Universal Music Group N.V.
Universal Music Group N.V. UMGNF Peers
See (UMGNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMGNF | $30.59 | -2.58% | 56.1B | 23.17 | $1.32 | +2.16% |
| UNVGY | $15.32 | -2.42% | 57.8B | 23.57 | $0.65 | +2.28% |
| FWONB | $90.00 | N/A | 31B | 1800.00 | $0.05 | N/A |
| BOIVF | $6.00 | -1.17% | 16.7B | 99.98 | $0.06 | +2.02% |
| NWSAL | $26.80 | N/A | 16.4B | 43.23 | $0.62 | +0.75% |
| CEVMF | $125.65 | N/A | 12.1B | 35.20 | $3.57 | +1.51% |
| CEVMY | $30.74 | -3.50% | 11.8B | 34.54 | $0.89 | +0.96% |
| VIVEF | $10.49 | +2.64% | 10.6B | 22.80 | $0.46 | N/A |
| TKCOF | $43.45 | N/A | 7.2B | 21.62 | $2.01 | +0.56% |
| TOEAF | $21.49 | -5.09% | 4.4B | 26.86 | $0.80 | +0.01% |
Stock Comparison
UMGNF vs UNVGY Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while UNVGY trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs FWONB Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while FWONB trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is 1800.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FWONB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to FWONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs BOIVF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while BOIVF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 99.98. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs NWSAL Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CEVMF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CEVMF trades at $125.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CEVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CEVMY Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CEVMY trades at $30.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CEVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs VIVEF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to VIVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs TKCOF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, TKCOF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while TKCOF trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TKCOF's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TKCOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to TKCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs TOEAF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, TOEAF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while TOEAF trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TOEAF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TOEAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to TOEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs VIVHY Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while VIVHY trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -15.64. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs MCHOY Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while MCHOY trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is 43.02. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MCHOY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to MCHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CYFWF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CYFWF trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to CYFWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs MCOIF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while MCOIF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MCOIF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to MCOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CYFWY Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CYFWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs NANHF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while NANHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to NANHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs NNMTF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to NNMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs JVTSF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while JVTSF trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -396.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to JVTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs ATVDY Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while ATVDY trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ATVDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs NENTY Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while NENTY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to NENTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs NENTF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while NENTF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -14.94. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs MHSDF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while MHSDF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to MHSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs AIOSF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while AIOSF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to AIOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs TCLRY Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to TCLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CIEZF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 671.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CIEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CPXGF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 532.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CPXGF trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -9.23. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs BORUF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 476.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while BORUF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BORUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to BORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs DTTVY Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 377.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while DTTVY trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to DTTVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs IMXCF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while IMXCF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to IMXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs WLDBF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 318.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while WLDBF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +30.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs AFCJF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while AFCJF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CLQDF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CLQDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CLQDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CLTFF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CLTFF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs APTTF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while APTTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to APTTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to APTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs STEAF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while STEAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to STEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs ANGMF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ANGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs GOAI Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, GOAI has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while GOAI trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GOAI's P/E ratio is -28.57. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GOAI's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to GOAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs ICABY Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while ICABY trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs THBRF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while THBRF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs GMSQF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs ZUMRF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ZUMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs LGMH Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while LGMH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to LGMH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs APHP Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while APHP trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -22.99. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to APHP's ROE of +6.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to APHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs OAMCF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while OAMCF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to OAMCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs ASGRF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ASGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs FMYR Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, FMYR has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while FMYR trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas FMYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FMYR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to FMYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs QYOUF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while QYOUF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to QYOUF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to QYOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CNWGQ Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs XOEEF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to XOEEF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs BBOP Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while BBOP trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BBOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to BBOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs HWAL Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while HWAL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs GULDF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while GULDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GULDF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CNNWQ Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs MVNC Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while MVNC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs ICABF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, ICABF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while ICABF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ICABF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ICABF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ICABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs BLIBQ Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to BLIBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs HHSE Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while HHSE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs AMFL Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while AMFL trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs LTES Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while LTES trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to LTES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs STGZ Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while STGZ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to STGZ's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs BLIAQ Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while BLIAQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to BLIAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CAPV Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CAPV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs ITVI Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while ITVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ITVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs AMXX Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, AMXX has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while AMXX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas AMXX's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AMXX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to AMXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs NETWF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while NETWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to NETWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs ENTEF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while ENTEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ENTEF's ROE of -7.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to ENTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs BSEG Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while BSEG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to BSEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs HDUP Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while HDUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to HDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs EEGI Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while EEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs TRMNF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while TRMNF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to TRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs STCXF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, STCXF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while STCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas STCXF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to STCXF's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to STCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs VNUE Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while VNUE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs SEGI Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while SEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to SEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs AFOM Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, AFOM has a market cap of 925.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while AFOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas AFOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AFOM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to AFOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs HQGE Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 774K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while HQGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HQGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to HQGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs AMNNF Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, AMNNF has a market cap of 736.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while AMNNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas AMNNF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AMNNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to AMNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs UMGP Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 711.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while UMGP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to UMGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs RLTR Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 640.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while RLTR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to RLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs HYWI Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, HYWI has a market cap of 507K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while HYWI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas HYWI's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HYWI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to HYWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CCLX Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CCLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to CCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs WRIT Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 481.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while WRIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to WRIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs TAMG Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while TAMG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to TAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs BOTY Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 460.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while BOTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BOTY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs WEBB Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while WEBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to WEBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs IMTV Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 313.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while IMTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to IMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs VGTL Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 308.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while VGTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs TCEC Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, TCEC has a market cap of 303.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while TCEC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TCEC's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TCEC's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to TCEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs CEXE Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while CEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CEXE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs RIVU Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while RIVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to RIVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs MIKP Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while MIKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to MIKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs IFLM Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, IFLM has a market cap of 194.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while IFLM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas IFLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to IFLM's ROE of +3.55%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to IFLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs MLFB Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while MLFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to MLFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs BRSE Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, BRSE has a market cap of 123.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while BRSE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BRSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BRSE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to BRSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs SNMN Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while SNMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to SNMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs RWMI Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 86.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while RWMI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to RWMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs PLFX Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 85.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while PLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to PLFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs SAPX Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, SAPX has a market cap of 73.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while SAPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SAPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to SAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs AFTM Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, AFTM has a market cap of 70.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while AFTM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas AFTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AFTM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to AFTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs URBT Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while URBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to URBT's ROE of +67.97%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to URBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.
UMGNF vs GBHL Comparison
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 56.1B. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $30.59, while GBHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GBHL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to GBHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.