Under Armour, Inc.
Under Armour, Inc. UAA Peers
See (UAA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAA | $6.76 | +2.82% | 2.8B | -14.37 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| RL | $274.76 | -0.13% | 16.6B | 23.67 | $11.61 | +1.20% |
| GIL | $47.83 | +0.40% | 7.2B | 18.83 | $2.54 | +1.80% |
| LEVI | $17.44 | +0.93% | 6.9B | 19.38 | $0.90 | +2.98% |
| VFC | $12.71 | +0.91% | 5B | 70.58 | $0.18 | +2.82% |
| KTB | $69.27 | +1.70% | 3.8B | 17.02 | $4.07 | +2.95% |
| COLM | $61.78 | +0.78% | 3.4B | 16.01 | $3.86 | +1.95% |
| PVH | $65.38 | -1.39% | 3.1B | 9.22 | $7.09 | +0.23% |
| UA | $6.33 | +2.68% | 2.8B | -13.46 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| ZGN | $8.52 | -0.29% | 2.2B | 25.04 | $0.34 | +1.53% |
Stock Comparison
UAA vs RL Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while RL trades at $274.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs GIL Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while GIL trades at $47.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs LEVI Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while LEVI trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs VFC Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while VFC trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is 70.58. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VFC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs KTB Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while KTB trades at $69.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs COLM Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while COLM trades at $61.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs PVH Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while PVH trades at $65.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs UA Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while UA trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -13.46. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs ZGN Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while ZGN trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs AIN Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while AIN trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs HBI Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while HBI trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HBI's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs GOOS Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while GOOS trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs GIII Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 974.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while GIII trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is less volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs OXM Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 816.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while OXM trades at $54.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OXM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs FIGS Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 785.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while FIGS trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 509.00. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs LAKE Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 171.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while LAKE trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs SGC Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while SGC trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs UFI Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while UFI trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs CULP Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while CULP trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs JRSH Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while JRSH trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JRSH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs VNCE Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while VNCE trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs JL Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while JL trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs LLL Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while LLL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LLL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is less volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs PMNT Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while PMNT trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is less volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs NCI Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while NCI trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NCI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is less volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs DXYN Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while DXYN trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is more volatile compared to DXYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs JXJT Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is less volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs XELB Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while XELB trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is less volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs DLA Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs SQBG Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SQBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while SQBG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas SQBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SQBG's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is less volatile compared to SQBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs KBSF Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KBSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while KBSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas KBSF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KBSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is less volatile compared to KBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.
UAA vs EVK Comparison
UAA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EVK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UAA is priced at $6.76, while EVK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.37, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UAA is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAA.