Tufin Software Technologies Ltd.
Tufin Software Technologies Ltd. TUFN Peers
See (TUFN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUFN | $12.94 | +2.54% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSFT | $474.96 | -0.82% | 3.5T | 36.68 | $12.95 | +0.68% |
| ORCL | $215.34 | +7.75% | 603.9B | 49.62 | $4.34 | +0.79% |
| PLTR | $137.30 | +1.56% | 310.7B | 624.09 | $0.22 | N/A |
| ADBE | $391.73 | -5.31% | 167B | 25.11 | $15.60 | N/A |
| PANW | $196.28 | -0.70% | 130.9B | 113.46 | $1.73 | N/A |
| CRWD | $480.62 | -0.23% | 119.8B | -686.60 | -$0.70 | N/A |
| FTNT | $100.83 | -0.82% | 77.2B | 41.49 | $2.43 | N/A |
| SNPS | $478.86 | -3.26% | 74.3B | 55.30 | $8.66 | N/A |
| CRWV | $147.19 | -1.19% | 70.5B | -58.18 | -$2.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TUFN vs MSFT Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while MSFT trades at $474.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs ORCL Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 603.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while ORCL trades at $215.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 49.62. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs PLTR Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 310.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while PLTR trades at $137.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 624.09. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs ADBE Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 167B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while ADBE trades at $391.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs PANW Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 130.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while PANW trades at $196.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 113.46. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs CRWD Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 119.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while CRWD trades at $480.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -686.60. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs FTNT Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while FTNT trades at $100.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 41.49. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs SNPS Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while SNPS trades at $478.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 55.30. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs CRWV Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while CRWV trades at $147.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -58.18. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs HOOD Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while HOOD trades at $72.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 41.49. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs VMW Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs NET Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while NET trades at $171.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -747.30. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs SQ Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs ZS Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while ZS trades at $301.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1118.33. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs XYZ Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while XYZ trades at $61.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs NETE Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs SPLK Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs VRSN Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while VRSN trades at $279.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs GDDY Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while GDDY trades at $175.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 33.86. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs TOST Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while TOST trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 153.89. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs CHKP Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while CHKP trades at $218.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs CPAY Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while CPAY trades at $323.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs IOT Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while IOT trades at $39.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -186.64. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs FLT Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs CYBR Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while CYBR trades at $386.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -189.55. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs NTNX Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while NTNX trades at $72.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -277.42. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs AFRM Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while AFRM trades at $59.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -311.16. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs GEN Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while GEN trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs RBRK Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while RBRK trades at $90.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs MDB Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while MDB trades at $205.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -188.68. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs FFIV Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while FFIV trades at $286.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs KSPI Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while KSPI trades at $86.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs OKTA Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while OKTA trades at $97.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 149.95. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs NLOK Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs SAIL Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while SAIL trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs AKAM Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while AKAM trades at $77.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs DOX Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while DOX trades at $91.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs ALTR Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs PLAN Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs KVYO Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while KVYO trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -196.35. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs INFA Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while INFA trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 803.00. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs WIX Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while WIX trades at $149.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 59.17. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs CFLT Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while CFLT trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -24.38. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs DBX Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while DBX trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs HCP Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs JCOM Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs PATH Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while PATH trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -101.96. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs SQSP Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN and SQSP have similar daily volatility (0.23).
TUFN vs NEWR Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs FOUR Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while FOUR trades at $88.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs CCCS Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while CCCS trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 880.00. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs S Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while S trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.06. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs VRNS Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while VRNS trades at $49.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -60.52. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs BOX Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while BOX trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs SPSC Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while SPSC trades at $134.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 61.27. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs QLYS Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while QLYS trades at $138.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs NVEI Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs ACIW Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while ACIW trades at $45.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs WEX Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while WEX trades at $137.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs EEFT Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while EEFT trades at $107.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs ODD Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while ODD trades at $72.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 41.54. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs RELY Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while RELY trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -645.00. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs TENB Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while TENB trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -83.84. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs ESMT Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs AVPT Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while AVPT trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -143.00. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs CLBT Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while CLBT trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -17.14. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs STNE Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while STNE trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.42. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs CORZ Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while CORZ trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs CORZZ Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while CORZZ trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs SWI Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs EVOP Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs DLO Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while DLO trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs PAGS Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while PAGS trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs MQ Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while MQ trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 53.80. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs BB Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while BB trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -408.50. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs DOCN Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while DOCN trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs PAYO Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while PAYO trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs EVTC Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while EVTC trades at $35.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs WRD Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while WRD trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to WRD's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs APPN Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while APPN trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -35.51. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs GETVV Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs TDC Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while TDC trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs RAMP Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while RAMP trades at $31.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -782.25. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs FIVN Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while FIVN trades at $26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -444.17. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs AVDX Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while AVDX trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 243.75. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs FORG Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs GSKY Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs CSGS Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while CSGS trades at $63.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs CORZW Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while CORZW trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs GET Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs EVCM Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while EVCM trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -78.67. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs NTCT Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while NTCT trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs STER Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs ZUO Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs RPD Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while RPD trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 57.39. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs SUMO Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs GB Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while GB trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs AVPTW Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while AVPTW trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.
TUFN vs PGYWW Comparison
TUFN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUFN stands at 0. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUFN is priced at $12.94, while PGYWW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUFN's ROE is -0.57%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TUFN is more volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUFN.