Under Armour, Inc.
Under Armour, Inc. UA Peers
See (UA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UA | $6.48 | -1.89% | 2.9B | -14.14 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| RL | $286.95 | -1.24% | 17.6B | 24.96 | $11.61 | +1.45% |
| LEVI | $22.15 | +14.18% | 7.8B | 21.94 | $0.90 | +3.22% |
| GIL | $51.06 | +1.01% | 7.8B | 20.12 | $2.55 | +2.08% |
| VFC | $12.43 | -0.28% | 5B | 71.81 | $0.18 | +3.49% |
| KTB | $68.29 | -1.39% | 3.9B | 17.33 | $4.07 | +3.61% |
| PVH | $73.85 | +1.74% | 3.6B | 10.48 | $7.09 | +0.25% |
| COLM | $61.42 | -2.81% | 3.5B | 16.47 | $3.86 | +1.88% |
| UAA | $6.89 | -0.65% | 2.9B | -15.07 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| ZGN | $8.90 | -0.56% | 2.3B | 26.03 | $0.35 | +1.51% |
Stock Comparison
UA vs RL Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while RL trades at $286.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is more volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs LEVI Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while LEVI trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs GIL Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while GIL trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is more volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs VFC Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while VFC trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is 71.81. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VFC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs KTB Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while KTB trades at $68.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs PVH Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while PVH trades at $73.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is more volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs COLM Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while COLM trades at $61.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs UAA Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while UAA trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -15.07. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs ZGN Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while ZGN trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is more volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs AIN Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while AIN trades at $69.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is more volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs HBI Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while HBI trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is -31.53. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HBI's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs GOOS Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while GOOS trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs GIII Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while GIII trades at $23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is more volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs FIGS Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while FIGS trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 616.00. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs OXM Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 732.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while OXM trades at $47.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OXM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs SGC Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 178M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while SGC trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is more volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs LAKE Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while LAKE trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is more volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs UFI Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while UFI trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is more volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs CULP Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while CULP trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is more volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs NCI Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while NCI trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NCI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs JRSH Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while JRSH trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is -47.14. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JRSH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is more volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs JL Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while JL trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 0.91. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs VNCE Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while VNCE trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs LLL Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while LLL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LLL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs PMNT Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while PMNT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -6.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs DXYN Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while DXYN trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to DXYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs JXJT Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs XELB Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while XELB trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs DLA Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs EVK Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EVK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while EVK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs KBSF Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KBSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while KBSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas KBSF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KBSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to KBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.
UA vs SQBG Comparison
UA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SQBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UA is priced at $6.48, while SQBG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UA currently has a P/E ratio of -14.14, whereas SQBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SQBG's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UA is less volatile compared to SQBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UA.