition here
UMLGF vs SMGLF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, SMGLF has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while SMGLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas SMGLF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMGLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to SMGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check SMGLF's competition here
UMLGF vs BRBMF Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BRBMF has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BRBMF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BRBMF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRBMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BRBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BRBMF's competition here
UMLGF vs HVCW Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HVCW has a market cap of 770.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HVCW's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HVCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HVCW's competition here
UMLGF vs EARI Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, EARI has a market cap of 338.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while EARI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas EARI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EARI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to EARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check EARI's competition here
UMLGF vs SIPC Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, SIPC has a market cap of 275.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while SIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas SIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIPC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to SIPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check SIPC's competition here
UMLGF vs MRIB Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, MRIB has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while MRIB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas MRIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRIB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is less volatile compared to MRIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check MRIB's competition here
UMLGF vs MENB Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, MENB has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while MENB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas MENB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MENB's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to MENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check MENB's competition here
UMLGF vs GBEN Comparison August 2025
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, GBEN has a market cap of 7. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while GBEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas GBEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GBEN's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is less volatile compared to GBEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check GBEN's competition here