TDK Corporation
TDK Corporation TTDKY Peers
See (TTDKY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTDKY | $10.58 | +0.95% | 20.1B | 17.06 | $0.62 | +0.89% |
| KYCCF | $402.50 | +0.05% | 97.6B | 34.94 | $11.52 | +0.57% |
| HNHPF | $10.34 | +0.71% | 71.8B | 12.77 | $0.81 | +0.11% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | N/A | 45.2B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +0.17% |
| MRAAF | $15.36 | -6.29% | 28.6B | 17.65 | $0.87 | +2.69% |
| HXGBY | $10.10 | +0.20% | 27.4B | 24.63 | $0.41 | +1.53% |
| MRAAY | $7.21 | +1.05% | 27.1B | 16.77 | $0.43 | +0.72% |
| HXGBF | $10.16 | -5.04% | 26.2B | 24.78 | $0.41 | +1.56% |
| TTDKF | $11.00 | -0.02% | 20.9B | 18.03 | $0.61 | +1.86% |
| VEMLY | $42.50 | -0.70% | 13B | 13.00 | $3.27 | +5.18% |
Stock Comparison
TTDKY vs KYCCF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while KYCCF trades at $402.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 34.94. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HNHPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while HNHPF trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HNHAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to HNHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs MRAAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while MRAAF trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HXGBY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while HXGBY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs MRAAY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while MRAAY trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY and MRAAY have similar daily volatility (0.69).
TTDKY vs HXGBF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while HXGBF trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to HXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TTDKF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while TTDKF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs VEMLY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while VEMLY trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs BYDIY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while BYDIY trades at $205.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SOTGY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while SOTGY trades at $82.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs BYDIF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while BYDIF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SNPTF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while SNPTF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SHMZF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while SHMZF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs MNBEY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to MNBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs MNBEF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while MNBEF trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs IBIDF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while IBIDF trades at $40.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs OMRNY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while OMRNY trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 44.51. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs AUOTY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while AUOTY trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is 35.38. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HRSEF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while HRSEF trades at $105.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HPHTF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while HPHTF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HPHTY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while HPHTY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SEPJF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while SEPJF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs VEMLF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HRIBF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SEPJY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while SEPJY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TOPCF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while TOPCF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 746.13. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs RNSHF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while RNSHF trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TYOYY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while TYOYY trades at $68.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 152.80. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs APELF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to APELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs FITGF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while FITGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs APELY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while APELY trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs CODAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs KGBLY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while KGBLY trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs AMANF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs NPEGF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while NPEGF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -156.79. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs VAIAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs JELLF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while JELLF trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs NILRF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to NILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs JNPKF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while JNPKF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs JPAVF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs BCNAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while BCNAF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs CAZGF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while CAZGF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -138.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs AITUF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while AITUF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs AUDGF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while AUDGF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to AUDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ASAAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 831.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs BCNAY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 594.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while BCNAY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs KRKNF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 538.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while KRKNF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs VARXF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 531.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while VARXF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs JNNDF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HNMUF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 461.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs JPDYY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to JPDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs KACPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 438M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while KACPF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HROEY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while HROEY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TRUHF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while TRUHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs NNFTF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TTGPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 228.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while TTGPF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs NPTSF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 211.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while NPTSF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs FUBAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while FUBAF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -92.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SMOPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to SMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs CHAEF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HUDLF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to HUDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ENMPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while ENMPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs IACYF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ENMPY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while ENMPY trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs IKGPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to IKGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SDIIF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs MPAD Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SILLF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while SILLF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs BMNR Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while BMNR trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ACFN Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while ACFN trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs AATC Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while AATC trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs YNVYF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while YNVYF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs IEHC Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while IEHC trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ERMG Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to ERMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs NSCIF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while NSCIF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs INRD Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs WELX Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while WELX trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs KESPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to KESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs FGRRF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ROBOF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while ROBOF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs AAIRF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while AAIRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs BNSOF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while BNSOF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SCND Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while SCND trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs LCTC Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while LCTC trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SIGL Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while SIGL trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs GNCLF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while GNCLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ESHSF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ZTSTF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while ZTSTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs DPLS Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TNLX Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while TNLX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs RMTD Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RMTD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TRCK Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while TRCK trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs MRRYF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs VPER Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs UCLE Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, UCLE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while UCLE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas UCLE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UCLE's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to UCLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs VPIM Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while VPIM trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs EQTL Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, EQTL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while EQTL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas EQTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQTL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to EQTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs NXOPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.58, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.06, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.