Universal Music Group N.V.
Universal Music Group N.V. (UMGNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UMGNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMGNF | $22.93 | +0.02% | 42.7B | 13.95 | $1.67 | +2.56% |
| UNVGY | $11.41 | +0.00% | 42.4B | 13.75 | $0.84 | +2.27% |
| FWONB | $79.00 | +0.00% | 19.7B | -141.07 | -$0.56 | N/A |
| NWSAL | $26.80 | +0.00% | 17.1B | 43.23 | $0.62 | +0.74% |
| BOIVF | $5.70 | -0.35% | 15.9B | 40.75 | $0.14 | +1.62% |
| VIVEF | $10.49 | +2.64% | 10.6B | 22.80 | $0.46 | +0.43% |
| CEVMF | $94.15 | +0.00% | 9B | 26.60 | $3.54 | +2.06% |
| TKCOF | $52.10 | +0.00% | 8.8B | 27.57 | $1.89 | +1.19% |
| CEVMY | $18.70 | -5.33% | 7.2B | 21.25 | $0.88 | +1.59% |
| TOEAF | $16.50 | +0.00% | 3.4B | 21.43 | $0.77 | +1.66% |
Stock Comparison
UMGNF vs UNVGY Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while UNVGY trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check UNVGY's competition here
UMGNF vs FWONB Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while FWONB trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is -141.07. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to FWONB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to FWONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check FWONB's competition here
UMGNF vs NWSAL Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check NWSAL's competition here
UMGNF vs BOIVF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while BOIVF trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 40.75. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BOIVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check BOIVF's competition here
UMGNF vs VIVEF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to VIVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check VIVEF's competition here
UMGNF vs CEVMF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CEVMF trades at $94.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CEVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CEVMF's competition here
UMGNF vs TKCOF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, TKCOF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while TKCOF trades at $52.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas TKCOF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TKCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to TKCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check TKCOF's competition here
UMGNF vs CEVMY Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CEVMY trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CEVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CEVMY's competition here
UMGNF vs TOEAF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, TOEAF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while TOEAF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas TOEAF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TOEAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to TOEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check TOEAF's competition here
UMGNF vs MCOIF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while MCOIF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MCOIF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to MCOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check MCOIF's competition here
UMGNF vs MCHOY Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while MCHOY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MCHOY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to MCHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check MCHOY's competition here
UMGNF vs VIVHY Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while VIVHY trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -13.39. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check VIVHY's competition here
UMGNF vs NANHF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while NANHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to NANHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check NANHF's competition here
UMGNF vs MHSDF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while MHSDF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 44.25. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to MHSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check MHSDF's competition here
UMGNF vs NNMTF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to NNMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check NNMTF's competition here
UMGNF vs CYFWF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CYFWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CYFWF's competition here
UMGNF vs ATVDY Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while ATVDY trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ATVDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check ATVDY's competition here
UMGNF vs CYFWY Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CYFWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CYFWY's competition here
UMGNF vs AIOSF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while AIOSF trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to AIOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check AIOSF's competition here
UMGNF vs JVTSF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while JVTSF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to JVTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check JVTSF's competition here
UMGNF vs TCLRY Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to TCLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check TCLRY's competition here
UMGNF vs CIEZF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 671.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CIEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CIEZF's competition here
UMGNF vs NENTF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 637M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while NENTF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -14.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check NENTF's competition here
UMGNF vs CPXGF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 451.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CPXGF trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -16.56. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CPXGF's competition here
UMGNF vs BORUF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 417.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while BORUF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BORUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to BORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check BORUF's competition here
UMGNF vs IMXCF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 321.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while IMXCF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to IMXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check IMXCF's competition here
UMGNF vs CLTFF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 247.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CLTFF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CLTFF's competition here
UMGNF vs WLDBF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 203M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while WLDBF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check WLDBF's competition here
UMGNF vs NENTY Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while NENTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to NENTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check NENTY's competition here
UMGNF vs CLQDF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CLQDF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CLQDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CLQDF's competition here
UMGNF vs AFCJF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 192.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while AFCJF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check AFCJF's competition here
UMGNF vs ICABY Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while ICABY trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check ICABY's competition here
UMGNF vs STEAF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while STEAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to STEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check STEAF's competition here
UMGNF vs ANGMF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ANGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check ANGMF's competition here
UMGNF vs APTTF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while APTTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to APTTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to APTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check APTTF's competition here
UMGNF vs THBRF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while THBRF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check THBRF's competition here
UMGNF vs GULDF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while GULDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to GULDF's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check GULDF's competition here
UMGNF vs GMSQF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check GMSQF's competition here
UMGNF vs ZUMRF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ZUMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check ZUMRF's competition here
UMGNF vs LGMH Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while LGMH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to LGMH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check LGMH's competition here
UMGNF vs OAMCF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while OAMCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to OAMCF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check OAMCF's competition here
UMGNF vs ASGRF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ASGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check ASGRF's competition here
UMGNF vs QYOUF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while QYOUF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to QYOUF's ROE of +42.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to QYOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check QYOUF's competition here
UMGNF vs APHP Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while APHP trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to APHP's ROE of +2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to APHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check APHP's competition here
UMGNF vs MVNC Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while MVNC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check MVNC's competition here
UMGNF vs CNWGQ Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CNWGQ's competition here
UMGNF vs XOEEF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to XOEEF's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check XOEEF's competition here
UMGNF vs BBOP Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while BBOP trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BBOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to BBOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check BBOP's competition here
UMGNF vs HWAL Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while HWAL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check HWAL's competition here
UMGNF vs HHSE Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while HHSE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check HHSE's competition here
UMGNF vs CNNWQ Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CNNWQ's competition here
UMGNF vs TRMNF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while TRMNF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to TRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check TRMNF's competition here
UMGNF vs ENTEF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while ENTEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ENTEF's ROE of +23.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to ENTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check ENTEF's competition here
UMGNF vs ICABF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ICABF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while ICABF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas ICABF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ICABF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ICABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check ICABF's competition here
