TDK Corporation
TDK Corporation TTDKF Peers
See (TTDKF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTDKF | $10.21 | -3.77% | 21.9B | 18.88 | $0.61 | +1.98% |
| KYCCF | $400.76 | -0.44% | 95B | 34.58 | $11.33 | +0.58% |
| HNHPF | $11.48 | +5.54% | 77B | 13.51 | $0.82 | +2.10% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | +0.12% | 45.2B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +5.12% |
| MRAAY | $7.29 | -1.49% | 27.5B | 17.02 | $0.43 | +1.41% |
| MRAAF | $15.20 | -1.36% | 26.5B | 16.56 | $0.86 | +2.88% |
| HXGBY | $10.05 | +0.40% | 26.5B | 24.10 | $0.41 | +1.57% |
| HXGBF | $10.55 | +1.44% | 26.2B | 24.85 | $0.41 | +1.56% |
| TTDKY | $11.16 | -4.45% | 21.6B | 18.64 | $0.61 | +1.47% |
| VEMLY | $43.51 | -2.22% | 13.9B | 13.82 | $3.29 | +6.31% |
Stock Comparison
TTDKF vs KYCCF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 95B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while KYCCF trades at $400.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs HNHPF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while HNHPF trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs HNHAF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to HNHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs MRAAY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while MRAAY trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs MRAAF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while MRAAF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs HXGBY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while HXGBY trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs HXGBF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while HXGBF trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to HXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs TTDKY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while TTDKY trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs VEMLY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while VEMLY trades at $43.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs SOTGY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while SOTGY trades at $84.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs BYDIY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while BYDIY trades at $207.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs BYDIF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while BYDIF trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs SNPTF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while SNPTF trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs MNBEY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to MNBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs SHMZF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while SHMZF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs MNBEF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while MNBEF trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs SEPJF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while SEPJF trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs OMRNY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while OMRNY trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 46.91. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs IBIDF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while IBIDF trades at $45.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs SEPJY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while SEPJY trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs HRSEF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while HRSEF trades at $105.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs KGBLY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while KGBLY trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs HROEY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while HROEY trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs AUOTY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while AUOTY trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs HPHTF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while HPHTF trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs HPHTY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while HPHTY trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs VEMLF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs HRIBF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs TOPCF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while TOPCF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 766.67. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs TYOYY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while TYOYY trades at $70.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 152.36. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs RNSHF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while RNSHF trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs APELY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while APELY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs FITGF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while FITGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs APELF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to APELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs JELLF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while JELLF trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs NPEGF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while NPEGF trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs AMANF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs VAIAF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs NILRF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to NILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs AITUF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while AITUF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs CODAF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs BCNAF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while BCNAF trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs ASAAF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs JNPKF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while JNPKF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs CAZGF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while CAZGF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -143.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs JPAVF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs BCNAY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 674.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while BCNAY trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs VARXF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 633.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while VARXF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs KRKNF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 593.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while KRKNF trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 37.67. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs TRUHF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 525.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while TRUHF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs JNNDF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 488.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs HNMUF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 480.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs JPDYY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to JPDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs AUDGF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 333.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while AUDGF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to AUDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs NNFTF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 324.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs CHAEF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 302M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs BMNR Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 275.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while BMNR trades at $56.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -15.13. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs TTGPF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 248.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while TTGPF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs NPTSF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 220.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while NPTSF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs KACPF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 198.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while KACPF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs FUBAF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while FUBAF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -92.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs SMOPF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to SMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs HUDLF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to HUDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs ENMPY Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 113M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while ENMPY trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs IACYF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs ENMPF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while ENMPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs IKGPF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to IKGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs SDIIF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs MPAD Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs SILLF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while SILLF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -14.84. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs ACFN Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while ACFN trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs AATC Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while AATC trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs WELX Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while WELX trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs IEHC Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while IEHC trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is less volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs ERMG Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to ERMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs YNVYF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while YNVYF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs NSCIF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while NSCIF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs INRD Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs VPIM Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while VPIM trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is less volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs ROBOF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while ROBOF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs KESPF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to KESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs FGRRF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs BNSOF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while BNSOF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs AAIRF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while AAIRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs LCTC Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while LCTC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs SCND Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while SCND trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs ZTSTF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while ZTSTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs GNCLF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while GNCLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs SIGL Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while SIGL trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs TNLX Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while TNLX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs DPLS Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is less volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs VPER Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs TRCK Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while TRCK trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs LBAS Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, LBAS has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while LBAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas LBAS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LBAS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to LBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs SRMX Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SRMX has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while SRMX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas SRMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRMX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to SRMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs NXOPF Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs UCLE Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, UCLE has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while UCLE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas UCLE's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UCLE's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is more volatile compared to UCLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs TKOI Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TKOI has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while TKOI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas TKOI's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TKOI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is less volatile compared to TKOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.
TTDKF vs TRCC Comparison
TTDKF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTDKF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TRCC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTDKF is priced at $10.21, while TRCC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTDKF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas TRCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTDKF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTDKF is less volatile compared to TRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTDKF.