HeidelbergCement AG
HeidelbergCement AG (HLBZF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HLBZF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLBZF | $215.24 | -4.01% | 38.4B | 16.70 | $13.07 | +1.69% |
| HCPHY | $14.10 | +0.00% | 91B | 34.39 | $0.41 | N/A |
| PTHIY | $5.93 | +0.00% | 53.5B | 19.77 | $0.30 | +2.13% |
| HCMLY | $18.59 | +0.06% | 51.5B | 103.39 | $0.18 | +61.14% |
| HCMLF | $81.00 | -12.79% | 44.8B | 91.01 | $0.89 | +4.59% |
| CRHCF | $53.56 | -0.81% | 38.1B | 13.91 | $3.85 | +1.27% |
| UCLQF | $103.00 | +0.00% | 29.7B | 35.15 | $2.93 | +0.86% |
| GRSXY | $19.61 | +0.00% | 21.4B | 15.20 | $1.29 | +0.51% |
| CXMSF | $1.20 | +0.00% | 16.8B | -120.00 | -$0.01 | +0.69% |
| AHCHF | $2.73 | +0.00% | 14.5B | 11.38 | $0.24 | +4.86% |
Stock Comparison
HLBZF vs HCPHY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, HCPHY has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while HCPHY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas HCPHY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCPHY's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and HCPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCPHY's competition here
HLBZF vs PTHIY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, PTHIY has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while PTHIY trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas PTHIY's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTHIY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and PTHIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTHIY's competition here
HLBZF vs HCMLY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, HCMLY has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while HCMLY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas HCMLY's P/E ratio is 103.39. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCMLY's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to HCMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check HCMLY's competition here
HLBZF vs HCMLF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, HCMLF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while HCMLF trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas HCMLF's P/E ratio is 91.01. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCMLF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and HCMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCMLF's competition here
HLBZF vs CRHCF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CRHCF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CRHCF trades at $53.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CRHCF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRHCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and CRHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRHCF's competition here
HLBZF vs UCLQF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, UCLQF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while UCLQF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas UCLQF's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UCLQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and UCLQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UCLQF's competition here
HLBZF vs GRSXY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, GRSXY has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while GRSXY trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas GRSXY's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRSXY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and GRSXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRSXY's competition here
HLBZF vs CXMSF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CXMSF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CXMSF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CXMSF's P/E ratio is -120.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CXMSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and CXMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CXMSF's competition here
HLBZF vs AHCHF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, AHCHF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while AHCHF trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas AHCHF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHCHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and AHCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AHCHF's competition here
HLBZF vs AHCHY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, AHCHY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while AHCHY trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas AHCHY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHCHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to AHCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check AHCHY's competition here
HLBZF vs JHIUF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, JHIUF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while JHIUF trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas JHIUF's P/E ratio is 85.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JHIUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and JHIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JHIUF's competition here
HLBZF vs IMYSY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, IMYSY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while IMYSY trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas IMYSY's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMYSY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to IMYSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check IMYSY's competition here
HLBZF vs BZZUY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, BZZUY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while BZZUY trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas BZZUY's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZZUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and BZZUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZZUY's competition here
HLBZF vs BZZUF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, BZZUF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while BZZUF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas BZZUF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZZUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and BZZUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZZUF's competition here
HLBZF vs TGBMF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, TGBMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while TGBMF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas TGBMF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGBMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and TGBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGBMF's competition here
HLBZF vs XYIGF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, XYIGF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while XYIGF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas XYIGF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XYIGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to XYIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check XYIGF's competition here
HLBZF vs XYIGY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, XYIGY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while XYIGY trades at $24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas XYIGY's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XYIGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and XYIGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XYIGY's competition here
HLBZF vs ADLDY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, ADLDY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while ADLDY trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas ADLDY's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADLDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to ADLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check ADLDY's competition here
HLBZF vs CBUMF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CBUMF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CBUMF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CBUMF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBUMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to CBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check CBUMF's competition here
HLBZF vs CBUMY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CBUMY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CBUMY trades at $30.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CBUMY's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBUMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to CBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check CBUMY's competition here
HLBZF vs HDELY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, HDELY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while HDELY trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas HDELY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HDELY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to HDELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check HDELY's competition here
HLBZF vs FCREY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, FCREY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while FCREY trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas FCREY's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCREY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to FCREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check FCREY's competition here
HLBZF vs CMZOF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CMZOF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CMZOF trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CMZOF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMZOF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and CMZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMZOF's competition here
HLBZF vs WBRBF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, WBRBF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while WBRBF trades at $36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas WBRBF's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WBRBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and WBRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WBRBF's competition here
HLBZF vs GCWOF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, GCWOF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while GCWOF trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas GCWOF's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCWOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and GCWOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCWOF's competition here
HLBZF vs BOALF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, BOALF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while BOALF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas BOALF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOALF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to BOALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check BOALF's competition here
HLBZF vs BOALY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, BOALY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while BOALY trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas BOALY's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOALY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and BOALY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOALY's competition here
HLBZF vs SDCVF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, SDCVF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while SDCVF trades at $83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas SDCVF's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SDCVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and SDCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SDCVF's competition here
HLBZF vs WBRBY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, WBRBY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while WBRBY trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas WBRBY's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WBRBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to WBRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check WBRBY's competition here
HLBZF vs THYCY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, THYCY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while THYCY trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas THYCY's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THYCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and THYCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THYCY's competition here
HLBZF vs BRKWF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, BRKWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while BRKWF trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas BRKWF's P/E ratio is -83.86. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRKWF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to BRKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check BRKWF's competition here
HLBZF vs THYCF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, THYCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while THYCF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas THYCF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THYCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and THYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THYCF's competition here
HLBZF vs PITPF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, PITPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while PITPF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas PITPF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PITPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to PITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check PITPF's competition here
HLBZF vs FRCEF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, FRCEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while FRCEF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas FRCEF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRCEF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and FRCEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRCEF's competition here
HLBZF vs IMYSF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, IMYSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while IMYSF trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas IMYSF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMYSF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and IMYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMYSF's competition here
HLBZF vs WCHNF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, WCHNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while WCHNF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas WCHNF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WCHNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and WCHNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WCHNF's competition here
HLBZF vs CARCY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CARCY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CARCY trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CARCY's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CARCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and CARCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CARCY's competition here
HLBZF vs ADBCF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, ADBCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while ADBCF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas ADBCF's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and ADBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADBCF's competition here
HLBZF vs CJRCF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CJRCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CJRCF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CJRCF's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CJRCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and CJRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CJRCF's competition here
HLBZF vs CCGLF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CCGLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CCGLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CCGLF's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCGLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and CCGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCGLF's competition here
HLBZF vs PSGTF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, PSGTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while PSGTF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas PSGTF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSGTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and PSGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSGTF's competition here
HLBZF vs PSGTY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, PSGTY has a market cap of 990.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while PSGTY trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas PSGTY's P/E ratio is 98.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSGTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and PSGTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSGTY's competition here
HLBZF vs PITPY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, PITPY has a market cap of 958.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while PITPY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas PITPY's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PITPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and PITPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PITPY's competition here
HLBZF vs PTHIF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, PTHIF has a market cap of 894.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while PTHIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas PTHIF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTHIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and PTHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTHIF's competition here
HLBZF vs SUCEF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, SUCEF has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while SUCEF trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas SUCEF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUCEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and SUCEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUCEF's competition here
HLBZF vs BBMPY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, BBMPY has a market cap of 811.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while BBMPY trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas BBMPY's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBMPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to BBMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check BBMPY's competition here
HLBZF vs IBJHF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, IBJHF has a market cap of 777.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while IBJHF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas IBJHF's P/E ratio is 49.25. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IBJHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to IBJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check IBJHF's competition here
HLBZF vs MCEM Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, MCEM has a market cap of 675.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while MCEM trades at $258.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas MCEM's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCEM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to MCEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check MCEM's competition here
HLBZF vs CWXZF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CWXZF has a market cap of 660.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CWXZF trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CWXZF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CWXZF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to CWXZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check CWXZF's competition here
HLBZF vs CMTOY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CMTOY has a market cap of 630M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CMTOY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CMTOY's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and CMTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMTOY's competition here
HLBZF vs CGCLF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CGCLF has a market cap of 553.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CGCLF trades at $22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CGCLF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGCLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to CGCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check CGCLF's competition here
HLBZF vs FTTRF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, FTTRF has a market cap of 501M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while FTTRF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas FTTRF's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and FTTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FTTRF's competition here
HLBZF vs PPCLY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, PPCLY has a market cap of 500.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while PPCLY trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas PPCLY's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPCLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and PPCLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPCLY's competition here
HLBZF vs BHBSY Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, BHBSY has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while BHBSY trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas BHBSY's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHBSY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and BHBSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BHBSY's competition here
HLBZF vs TGAFF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, TGAFF has a market cap of 304.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while TGAFF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas TGAFF's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to TGAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check TGAFF's competition here
HLBZF vs CHYMF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CHYMF has a market cap of 263.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CHYMF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CHYMF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHYMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and CHYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHYMF's competition here
HLBZF vs BSND Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, BSND has a market cap of 101.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while BSND trades at $750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas BSND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and BSND have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSND's competition here
HLBZF vs BURCP Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, BURCP has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while BURCP trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas BURCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BURCP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and BURCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BURCP's competition here
HLBZF vs SPPCF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, SPPCF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while SPPCF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas SPPCF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPPCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and SPPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPPCF's competition here
HLBZF vs CTXXF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CTXXF has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CTXXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CTXXF's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTXXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to CTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check CTXXF's competition here
HLBZF vs ZHIXF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, ZHIXF has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while ZHIXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas ZHIXF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZHIXF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to ZHIXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check ZHIXF's competition here
HLBZF vs LKSGF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, LKSGF has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while LKSGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas LKSGF's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LKSGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and LKSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LKSGF's competition here
HLBZF vs RTGOF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, RTGOF has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while RTGOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas RTGOF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTGOF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and RTGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTGOF's competition here
HLBZF vs ACPS Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, ACPS has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while ACPS trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas ACPS's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACPS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to ACPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check ACPS's competition here
HLBZF vs BASA Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, BASA has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while BASA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas BASA's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BASA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and BASA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BASA's competition here
HLBZF vs PNLT Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, PNLT has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while PNLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas PNLT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNLT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and PNLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNLT's competition here
HLBZF vs SNLP Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, SNLP has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while SNLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas SNLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNLP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and SNLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNLP's competition here
HLBZF vs CHGS Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, CHGS has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while CHGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas CHGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHGS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and CHGS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHGS's competition here
HLBZF vs WWST Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, WWST has a market cap of 33. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while WWST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas WWST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WWST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and WWST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WWST's competition here
HLBZF vs TJSS Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, TJSS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while TJSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas TJSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TJSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to TJSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.Check TJSS's competition here
HLBZF vs LXRRF Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, LXRRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while LXRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas LXRRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LXRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and LXRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LXRRF's competition here
HLBZF vs AQCP Comparison April 2026
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 38.4B. In comparison, AQCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $215.24, while AQCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.70, whereas AQCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AQCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF and AQCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AQCP's competition here