UltraTech Cement Limited
UltraTech Cement Limited UCLQF Peers
See (UCLQF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCLQF | $103.00 | +0.00% | 30.3B | 35.15 | $2.93 | +0.81% |
| HCMLY | $24.33 | -1.06% | 67.5B | 18.84 | $1.30 | +2.81% |
| HLBZF | $237.34 | +3.04% | 41.5B | 21.31 | $11.14 | +1.56% |
| HCMLF | $74.28 | +2.91% | 40B | 11.57 | $6.42 | +5.00% |
| CRHCF | $53.56 | -0.81% | 38.1B | 13.91 | $3.85 | +1.58% |
| GRSXY | $19.61 | +0.00% | 22.8B | 15.20 | $1.29 | +1.28% |
| AHCHF | $2.89 | +0.00% | 18.3B | 13.76 | $0.21 | +3.39% |
| AHCHY | $12.70 | -0.33% | 16.2B | 12.02 | $1.06 | +3.70% |
| IMYSY | $5.74 | +0.00% | 14.1B | -22.96 | -$0.25 | +5.70% |
| JHIUF | $24.69 | +0.00% | 10.6B | 25.19 | $0.98 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UCLQF vs HCMLY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, HCMLY has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while HCMLY trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas HCMLY's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCMLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to HCMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs HLBZF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, HLBZF has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while HLBZF trades at $237.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas HLBZF's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to HLBZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs HCMLF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, HCMLF has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while HCMLF trades at $74.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas HCMLF's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and HCMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs CRHCF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CRHCF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CRHCF trades at $53.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CRHCF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRHCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CRHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs GRSXY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, GRSXY has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while GRSXY trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas GRSXY's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRSXY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and GRSXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs AHCHF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, AHCHF has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while AHCHF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas AHCHF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHCHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to AHCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs AHCHY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, AHCHY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while AHCHY trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas AHCHY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHCHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to AHCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs IMYSY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, IMYSY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while IMYSY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas IMYSY's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMYSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and IMYSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs JHIUF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, JHIUF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while JHIUF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas JHIUF's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JHIUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to JHIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs CXMSF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CXMSF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CXMSF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CXMSF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CXMSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CXMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs BZZUY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, BZZUY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BZZUY trades at $27.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BZZUY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BZZUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BZZUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs BZZUF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, BZZUF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BZZUF trades at $52.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BZZUF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BZZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BZZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs TGBMF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, TGBMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while TGBMF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas TGBMF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGBMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and TGBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs ADLDY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, ADLDY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while ADLDY trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas ADLDY's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADLDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to ADLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs HDELY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, HDELY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while HDELY trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas HDELY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDELY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to HDELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs XYIGF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, XYIGF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while XYIGF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas XYIGF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XYIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to XYIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs CBUMF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CBUMF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CBUMF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CBUMF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBUMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs WBRBY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, WBRBY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while WBRBY trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas WBRBY's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WBRBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to WBRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs FCREY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, FCREY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while FCREY trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas FCREY's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCREY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to FCREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs XYIGY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, XYIGY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while XYIGY trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas XYIGY's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XYIGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and XYIGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs BOALF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, BOALF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BOALF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BOALF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOALF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BOALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs BOALY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, BOALY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BOALY trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BOALY's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOALY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and BOALY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs WBRBF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, WBRBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while WBRBF trades at $31.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas WBRBF's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WBRBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and WBRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs GCWOF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, GCWOF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while GCWOF trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas GCWOF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GCWOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to GCWOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs SDCVF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, SDCVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while SDCVF trades at $63.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas SDCVF's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to SDCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs THYCF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, THYCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while THYCF trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas THYCF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to THYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs IMYSF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, IMYSF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while IMYSF trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas IMYSF's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMYSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to IMYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs THYCY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, THYCY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while THYCY trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas THYCY's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THYCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and THYCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs CMZOF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CMZOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CMZOF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CMZOF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMZOF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CMZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs BRKWF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, BRKWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BRKWF trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BRKWF's P/E ratio is -83.86. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRKWF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BRKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs FRCEF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, FRCEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while FRCEF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas FRCEF's P/E ratio is -14.23. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRCEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to FRCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs HCPHY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, HCPHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while HCPHY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas HCPHY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCPHY's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and HCPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs PITPF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, PITPF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PITPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PITPF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PITPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to PITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs CARCY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CARCY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CARCY trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CARCY's P/E ratio is 46.22. