Toei Animation Co.,Ltd.
Toei Animation Co.,Ltd. (TOEAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TOEAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOEAF | $17.86 | +0.00% | 3.6B | 23.49 | $0.76 | +1.44% |
| UMGNF | $23.28 | +0.42% | 42.7B | 23.75 | $0.98 | +2.56% |
| UNVGY | $11.59 | +0.70% | 42.4B | 23.57 | $0.49 | +2.60% |
| FWONB | $82.00 | +0.00% | 20.5B | 35.81 | $2.29 | N/A |
| BOIVF | $6.18 | +0.03% | 17.3B | 44.17 | $0.14 | +1.49% |
| NWSAL | $26.80 | +0.00% | 17.1B | 43.23 | $0.62 | +0.75% |
| VIVEF | $10.49 | +2.64% | 10.6B | 22.80 | $0.46 | +0.45% |
| CEVMY | $16.01 | +0.00% | 6.1B | 18.19 | $0.88 | +2.94% |
| CEVMF | $61.00 | +0.00% | 5.9B | 17.38 | $3.51 | +3.09% |
| CYFWY | $16.16 | +0.00% | 5.6B | 9.62 | $1.68 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TOEAF vs UMGNF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UMGNF has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while UMGNF trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas UMGNF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UMGNF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to UMGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check UMGNF's competition here
TOEAF vs UNVGY Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while UNVGY trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check UNVGY's competition here
TOEAF vs FWONB Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while FWONB trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is 35.81. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FWONB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to FWONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check FWONB's competition here
TOEAF vs BOIVF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while BOIVF trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 44.17. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check BOIVF's competition here
TOEAF vs NWSAL Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check NWSAL's competition here
TOEAF vs VIVEF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to VIVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check VIVEF's competition here
TOEAF vs CEVMY Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CEVMY trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CEVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CEVMY's competition here
TOEAF vs CEVMF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CEVMF trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CEVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CEVMF's competition here
TOEAF vs CYFWY Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYFWY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CYFWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CYFWY's competition here
TOEAF vs MCOIF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while MCOIF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCOIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to MCOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check MCOIF's competition here
TOEAF vs MCHOY Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while MCHOY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCHOY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to MCHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check MCHOY's competition here
TOEAF vs VIVHY Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while VIVHY trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is 121.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check VIVHY's competition here
TOEAF vs NANHF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while NANHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to NANHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check NANHF's competition here
TOEAF vs MHSDF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while MHSDF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to MHSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check MHSDF's competition here
TOEAF vs TKCOF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TKCOF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while TKCOF trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas TKCOF's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TKCOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to TKCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check TKCOF's competition here
TOEAF vs CYFWF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYFWF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CYFWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CYFWF's competition here
TOEAF vs AIOSF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while AIOSF trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to AIOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check AIOSF's competition here
TOEAF vs ATVDY Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while ATVDY trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to ATVDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check ATVDY's competition here
TOEAF vs NNMTF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while NNMTF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to NNMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check NNMTF's competition here
TOEAF vs JVTSF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while JVTSF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to JVTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check JVTSF's competition here
TOEAF vs TCLRY Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to TCLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check TCLRY's competition here
TOEAF vs NENTF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 754.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while NENTF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check NENTF's competition here
TOEAF vs CIEZF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 671.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CIEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CIEZF's competition here
TOEAF vs CPXGF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 498.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CPXGF trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -28.04. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CPXGF's competition here
TOEAF vs BORUF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 404M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while BORUF trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BORUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BORUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check BORUF's competition here
TOEAF vs IMXCF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 310.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while IMXCF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to IMXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check IMXCF's competition here
TOEAF vs CLTFF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 226.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CLTFF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CLTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CLTFF's competition here
TOEAF vs NENTY Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 220M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while NENTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to NENTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check NENTY's competition here
TOEAF vs WLDBF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 211.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while WLDBF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check WLDBF's competition here
TOEAF vs CLQDF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLQDF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CLQDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CLQDF's competition here
TOEAF vs AFCJF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 192.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while AFCJF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check AFCJF's competition here
TOEAF vs STEAF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while STEAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to STEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check STEAF's competition here
TOEAF vs ANGMF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ANGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check ANGMF's competition here
TOEAF vs APTTF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while APTTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APTTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to APTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check APTTF's competition here
TOEAF vs ICABY Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while ICABY trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check ICABY's competition here
TOEAF vs THBRF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while THBRF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check THBRF's competition here
TOEAF vs GULDF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while GULDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GULDF's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check GULDF's competition here
TOEAF vs GMSQF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check GMSQF's competition here
TOEAF vs ZUMRF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ZUMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check ZUMRF's competition here
TOEAF vs LGMH Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while LGMH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LGMH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check LGMH's competition here
TOEAF vs OAMCF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while OAMCF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OAMCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check OAMCF's competition here
TOEAF vs ASGRF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ASGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check ASGRF's competition here
TOEAF vs ICABF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ICABF has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while ICABF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas ICABF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICABF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to ICABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check ICABF's competition here
TOEAF vs QYOUF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while QYOUF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QYOUF's ROE of +42.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to QYOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check QYOUF's competition here
TOEAF vs APHP Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while APHP trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -9.17. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APHP's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to APHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check APHP's competition here
TOEAF vs CNWGQ Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CNWGQ's competition here
TOEAF vs XOEEF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XOEEF's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check XOEEF's competition here
TOEAF vs BBOP Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while BBOP trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to BBOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check BBOP's competition here
TOEAF vs HHSE Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while HHSE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check HHSE's competition here
TOEAF vs HWAL Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while HWAL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HWAL's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check HWAL's competition here
TOEAF vs CNNWQ Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CNNWQ's competition here
TOEAF vs AMRU Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while AMRU trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMRU's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to AMRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check AMRU's competition here
