Universal Mfg. Co.
Universal Mfg. Co. UFMG Peers
See (UFMG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFMG | $0.00 | +0.00% | 4.49M | N/A | -$12.58 | N/A |
| FYGGY | $1.50 | N/A | 48.07B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +1.00% |
| DNZOY | $13.26 | +0.06% | 37.35B | 13.39 | $0.99 | +0.94% |
| DNZOF | $12.31 | -10.64% | 34.68B | 12.56 | $0.98 | +3.53% |
| BRDCF | $42.50 | N/A | 28.81B | 15.68 | $2.71 | +3.10% |
| BRDCY | $21.03 | -0.68% | 28.50B | 15.35 | $1.37 | +2.10% |
| MGDDY | $19.57 | +0.98% | 27.62B | 8.76 | $2.23 | +3.71% |
| MGDDF | $38.66 | N/A | 27.28B | 3.46 | $11.17 | +3.79% |
| CTTAF | $85.64 | +0.99% | 17.13B | 13.11 | $6.53 | +2.86% |
| CTTAY | $8.47 | +1.93% | 16.94B | 13.03 | $0.65 | +2.63% |
Stock Comparison
UFMG vs FYGGY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.07B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and FYGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs DNZOY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.35B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while DNZOY trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs DNZOF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 34.68B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while DNZOF trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs BRDCF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 28.81B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while BRDCF trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs BRDCY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 28.50B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while BRDCY trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs MGDDY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 27.62B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while MGDDY trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs MGDDF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 27.28B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while MGDDF trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs CTTAF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 17.13B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while CTTAF trades at $85.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs CTTAY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 16.94B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while CTTAY trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs KNRRY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16.00B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while KNRRY trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 33.54. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs KNBHF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.41B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while KNBHF trades at $95.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs SMTOY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 14.04B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while SMTOY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs PTAIY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 12.21B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while PTAIY trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs PTAIF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.38B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs HLLGY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.56B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while HLLGY trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs HLKHF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.28B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs ASEKY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while ASEKY trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs ASEKF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and ASEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs NGKSY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.83B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NGKSY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and NGKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs PLLIF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while PLLIF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs NGKSF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs SFFLY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while SFFLY trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs YORUF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and YORUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs FESTF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while FESTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs YORUY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while YORUY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs BRBOY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs KOTMY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while KOTMY trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and KOTMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs SCFLF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs KOTMF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and KOTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs BRBOF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while BRBOF trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and BRBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs MNTHY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while MNTHY trades at $51.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs STAEY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while STAEY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs SMTUF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and SMTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs LIMAF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while LIMAF trades at $44.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs STAEF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while STAEF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and STAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs VLEEY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while VLEEY trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs TDBOF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and TDBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs VLEEF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while VLEEF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs NHKGF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs VTSCF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and VTSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs MNTHF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs NPSKY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NPSKY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and NPSKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs NPSKF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs TGOSY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs ARBFF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs JELCF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while JELCF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs JEHLY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and JEHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs MBUMY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while MBUMY trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs MBUMF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs GMPUF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and GMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs UNIEF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs NTXVF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NTXVF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs GUDDY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs FURCF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while FURCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs PASTF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while PASTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs NIFCY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and NIFCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs NKRKY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 973.38M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NKRKY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -25.21. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs NKRKF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.90M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -23.98. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs TIANF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.52M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs GUDHF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 867.36M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs SFHLF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 847.97M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while SFHLF trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs ATNNF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.56M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs ABDDF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.50M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and ABDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs FAURY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 709.61M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while FAURY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and FAURY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs FCVFF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.71M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and FCVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs NMAKF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 493.41M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NMAKF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and NMAKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs MRETF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 430.90M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while MRETF trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs TCISF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 419.96M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and TCISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs SAEOF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.22M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and SAEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs VTSCY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.21M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and VTSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs PWRHF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.08M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs ELLRY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 361.15M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while ELLRY trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs EGKLF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.70M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs NPSGF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.64M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs NPSGY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 265.78M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs XNGIF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.67M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs IOCJY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 224.68M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while IOCJY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs WLMTF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 197.89M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while WLMTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and WLMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs EXCOF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 182.54M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while EXCOF trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs AKBIF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 181.28M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while AKBIF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs AMGRF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.61M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs HWAFF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158.02M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and HWAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs KGAUF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 148.71M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs SCTH Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.47M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while SCTH trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and SCTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs CAOHF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.12M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and CAOHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs LEAT Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 49.86M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while LEAT trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -22.91. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs STSGF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.71M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and STSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs NWFAF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.88M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and NWFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs VOAXF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27.00M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and VOAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs CREVF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.34M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and CREVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs CCEGF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.56M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs CMMCF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.17M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs ATHHF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 4.74M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while ATHHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs AFFL Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.47M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while AFFL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and AFFL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs OPTI Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 3.76M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.
UFMG vs NFGRF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 2.82M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and NFGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs AMTY Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 2.80M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and AMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs SPKTF Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG and SPKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UFMG vs CDTI Comparison
UFMG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFMG stands at 4.49M. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.61M. Regarding current trading prices, UFMG is priced at $0.00, while CDTI trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, UFMG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFMG is less volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFMG.