Umami Sustainable Seafood Inc.
Umami Sustainable Seafood Inc. UMAM Peers
See (UMAM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMAM | $0.00 | +0.00% | 5056.00 | N/A | -$0.19 | N/A |
| IDDWF | $28.48 | -3.39% | 10.38B | 36.51 | $0.78 | +1.05% |
| REECF | $14.00 | -12.50% | 9.04B | 37.84 | $0.37 | +1.04% |
| ADRZY | $14.09 | -0.04% | 6.90B | 13.04 | $1.08 | +3.89% |
| ADRZF | $69.15 | N/A | 6.75B | 12.76 | $5.42 | +3.61% |
| TMTNF | $80.15 | N/A | 6.51B | 18.60 | $4.31 | +1.76% |
| FINGF | $36.53 | -0.79% | 4.92B | 14.38 | $2.54 | +2.17% |
| EENEF | $7.53 | -7.72% | 3.57B | 15.69 | $0.48 | +3.73% |
| GROUF | $11.00 | N/A | 2.15B | 11.70 | $0.94 | +5.94% |
| RUSMF | $28.89 | N/A | 1.65B | 15.21 | $1.90 | +4.19% |
Stock Comparison
UMAM vs IDDWF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, IDDWF has a market cap of 10.38B. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while IDDWF trades at $28.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDDWF's P/E ratio is 36.51. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to IDDWF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to IDDWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs REECF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, REECF has a market cap of 9.04B. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while REECF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REECF's P/E ratio is 37.84. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to REECF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to REECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs ADRZY Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, ADRZY has a market cap of 6.90B. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while ADRZY trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADRZY's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ADRZY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to ADRZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs ADRZF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, ADRZF has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while ADRZF trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADRZF's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ADRZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to ADRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs TMTNF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, TMTNF has a market cap of 6.51B. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while TMTNF trades at $80.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMTNF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to TMTNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to TMTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs FINGF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, FINGF has a market cap of 4.92B. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while FINGF trades at $36.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINGF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FINGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to FINGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs EENEF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, EENEF has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while EENEF trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EENEF's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to EENEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to EENEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs GROUF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, GROUF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while GROUF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROUF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GROUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and GROUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMAM vs RUSMF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, RUSMF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while RUSMF trades at $28.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUSMF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to RUSMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to RUSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs HDIUF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, HDIUF has a market cap of 469.25M. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while HDIUF trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDIUF's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HDIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and HDIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMAM vs WJXFF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, WJXFF has a market cap of 371.38M. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while WJXFF trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WJXFF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to WJXFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and WJXFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMAM vs PRKCF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, PRKCF has a market cap of 112.15M. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while PRKCF trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRKCF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PRKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and PRKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMAM vs KHDHF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, KHDHF has a market cap of 94.44M. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while KHDHF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHDHF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KHDHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to KHDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs CVTYF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, CVTYF has a market cap of 68.29M. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while CVTYF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVTYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CVTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and CVTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMAM vs HPURF Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, HPURF has a market cap of 55.36M. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while HPURF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPURF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HPURF's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and HPURF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMAM vs EMPS Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, EMPS has a market cap of 3.65M. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while EMPS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to EMPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and EMPS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMAM vs TXHG Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, TXHG has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while TXHG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to TXHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to TXHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs VVWT Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, VVWT has a market cap of 534600.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while VVWT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVWT's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to VVWT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to VVWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs GYOG Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, GYOG has a market cap of 150577.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while GYOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GYOG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GYOG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and GYOG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMAM vs WARM Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, WARM has a market cap of 86237.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while WARM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WARM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to WARM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and WARM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMAM vs PHOT Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, PHOT has a market cap of 11077.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while PHOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PHOT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to PHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs CDIIQ Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, CDIIQ has a market cap of 9190.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while CDIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CDIIQ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to CDIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs MJHI Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, MJHI has a market cap of 9107.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while MJHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MJHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and MJHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMAM vs ORGH Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, ORGH has a market cap of 4917.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while ORGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ORGH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to ORGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs VALV Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, VALV has a market cap of 1720.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while VALV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to VALV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and VALV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMAM vs SLUP Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, SLUP has a market cap of 548.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while SLUP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SLUP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to SLUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs PUDA Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, PUDA has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while PUDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PUDA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM is less volatile compared to PUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMAM.
UMAM vs CGDI Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, CGDI has a market cap of 66.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while CGDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGDI's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CGDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and CGDI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMAM vs HESV Comparison
UMAM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMAM stands at 5056.00. In comparison, HESV has a market cap of 17.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMAM is priced at $0.00, while HESV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMAM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HESV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UMAM's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HESV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMAM and HESV have similar daily volatility (0.00).