UltraTech Cement Limited

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 66.59B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CRH trades at $98.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, HCMLY has a market cap of 62.54B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while HCMLY trades at $22.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas HCMLY's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCMLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to HCMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, HCMLF has a market cap of 59.45B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while HCMLF trades at $107.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas HCMLF's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to HCMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CRHCF has a market cap of 38.08B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CRHCF trades at $53.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CRHCF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRHCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CRHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 35.70B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while VMC trades at $270.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, HLBZF has a market cap of 35.61B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while HLBZF trades at $203.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas HLBZF's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to HLBZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 32.69B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while MLM trades at $542.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, GRSXY has a market cap of 21.83B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while GRSXY trades at $19.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas GRSXY's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRSXY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and GRSXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, BHBSY has a market cap of 18.00B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BHBSY trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BHBSY's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHBSY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and BHBSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, AHCHF has a market cap of 17.36B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while AHCHF trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas AHCHF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHCHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to AHCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, AHCHY has a market cap of 16.15B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while AHCHY trades at $13.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas AHCHY's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHCHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to AHCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, IMYSY has a market cap of 14.08B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while IMYSY trades at $5.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas IMYSY's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMYSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and IMYSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, JHIUF has a market cap of 12.46B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while JHIUF trades at $29.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas JHIUF's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JHIUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to JHIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 10.28B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while JHX trades at $23.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, BZZUY has a market cap of 9.68B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BZZUY trades at $26.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BZZUY's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BZZUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BZZUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.23B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while SUM trades at $52.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CXMSF has a market cap of 9.07B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CXMSF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CXMSF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CXMSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CXMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, BZZUF has a market cap of 9.05B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BZZUF trades at $50.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BZZUF's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BZZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BZZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 8.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CX trades at $6.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 7.83B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while EXP trades at $235.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, TGBMF has a market cap of 7.45B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while TGBMF trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas TGBMF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGBMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and TGBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 5.50B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while KNF trades at $97.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, ADLDY has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while ADLDY trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas ADLDY's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADLDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to ADLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, HDELY has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while HDELY trades at $25.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas HDELY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDELY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to HDELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CBUMF has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CBUMF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CBUMF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBUMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CBUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, XYIGY has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while XYIGY trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas XYIGY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XYIGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and XYIGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, WBRBY has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while WBRBY trades at $7.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas WBRBY's P/E ratio is 45.72. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WBRBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to WBRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, XYIGF has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while XYIGF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas XYIGF's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XYIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to XYIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, BOALF has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BOALF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BOALF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOALF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BOALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, BOALY has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BOALY trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BOALY's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOALY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and BOALY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, BBMPY has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BBMPY trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BBMPY's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBMPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BBMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BCC trades at $92.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while TGLS trades at $74.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, WBRBF has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while WBRBF trades at $31.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas WBRBF's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WBRBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and WBRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, THYCY has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while THYCY trades at $6.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas THYCY's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THYCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and THYCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, GCWOF has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while GCWOF trades at $8.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas GCWOF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GCWOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to GCWOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while USLM trades at $99.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, THYCF has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while THYCF trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas THYCF's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to THYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, IMYSF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while IMYSF trades at $33.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas IMYSF's P/E ratio is -26.12. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMYSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to IMYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CMZOF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CMZOF trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CMZOF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMZOF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CMZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while TTAM trades at $12.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, BRKWF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BRKWF trades at $15.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BRKWF's P/E ratio is -73.88. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRKWF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BRKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, FCREY has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while FCREY trades at $3.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas FCREY's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCREY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to FCREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, FRCEF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while FRCEF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas FRCEF's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRCEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to FRCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, HCPHY has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while HCPHY trades at $14.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas HCPHY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCPHY's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and HCPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, SDCVF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while SDCVF trades at $38.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas SDCVF's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to SDCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CARCY has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CARCY trades at $6.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CARCY's P/E ratio is 50.90. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CARCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CARCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, PITPF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PITPF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PITPF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PITPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to PITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CJRCF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CJRCF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CJRCF's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CJRCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CJRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, ADBCF has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while ADBCF trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas ADBCF's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADBCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and ADBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CCGLF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CCGLF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CCGLF's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CCGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, PSGTY has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PSGTY trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PSGTY's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSGTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and PSGTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, PITPY has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PITPY trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PITPY's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PITPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to PITPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, WCHNF has a market cap of 983.26M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while WCHNF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas WCHNF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WCHNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to WCHNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, PTHIF has a market cap of 894.72M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PTHIF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PTHIF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTHIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and PTHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, SUCEF has a market cap of 858.83M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while SUCEF trades at $26.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas SUCEF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUCEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to SUCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, IBJHF has a market cap of 811.71M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while IBJHF trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas IBJHF's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IBJHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to IBJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, PSGTF has a market cap of 810.18M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PSGTF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PSGTF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to PSGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, MCEM has a market cap of 629.61M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while MCEM trades at $247.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas MCEM's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCEM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to MCEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CMTOY has a market cap of 624.80M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CMTOY trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CMTOY's P/E ratio is 400.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMTOY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CMTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, FTTRF has a market cap of 560.23M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while FTTRF trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas FTTRF's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTTRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and FTTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CGCLF has a market cap of 517.98M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CGCLF trades at $20.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CGCLF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGCLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CGCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CWXZF has a market cap of 446.61M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CWXZF trades at $5.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CWXZF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWXZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CWXZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, PPCLY has a market cap of 352.05M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PPCLY trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PPCLY's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPCLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and PPCLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, TGAFF has a market cap of 297.93M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while TGAFF trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas TGAFF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGAFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and TGAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 257.17M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while LOMA trades at $11.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CHYMF has a market cap of 217.08M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CHYMF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CHYMF's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHYMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CHYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 162.64M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while SMID trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, BSND has a market cap of 114.75M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BSND trades at $850.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BSND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BSND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 93.25M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CPAC trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 87.28M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while FEAM trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -9.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, BURCP has a market cap of 75.75M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BURCP trades at $53.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BURCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BURCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and BURCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CBUMY has a market cap of 75.18M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CBUMY trades at $25.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CBUMY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBUMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, SPPCF has a market cap of 67.89M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while SPPCF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas SPPCF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPPCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and SPPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, ZHIXF has a market cap of 57.67M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while ZHIXF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas ZHIXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZHIXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and ZHIXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, LKSGF has a market cap of 45.22M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while LKSGF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas LKSGF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LKSGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to LKSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, RTGOF has a market cap of 38.52M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while RTGOF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas RTGOF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RTGOF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and RTGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, STAI has a market cap of 34.21M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while STAI trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas STAI's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to STAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CTXXF has a market cap of 26.63M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CTXXF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CTXXF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTXXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, PTHIY has a market cap of 21.39M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PTHIY trades at $5.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PTHIY's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTHIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and PTHIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, ACPS has a market cap of 16.75M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while ACPS trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas ACPS's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACPS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and ACPS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CAPT has a market cap of 15.96M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CAPT trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CAPT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAPT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CAPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 9.75M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while RETO trades at $3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, BASA has a market cap of 9.09M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BASA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BASA's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BASA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, PNLT has a market cap of 8723.00. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PNLT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PNLT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNLT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and PNLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, SNLP has a market cap of 3451.00. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while SNLP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas SNLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNLP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and SNLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, CHGS has a market cap of 2680.00. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CHGS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CHGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHGS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CHGS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, WWST has a market cap of 33.00. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while WWST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas WWST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WWST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and WWST have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, AQCP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while AQCP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas AQCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AQCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and AQCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, TJSS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while TJSS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas TJSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TJSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to TJSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, USCR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while USCR trades at $73.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.

UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.30B. In comparison, LXRRF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while LXRRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas LXRRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LXRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and LXRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).