Indutrade AB (publ)

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TMTNF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while TMTNF trades at $156.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas TMTNF's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TMTNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to TMTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check TMTNF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FINGF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while FINGF trades at $70.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas FINGF's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FINGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to FINGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check FINGF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ADRZF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while ADRZF trades at $79.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas ADRZF's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADRZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to ADRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check ADRZF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ADRZY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while ADRZY trades at $15.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas ADRZY's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADRZY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to ADRZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check ADRZY's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, REECF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while REECF trades at $7.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas REECF's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REECF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to REECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check REECF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, EENEF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while EENEF trades at $9.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas EENEF's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EENEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to EENEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check EENEF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GROUF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while GROUF trades at $12.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas GROUF's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GROUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to GROUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check GROUF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RUSMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while RUSMF trades at $37.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas RUSMF's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RUSMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to RUSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check RUSMF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HDIUF has a market cap of 589.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while HDIUF trades at $24.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas HDIUF's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HDIUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to HDIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check HDIUF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WJXFF has a market cap of 505.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while WJXFF trades at $23.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas WJXFF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WJXFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to WJXFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check WJXFF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PRKCF has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while PRKCF trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas PRKCF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to PRKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check PRKCF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, KHDHF has a market cap of 101.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while KHDHF trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas KHDHF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KHDHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to KHDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check KHDHF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CVTYF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while CVTYF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas CVTYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to CVTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check CVTYF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HPURF has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while HPURF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas HPURF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HPURF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to HPURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check HPURF's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, EMPS has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while EMPS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas EMPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to EMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check EMPS's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VVWT has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while VVWT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas VVWT's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VVWT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to VVWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check VVWT's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TXHG has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while TXHG trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas TXHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TXHG's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to TXHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check TXHG's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GYOG has a market cap of 150.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while GYOG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas GYOG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GYOG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to GYOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check GYOG's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CDIIQ has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while CDIIQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas CDIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CDIIQ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to CDIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check CDIIQ's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, MJHI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while MJHI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas MJHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MJHI's ROE of -88.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to MJHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check MJHI's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WARM has a market cap of 8.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while WARM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas WARM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WARM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to WARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check WARM's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PHOT has a market cap of 5.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while PHOT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas PHOT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PHOT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to PHOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check PHOT's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, UMAM has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while UMAM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas UMAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UMAM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to UMAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check UMAM's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ORGH has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while ORGH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas ORGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORGH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to ORGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check ORGH's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PUDA has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while PUDA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas PUDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PUDA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to PUDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check PUDA's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VALV has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while VALV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas VALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VALV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to VALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check VALV's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SLUP has a market cap of 548. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while SLUP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas SLUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLUP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to SLUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check SLUP's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CGDI has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while CGDI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas CGDI's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to CGDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check CGDI's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HESV has a market cap of 17. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while HESV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas HESV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HESV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to HESV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check HESV's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ZAHA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while ZAHA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas ZAHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZAHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to ZAHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check ZAHA's competition here

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WPMLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while WPMLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.35, whereas WPMLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WPMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to WPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.Check WPMLF's competition here