UMGNF vs ABQQD Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ABQQD has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while ABQQD trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas ABQQD's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ABQQD's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to ABQQD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check ABQQD's competition here
UMGNF vs URBT Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while URBT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to URBT's ROE of +67.97%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to URBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check URBT's competition here
UMGNF vs STGZ Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while STGZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to STGZ's ROE of +4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check STGZ's competition here
UMGNF vs AMFL Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while AMFL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check AMFL's competition here
UMGNF vs HQGE Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while HQGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HQGE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to HQGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check HQGE's competition here
UMGNF vs LTES Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while LTES trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to LTES's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check LTES's competition here
UMGNF vs BLIAQ Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while BLIAQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to BLIAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check BLIAQ's competition here
UMGNF vs CAPV Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CAPV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CAPV's competition here
UMGNF vs ITVI Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while ITVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to ITVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check ITVI's competition here
UMGNF vs HOFV Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while HOFV trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check HOFV's competition here
UMGNF vs BSEG Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while BSEG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to BSEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check BSEG's competition here
UMGNF vs EEGI Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while EEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check EEGI's competition here
UMGNF vs UMGP Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while UMGP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to UMGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check UMGP's competition here
UMGNF vs NETWF Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while NETWF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to NETWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check NETWF's competition here
UMGNF vs VYRE Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, VYRE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while VYRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas VYRE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to VYRE's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to VYRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check VYRE's competition here
UMGNF vs IMTV Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while IMTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to IMTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check IMTV's competition here
UMGNF vs HDUP Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 947K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while HDUP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to HDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check HDUP's competition here
UMGNF vs AFOM Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, AFOM has a market cap of 925.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while AFOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas AFOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AFOM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to AFOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check AFOM's competition here
UMGNF vs RLTR Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 709.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while RLTR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to RLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check RLTR's competition here
UMGNF vs SEGI Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 685.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while SEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to SEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check SEGI's competition here
UMGNF vs WRIT Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 542.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while WRIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to WRIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check WRIT's competition here
UMGNF vs RWMI Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 539.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while RWMI trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to RWMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check RWMI's competition here
UMGNF vs BOTY Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 504K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while BOTY trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BOTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check BOTY's competition here
UMGNF vs CCLX Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CCLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CCLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CCLX's competition here
UMGNF vs TAMG Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while TAMG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to TAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check TAMG's competition here
UMGNF vs WEBB Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while WEBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to WEBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check WEBB's competition here
UMGNF vs CEXE Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while CEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to CEXE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check CEXE's competition here
UMGNF vs RIVU Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while RIVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to RIVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check RIVU's competition here
UMGNF vs MIKP Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while MIKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to MIKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check MIKP's competition here
UMGNF vs PLFX Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 212.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while PLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to PLFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check PLFX's competition here
UMGNF vs VGTL Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 205.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while VGTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check VGTL's competition here
UMGNF vs DTTVY Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 190.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while DTTVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to DTTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check DTTVY's competition here
UMGNF vs EVLI Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, EVLI has a market cap of 169K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while EVLI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas EVLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to EVLI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to EVLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check EVLI's competition here
UMGNF vs MLFB Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while MLFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to MLFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check MLFB's competition here
UMGNF vs VNUE Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 116.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while VNUE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check VNUE's competition here
UMGNF vs SNMN Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while SNMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to SNMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check SNMN's competition here
UMGNF vs BOTYD Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BOTYD has a market cap of 87.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while BOTYD trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas BOTYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BOTYD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is less volatile compared to BOTYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check BOTYD's competition here
UMGNF vs SVSN Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, SVSN has a market cap of 64.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while SVSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas SVSN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SVSN's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to SVSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check SVSN's competition here
UMGNF vs HOMU Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, HOMU has a market cap of 62.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while HOMU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas HOMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to HOMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to HOMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check HOMU's competition here
UMGNF vs GBHL Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while GBHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to GBHL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to GBHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check GBHL's competition here
UMGNF vs AMRU Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 47.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while AMRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to AMRU's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to AMRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check AMRU's competition here
UMGNF vs BLIBQ Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 42.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while BLIBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to BLIBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check BLIBQ's competition here
UMGNF vs BRSE Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BRSE has a market cap of 33.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while BRSE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas BRSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to BRSE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to BRSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check BRSE's competition here
UMGNF vs XSPT Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while XSPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to XSPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check XSPT's competition here
UMGNF vs SONG Comparison February 2026
UMGNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMGNF stands at 42.7B. In comparison, SONG has a market cap of 24.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UMGNF is priced at $22.93, while SONG trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.95, whereas SONG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMGNF's ROE is +0.55%, compared to SONG's ROE of +4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UMGNF is more volatile compared to SONG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMGNF.Check SONG's competition here