TOEAF vs TRMNF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while TRMNF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to TRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check TRMNF's competition here
TOEAF vs BLIBQ Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BLIBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check BLIBQ's competition here
TOEAF vs HDUP Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while HDUP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to HDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check HDUP's competition here
TOEAF vs ABQQD Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ABQQD has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while ABQQD trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas ABQQD's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABQQD's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to ABQQD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check ABQQD's competition here
TOEAF vs AERA Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AERA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while AERA trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas AERA's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AERA's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to AERA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check AERA's competition here
TOEAF vs MVNC Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while MVNC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MVNC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check MVNC's competition here
TOEAF vs LTES Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while LTES trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check LTES's competition here
TOEAF vs CAPV Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CAPV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CAPV's competition here
TOEAF vs ITVI Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while ITVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ITVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check ITVI's competition here
TOEAF vs HOFV Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while HOFV trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check HOFV's competition here
TOEAF vs STGZ Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while STGZ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STGZ's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check STGZ's competition here
TOEAF vs BLIAQ Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while BLIAQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BLIAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check BLIAQ's competition here
TOEAF vs ENTEF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while ENTEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ENTEF's ROE of +4.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ENTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check ENTEF's competition here
TOEAF vs BSEG Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while BSEG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BSEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check BSEG's competition here
TOEAF vs UMGP Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while UMGP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to UMGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check UMGP's competition here
TOEAF vs AMFL Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while AMFL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check AMFL's competition here
TOEAF vs IMTV Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while IMTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to IMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check IMTV's competition here
TOEAF vs VYRE Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VYRE has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while VYRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas VYRE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VYRE's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to VYRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check VYRE's competition here
TOEAF vs EVLI Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EVLI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while EVLI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas EVLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVLI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to EVLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check EVLI's competition here
TOEAF vs AFOM Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AFOM has a market cap of 925.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while AFOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas AFOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFOM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to AFOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check AFOM's competition here
TOEAF vs EEGI Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 852.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while EEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check EEGI's competition here
TOEAF vs HQGE Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 774K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while HQGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HQGE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to HQGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check HQGE's competition here
TOEAF vs NETWF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 741.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while NETWF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to NETWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check NETWF's competition here
TOEAF vs RLTR Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 677.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while RLTR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to RLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check RLTR's competition here
TOEAF vs WRIT Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 503.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while WRIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to WRIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check WRIT's competition here
TOEAF vs TAMG Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while TAMG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to TAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check TAMG's competition here
TOEAF vs RWMI Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 462.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while RWMI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RWMI's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to RWMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check RWMI's competition here
TOEAF vs SEGI Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 391.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while SEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to SEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check SEGI's competition here
TOEAF vs WEBB Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while WEBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to WEBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check WEBB's competition here
TOEAF vs CEXE Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEXE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CEXE's competition here
TOEAF vs RIVU Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while RIVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to RIVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check RIVU's competition here
TOEAF vs PLFX Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 239.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while PLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to PLFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check PLFX's competition here
TOEAF vs MIKP Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while MIKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to MIKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check MIKP's competition here
TOEAF vs MMVVF Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MMVVF has a market cap of 188.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while MMVVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas MMVVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MMVVF's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to MMVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check MMVVF's competition here
TOEAF vs DTTVY Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 184.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while DTTVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to DTTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check DTTVY's competition here
TOEAF vs BOTY Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 168.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while BOTY trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check BOTY's competition here
TOEAF vs MLFB Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while MLFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to MLFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check MLFB's competition here
TOEAF vs SNMN Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while SNMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to SNMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check SNMN's competition here
TOEAF vs VGTL Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 102.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while VGTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check VGTL's competition here
TOEAF vs SETY Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SETY has a market cap of 100.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while SETY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas SETY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SETY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to SETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check SETY's competition here
TOEAF vs BOTYD Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BOTYD has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while BOTYD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas BOTYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOTYD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BOTYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check BOTYD's competition here
TOEAF vs CCLX Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while CCLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check CCLX's competition here
TOEAF vs URBT Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while URBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to URBT's ROE of +67.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to URBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check URBT's competition here
TOEAF vs GBHL Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while GBHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBHL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to GBHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check GBHL's competition here
TOEAF vs BRSE Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BRSE has a market cap of 50.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while BRSE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas BRSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRSE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BRSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check BRSE's competition here
TOEAF vs VNUE Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 47.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while VNUE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check VNUE's competition here
TOEAF vs XSPT Comparison May 2026
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $17.86, while XSPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to XSPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.Check XSPT's competition here