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CARCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CARCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs CJRCF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CJRCF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CJRCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CJRCF's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CJRCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CJRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs ADBCF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, ADBCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while ADBCF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas ADBCF's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and ADBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs CCGLF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CCGLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CCGLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CCGLF's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CCGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs PITPY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, PITPY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PITPY trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PITPY's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PITPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to PITPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs PSGTF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, PSGTF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PSGTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PSGTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSGTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to PSGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs WCHNF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, WCHNF has a market cap of 983.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while WCHNF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas WCHNF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WCHNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to WCHNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs PSGTY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, PSGTY has a market cap of 979M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PSGTY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PSGTY's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSGTY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to PSGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs PTHIF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, PTHIF has a market cap of 894.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PTHIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PTHIF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTHIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and PTHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs SUCEF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, SUCEF has a market cap of 859.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while SUCEF trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas SUCEF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUCEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to SUCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs IBJHF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, IBJHF has a market cap of 813M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while IBJHF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas IBJHF's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IBJHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to IBJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs CMTOY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CMTOY has a market cap of 616.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CMTOY trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CMTOY's P/E ratio is 394.67. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMTOY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CMTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs MCEM Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, MCEM has a market cap of 609.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while MCEM trades at $239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas MCEM's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCEM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to MCEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs CWXZF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CWXZF has a market cap of 564M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CWXZF trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CWXZF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWXZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CWXZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs CGCLF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CGCLF has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CGCLF trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CGCLF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGCLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CGCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs PPCLY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, PPCLY has a market cap of 403.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PPCLY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PPCLY's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPCLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and PPCLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs TGAFF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, TGAFF has a market cap of 395.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while TGAFF trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas TGAFF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGAFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to TGAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs FTTRF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, FTTRF has a market cap of 381.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while FTTRF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas FTTRF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTTRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to FTTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs BHBSY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, BHBSY has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BHBSY trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BHBSY's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHBSY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and BHBSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs CHYMF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CHYMF has a market cap of 289.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CHYMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CHYMF's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHYMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CHYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs BBMPY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, BBMPY has a market cap of 177.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BBMPY trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BBMPY's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBMPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BBMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs BSND Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, BSND has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BSND trades at $850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BSND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and BSND have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs BURCP Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, BURCP has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BURCP trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BURCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BURCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and BURCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs CBUMY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CBUMY has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CBUMY trades at $23.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CBUMY's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBUMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs SPPCF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, SPPCF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while SPPCF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas SPPCF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPPCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and SPPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs ZHIXF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, ZHIXF has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while ZHIXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas ZHIXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZHIXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and ZHIXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs RTGOF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, RTGOF has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while RTGOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas RTGOF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RTGOF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and RTGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs CTXXF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CTXXF has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CTXXF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CTXXF's P/E ratio is -22.40. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTXXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to CTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs PTHIY Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, PTHIY has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PTHIY trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PTHIY's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTHIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and PTHIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs BASA Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, BASA has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while BASA trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas BASA's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BASA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to BASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs ACPS Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, ACPS has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while ACPS trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas ACPS's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACPS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to ACPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs LKSGF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, LKSGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while LKSGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas LKSGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LKSGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to LKSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs PNLT Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, PNLT has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while PNLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas PNLT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNLT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and PNLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs SNLP Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, SNLP has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while SNLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas SNLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNLP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and SNLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs CHGS Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, CHGS has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while CHGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas CHGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHGS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and CHGS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs WWST Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, WWST has a market cap of 33. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while WWST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas WWST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WWST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and WWST have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs LXRRF Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, LXRRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while LXRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas LXRRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LXRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and LXRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UCLQF vs TJSS Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, TJSS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while TJSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas TJSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TJSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF is less volatile compared to TJSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCLQF.
UCLQF vs AQCP Comparison
UCLQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCLQF stands at 30.3B. In comparison, AQCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UCLQF is priced at $103.00, while AQCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCLQF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.15, whereas AQCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCLQF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AQCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCLQF and AQCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).