361 Degrees International Limited
361 Degrees International Limited (TSIOF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TSIOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSIOF | $0.92 | +0.09% | 1.9B | 10.24 | $0.09 | +4.24% |
| ADDDF | $156.79 | -3.64% | 29.1B | 18.64 | $8.75 | +1.38% |
| ADDYY | $80.62 | +0.14% | 29B | 18.55 | $4.38 | +1.39% |
| ASCCY | $28.18 | +2.14% | 19.8B | 32.11 | $0.87 | +0.45% |
| ASCCF | $26.00 | -13.33% | 18.4B | 29.89 | $0.87 | +0.71% |
| BCUCF | $95.60 | +0.00% | 6.5B | 42.11 | $2.27 | +1.11% |
| PUMSY | $2.88 | -1.37% | 4.2B | -5.65 | -$0.51 | +2.40% |
| PMMAF | $28.90 | -5.64% | 4.2B | -5.51 | -$5.12 | +2.45% |
| YUEIY | $9.49 | -3.06% | 3B | 7.97 | $1.19 | +8.39% |
| YUEIF | $1.89 | -9.38% | 3B | 7.85 | $0.24 | +8.81% |
Stock Comparison
TSIOF vs ADDDF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADDDF has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while ADDDF trades at $156.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ADDDF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADDDF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF is less volatile compared to ADDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSIOF.Check ADDDF's competition here
TSIOF vs ADDYY Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADDYY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while ADDYY trades at $80.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ADDYY's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADDYY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF is less volatile compared to ADDYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSIOF.Check ADDYY's competition here
TSIOF vs ASCCY Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ASCCY has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while ASCCY trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ASCCY's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASCCY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF is less volatile compared to ASCCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSIOF.Check ASCCY's competition here
TSIOF vs ASCCF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ASCCF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while ASCCF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ASCCF's P/E ratio is 29.89. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASCCF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and ASCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASCCF's competition here
TSIOF vs BCUCF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BCUCF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while BCUCF trades at $95.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BCUCF's P/E ratio is 42.11. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCUCF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and BCUCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCUCF's competition here
TSIOF vs PUMSY Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PUMSY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while PUMSY trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PUMSY's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PUMSY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF is less volatile compared to PUMSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSIOF.Check PUMSY's competition here
TSIOF vs PMMAF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PMMAF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while PMMAF trades at $28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PMMAF's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PMMAF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and PMMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMMAF's competition here
TSIOF vs YUEIY Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, YUEIY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while YUEIY trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas YUEIY's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YUEIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and YUEIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YUEIY's competition here
TSIOF vs YUEIF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, YUEIF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while YUEIF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas YUEIF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YUEIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and YUEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YUEIF's competition here
TSIOF vs HUGPF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HUGPF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while HUGPF trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas HUGPF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUGPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and HUGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUGPF's competition here
TSIOF vs SMSEY Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SMSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while SMSEY trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SMSEY's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMSEY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF is less volatile compared to SMSEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSIOF.Check SMSEY's competition here
TSIOF vs SMSOF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SMSOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while SMSOF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SMSOF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMSOF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and SMSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMSOF's competition here
TSIOF vs SLNLY Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SLNLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while SLNLY trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SLNLY's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLNLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and SLNLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLNLY's competition here
TSIOF vs TODGF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TODGF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while TODGF trades at $37.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas TODGF's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TODGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and TODGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TODGF's competition here
TSIOF vs DRMTY Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DRMTY has a market cap of 870.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while DRMTY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DRMTY's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRMTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and DRMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRMTY's competition here
TSIOF vs DOCMF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DOCMF has a market cap of 826.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while DOCMF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DOCMF's P/E ratio is 42.77. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DOCMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and DOCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DOCMF's competition here
TSIOF vs FXWZF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FXWZF has a market cap of 477.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while FXWZF trades at $30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas FXWZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FXWZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and FXWZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FXWZF's competition here
TSIOF vs TDPAY Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TDPAY has a market cap of 151M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while TDPAY trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas TDPAY's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDPAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and TDPAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TDPAY's competition here
TSIOF vs GXSBF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GXSBF has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while GXSBF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas GXSBF's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GXSBF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and GXSBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GXSBF's competition here
TSIOF vs GXSBY Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GXSBY has a market cap of 119.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while GXSBY trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas GXSBY's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GXSBY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and GXSBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GXSBY's competition here
TSIOF vs MCRAA Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MCRAA has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while MCRAA trades at $46.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MCRAA's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCRAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and MCRAA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCRAA's competition here
TSIOF vs MCRAB Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MCRAB has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while MCRAB trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MCRAB's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCRAB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and MCRAB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCRAB's competition here
TSIOF vs DPNEY Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DPNEY has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while DPNEY trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DPNEY's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DPNEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF is less volatile compared to DPNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSIOF.Check DPNEY's competition here
TSIOF vs LESAF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LESAF has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while LESAF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas LESAF's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LESAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and LESAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LESAF's competition here
TSIOF vs BSHI Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BSHI has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while BSHI trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BSHI's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BSHI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and BSHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSHI's competition here
TSIOF vs DPNEF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DPNEF has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while DPNEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DPNEF's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DPNEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and DPNEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DPNEF's competition here
TSIOF vs KMSWF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KMSWF has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while KMSWF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas KMSWF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMSWF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and KMSWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMSWF's competition here
TSIOF vs TIEMF Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TIEMF has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while TIEMF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas TIEMF's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIEMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and TIEMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIEMF's competition here
TSIOF vs GVSI Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GVSI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while GVSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas GVSI's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVSI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF is less volatile compared to GVSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSIOF.Check GVSI's competition here
TSIOF vs RBNW Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RBNW has a market cap of 939.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while RBNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas RBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBNW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and RBNW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RBNW's competition here
TSIOF vs ATYM Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ATYM has a market cap of 265.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while ATYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ATYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATYM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF is less volatile compared to ATYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSIOF.Check ATYM's competition here
TSIOF vs CHSH Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CHSH has a market cap of 199.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while CHSH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CHSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHSH's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and CHSH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHSH's competition here
TSIOF vs PXFG Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PXFG has a market cap of 114.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while PXFG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PXFG's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PXFG's ROE of -5.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and PXFG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXFG's competition here
TSIOF vs DKGR Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DKGR has a market cap of 44.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while DKGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DKGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DKGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF is less volatile compared to DKGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSIOF.Check DKGR's competition here
TSIOF vs SAML Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SAML has a market cap of 21.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while SAML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SAML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAML's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and SAML have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAML's competition here
TSIOF vs BRKO Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BRKO has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while BRKO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BRKO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BRKO's ROE of -4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF is less volatile compared to BRKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSIOF.Check BRKO's competition here
TSIOF vs QING Comparison May 2026
TSIOF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSIOF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, QING has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TSIOF is priced at $0.92, while QING trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSIOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas QING's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TSIOF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QING's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TSIOF and QING have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QING's competition here