TDK Corporation
TDK Corporation TTDKY Peers
See (TTDKY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTDKY | $10.80 | -1.26% | 20.49B | 18.31 | $0.59 | +0.87% |
| KYCCF | $439.41 | -0.11% | 106.57B | 39.59 | $11.10 | +0.51% |
| HNHPF | $10.44 | -1.04% | 72.51B | 14.70 | $0.71 | +0.11% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | N/A | 45.23B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +0.17% |
| MRAAF | $14.93 | +0.04% | 27.80B | 17.56 | $0.85 | +2.59% |
| HXGBF | $10.48 | +3.66% | 26.98B | 26.20 | $0.40 | +1.36% |
| HXGBY | $9.92 | -1.58% | 26.76B | 24.81 | $0.40 | +1.22% |
| MRAAY | $6.97 | -0.85% | 25.96B | 16.60 | $0.42 | +0.75% |
| TTDKF | $10.80 | -2.45% | 20.49B | 16.61 | $0.65 | +2.05% |
| VEMLY | $42.94 | -0.14% | 12.46B | 13.29 | $3.23 | +4.89% |
Stock Comparison
TTDKY vs KYCCF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 106.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while KYCCF trades at $439.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HNHPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 72.51B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while HNHPF trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HNHAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.23B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to HNHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs MRAAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 27.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while MRAAF trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HXGBF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 26.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while HXGBF trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to HXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HXGBY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 26.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while HXGBY trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs MRAAY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 25.96B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while MRAAY trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TTDKF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 20.49B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while TTDKF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs VEMLY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 12.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while VEMLY trades at $42.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs BYDIY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 9.96B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while BYDIY trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs BYDIF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 9.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while BYDIF trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SOTGY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 9.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while SOTGY trades at $83.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SNPTF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while SNPTF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs MNBEY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.75B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to MNBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SHMZF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 6.53B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while SHMZF trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs MNBEF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while MNBEF trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs OMRNY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while OMRNY trades at $27.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 48.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs IBIDF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while IBIDF trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs AUOTY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while AUOTY trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is -47.31. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HRSEF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while HRSEF trades at $105.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HPHTF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while HPHTF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs KGBLY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while KGBLY trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs VEMLF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SEPJF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while SEPJF trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HRIBF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SEPJY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while SEPJY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TOPCF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while TOPCF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 746.13. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HPHTY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while HPHTY trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TYOYY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while TYOYY trades at $70.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 159.65. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs RNSHF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while RNSHF trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs APELF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to APELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs CODAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs APELY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while APELY trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs AMANF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs VAIAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs JELLF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while JELLF trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs FITGF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while FITGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs NPEGF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while NPEGF trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -148.07. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs NILRF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to NILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs JNPKF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while JNPKF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs JPAVF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs BCNAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while BCNAF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs AITUF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while AITUF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs AUDGF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 833.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while AUDGF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to AUDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ASAAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 736.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs CAZGF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 692.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while CAZGF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs BCNAY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 600.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while BCNAY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs VARXF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 531.70M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while VARXF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs JNNDF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 488.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HNMUF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 468.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs JPDYY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.89M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to JPDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs KRKNF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 457.23M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while KRKNF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HROEY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 371.85M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while HROEY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TRUHF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 366.69M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while TRUHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs NNFTF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 330.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs KACPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 225.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while KACPF trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TTGPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 181.07M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while TTGPF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SMOPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to SMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs NPTSF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 166.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while NPTSF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs CHAEF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.25M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs FUBAF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 126.27M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while FUBAF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -74.42. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs HUDLF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.51M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to HUDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ENMPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 119.28M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while ENMPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ENMPY Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 110.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while ENMPY trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs IACYF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ODYS Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 88.55M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while ODYS trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs IKGPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to IKGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SDIIF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs MPAD Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ACFN Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 45.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while ACFN trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SILLF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 44.82M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while SILLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs AATC Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 40.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while AATC trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs YNVYF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 23.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while YNVYF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs FGRRF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 22.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ERMG Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to ERMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ROBOF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 22.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while ROBOF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs IEHC Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 22.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while IEHC trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs NSCIF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 21.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while NSCIF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs INRD Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.28M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs WELX Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 17.24M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while WELX trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs BMNR Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 15.87M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while BMNR trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs KESPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.27M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to KESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs AAIRF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 12.61M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while AAIRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SIGL Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 11.26M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while SIGL trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs BNSOF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 10.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while BNSOF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SCND Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 8.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while SCND trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs LCTC Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 7.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while LCTC trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ZTSTF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 6.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while ZTSTF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs ESHSF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs GNCLF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 5.55M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while GNCLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TNLX Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 4.72M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while TNLX trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs DPLS Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 3.17M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs RMTD Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 2.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RMTD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs MRRYF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs TRCK Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 2.37M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while TRCK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs VPER Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 1.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is more volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs SRMX Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, SRMX has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while SRMX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas SRMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRMX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to SRMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs VPIM Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while VPIM trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.
TTDKY vs NXOPF Comparison
TTDKY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKY stands at 20.49B. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKY is priced at $10.80, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.31, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, TTDKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKY is less volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKY.