United Malt Group Limited
United Malt Group Limited (UMLGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UMLGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMLGF | $2.70 | -16.67% | 809.3M | 90.00 | $0.03 | N/A |
| BUDFF | $72.87 | -0.14% | 141.8B | 21.50 | $3.39 | +1.72% |
| HINKF | $83.14 | +1.68% | 46.6B | 21.32 | $3.90 | +2.67% |
| HEINY | $40.98 | +0.66% | 45.9B | 21.02 | $1.95 | +2.01% |
| FMXUF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 22.6B | 25.00 | $0.44 | +7.18% |
| HKHHY | $38.28 | +1.22% | 21.3B | 19.53 | $1.96 | +2.21% |
| HKHHF | $75.71 | +3.36% | 21B | 19.36 | $3.91 | +2.98% |
| CABHF | $149.10 | +0.00% | 19.7B | 19.19 | $7.77 | +2.65% |
| CABJF | $139.57 | +5.18% | 18.4B | 20.11 | $6.94 | +2.98% |
| CABGY | $27.43 | +1.71% | 18.1B | 19.73 | $1.39 | +2.92% |
Stock Comparison
UMLGF vs BUDFF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BUDFF has a market cap of 141.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BUDFF trades at $72.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BUDFF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BUDFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BUDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BUDFF's competition here
UMLGF vs HINKF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HINKF has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HINKF trades at $83.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HINKF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HINKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HINKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HINKF's competition here
UMLGF vs HEINY Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HEINY has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HEINY trades at $40.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HEINY's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HEINY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HEINY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HEINY's competition here
UMLGF vs FMXUF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, FMXUF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while FMXUF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas FMXUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMXUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to FMXUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check FMXUF's competition here
UMLGF vs HKHHY Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HKHHY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HKHHY trades at $38.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HKHHY's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HKHHY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HKHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HKHHY's competition here
UMLGF vs HKHHF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HKHHF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HKHHF trades at $75.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HKHHF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HKHHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HKHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HKHHF's competition here
UMLGF vs CABHF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CABHF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CABHF trades at $149.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CABHF's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CABHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CABHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CABHF's competition here
UMLGF vs CABJF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CABJF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CABJF trades at $139.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CABJF's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CABJF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CABJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CABJF's competition here
UMLGF vs CABGY Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CABGY has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CABGY trades at $27.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CABGY's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CABGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CABGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CABGY's competition here
UMLGF vs SOOBF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, SOOBF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while SOOBF trades at $40.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas SOOBF's P/E ratio is 678.67. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOOBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to SOOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check SOOBF's competition here
UMLGF vs ASBRF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, ASBRF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while ASBRF trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas ASBRF's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to ASBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check ASBRF's competition here
UMLGF vs KNBWY Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, KNBWY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while KNBWY trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas KNBWY's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KNBWY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to KNBWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check KNBWY's competition here
UMLGF vs BDWBF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BDWBF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BDWBF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BDWBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BDWBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BDWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BDWBF's competition here
UMLGF vs KNBWF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, KNBWF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while KNBWF trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas KNBWF's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KNBWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to KNBWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check KNBWF's competition here
UMLGF vs BDWBY Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BDWBY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BDWBY trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BDWBY's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BDWBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BDWBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BDWBY's competition here
UMLGF vs CRHKF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CRHKF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CRHKF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CRHKF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRHKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CRHKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CRHKF's competition here
UMLGF vs CRHKY Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CRHKY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CRHKY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CRHKY's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRHKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CRHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CRHKY's competition here
UMLGF vs TSGTF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, TSGTF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while TSGTF trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas TSGTF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TSGTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to TSGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check TSGTF's competition here
UMLGF vs TSGTY Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, TSGTY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while TSGTY trades at $31.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas TSGTY's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TSGTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to TSGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check TSGTY's competition here
UMLGF vs MXGBF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, MXGBF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while MXGBF trades at $45.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas MXGBF's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MXGBF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to MXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check MXGBF's competition here
UMLGF vs STBFF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, STBFF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while STBFF trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas STBFF's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STBFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to STBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check STBFF's competition here
UMLGF vs STBFY Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, STBFY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while STBFY trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas STBFY's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STBFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to STBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check STBFY's competition here
UMLGF vs ROYUF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, ROYUF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while ROYUF trades at $65.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas ROYUF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROYUF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to ROYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check ROYUF's competition here
UMLGF vs AEBZY Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, AEBZY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while AEBZY trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas AEBZY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEBZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to AEBZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check AEBZY's competition here
UMLGF vs CGPZF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CGPZF has a market cap of 589.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CGPZF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CGPZF's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGPZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CGPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CGPZF's competition here
UMLGF vs CCGPY Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, CCGPY has a market cap of 570.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while CCGPY trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas CCGPY's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CCGPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to CCGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check CCGPY's competition here
UMLGF vs BIBLF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BIBLF has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BIBLF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BIBLF's P/E ratio is 146.00. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIBLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BIBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BIBLF's competition here
UMLGF vs SMGLF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, SMGLF has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while SMGLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas SMGLF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMGLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to SMGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check SMGLF's competition here
UMLGF vs BRBMF Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, BRBMF has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while BRBMF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas BRBMF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRBMF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to BRBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check BRBMF's competition here
UMLGF vs EARI Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, EARI has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while EARI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas EARI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EARI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to EARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check EARI's competition here
UMLGF vs HVCW Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, HVCW has a market cap of 770.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while HVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas HVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HVCW's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to HVCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check HVCW's competition here
UMLGF vs SIPC Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, SIPC has a market cap of 447.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while SIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas SIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIPC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to SIPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check SIPC's competition here
UMLGF vs MRIB Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, MRIB has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while MRIB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas MRIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRIB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is less volatile compared to MRIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check MRIB's competition here
UMLGF vs MENB Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, MENB has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while MENB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas MENB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MENB's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is more volatile compared to MENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check MENB's competition here
UMLGF vs GBEN Comparison March 2026
UMLGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMLGF stands at 809.3M. In comparison, GBEN has a market cap of 7. Regarding current trading prices, UMLGF is priced at $2.70, while GBEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMLGF currently has a P/E ratio of 90.00, whereas GBEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMLGF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GBEN's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UMLGF is less volatile compared to GBEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMLGF.Check GBEN's competition here