Lesaka Technologies, Inc.
Lesaka Technologies, Inc. UEPS Peers
See (UEPS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UEPS | $4.74 | -1.46% | 287.1M | -12.00 | -$0.40 | N/A |
| MSFT | $450.18 | -1.03% | 3.3T | 34.84 | $12.92 | +0.72% |
| ORCL | $155.97 | -0.85% | 437.4B | 36.61 | $4.26 | +1.09% |
| PLTR | $123.31 | +0.83% | 291B | 536.13 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $407.69 | -1.60% | 173.8B | 26.95 | $15.13 | N/A |
| PANW | $186.74 | +0.32% | 124.5B | 107.32 | $1.74 | N/A |
| CRWD | $455.59 | +2.59% | 113.5B | -5062.11 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| FTNT | $103.16 | -0.44% | 79B | 42.45 | $2.43 | N/A |
| SNPS | $498.85 | -0.92% | 77.1B | 59.89 | $8.33 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UEPS vs MSFT Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while MSFT trades at $450.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 34.84. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs ORCL Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 437.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while ORCL trades at $155.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs PLTR Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 291B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while PLTR trades at $123.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 536.13. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs ADBE Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 173.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while ADBE trades at $407.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs PANW Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 124.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while PANW trades at $186.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 107.32. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs CRWD Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 113.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while CRWD trades at $455.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -5062.11. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs FTNT Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while FTNT trades at $103.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 42.45. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs SNPS Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while SNPS trades at $498.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 59.89. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs VMW Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs HOOD Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while HOOD trades at $63.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs NET Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while NET trades at $158.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -658.50. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs SQ Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs CRWV Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while CRWV trades at $102.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -40.45. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs ZS Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while ZS trades at $254.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -2541.00. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs XYZ Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while XYZ trades at $58.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs NETE Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs SPLK Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs VRSN Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while VRSN trades at $279.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs GDDY Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while GDDY trades at $182.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs IOT Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while IOT trades at $45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -162.50. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs CHKP Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while CHKP trades at $227.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs TOST Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while TOST trades at $42.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 157.37. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs CPAY Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while CPAY trades at $324.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs FLT Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs NTNX Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while NTNX trades at $79.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -306.77. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs OKTA Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while OKTA trades at $123.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 2062.00. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs CYBR Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while CYBR trades at $381.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -188.76. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs RBRK Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while RBRK trades at $92.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs GEN Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while GEN trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs FFIV Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while FFIV trades at $282.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs AFRM Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while AFRM trades at $49.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -259.45. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs KSPI Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while KSPI trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs MDB Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while MDB trades at $185.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -107.43. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs NLOK Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs AKAM Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while AKAM trades at $75.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs DOX Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while DOX trades at $91.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs ALTR Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs PLAN Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs SAIL Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while SAIL trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs KVYO Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while KVYO trades at $33.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -197.00. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs WIX Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while WIX trades at $151.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 59.79. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs DBX Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while DBX trades at $28.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs INFA Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while INFA trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 751.67. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs CFLT Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while CFLT trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -22.52. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs HCP Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs JCOM Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs PATH Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while PATH trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -95.15. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs SQSP Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs S Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while S trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas S's P/E ratio is -21.48. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to S's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs NEWR Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs FOUR Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while FOUR trades at $89.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs CCCS Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while CCCS trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 847.00. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs SPSC Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while SPSC trades at $142.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 66.77. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs VRNS Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while VRNS trades at $46.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -57.80. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs QLYS Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while QLYS trades at $134.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs ACIW Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while ACIW trades at $46.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs NVEI Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs WEX Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while WEX trades at $133.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs RELY Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while RELY trades at $22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -744.33. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs EEFT Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while EEFT trades at $105.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs BOX Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while BOX trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs CLBT Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while CLBT trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs TENB Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while TENB trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -83.95. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs ODD Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while ODD trades at $69.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 40.03. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs ESMT Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs AVPT Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while AVPT trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -140.23. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs STNE Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while STNE trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.03. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs DLO Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while DLO trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs SWI Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs CORZ Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while CORZ trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs CORZZ Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while CORZZ trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs EVOP Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs PAGS Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while PAGS trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs DOCN Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while DOCN trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs PAYO Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while PAYO trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs MQ Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while MQ trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 50.70. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs EVTC Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while EVTC trades at $36.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs APPN Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while APPN trades at $30.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs BB Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while BB trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -376.00. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs GETVV Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs TDC Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while TDC trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs FIVN Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while FIVN trades at $26.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -443.17. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs AVDX Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while AVDX trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 243.50. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs RAMP Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while RAMP trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -773.00. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs FORG Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs GSKY Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs CSGS Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while CSGS trades at $63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs EVCM Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while EVCM trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -81.00. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs GET Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs STER Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs NTCT Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while NTCT trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs ZUO Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs CORZW Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while CORZW trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs SUMO Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs GB Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while GB trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs RPD Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while RPD trades at $22.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 56.00. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs AVPTW Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while AVPTW trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs TUYA Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while TUYA trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.
UEPS vs PAYA Comparison
UEPS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UEPS stands at 287.1M. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UEPS is priced at $4.74, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UEPS currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, UEPS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UEPS is more volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UEPS.