TraceSafe Inc.
TraceSafe Inc. TSF.CN Peers
See (TSF.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSF.CN | $0.08 | N/A | N/A | -0.34 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| CRM.NE | $22.91 | +0.09% | 392.05B | 44.06 | $0.52 | +0.56% |
| CSU.TO | $5,066.89 | +0.07% | 107.37B | 104.24 | $48.61 | +0.11% |
| CDAY.TO | $93.38 | +0.38% | 14.58B | 2334.50 | $0.04 | N/A |
| DSG.TO | $158.77 | +0.87% | 13.56B | 69.64 | $2.28 | N/A |
| OTEX.TO | $39.34 | +0.77% | 10.19B | 11.50 | $3.42 | +3.66% |
| KXS.TO | $197.98 | -0.98% | 5.56B | 412.46 | $0.48 | N/A |
| LSPD.TO | $15.15 | +1.81% | 2.32B | -13.65 | -$1.11 | N/A |
| MAGT.TO | $44.24 | N/A | 1.83B | 368.67 | $0.12 | N/A |
| ENGH.TO | $26.66 | -1.08% | 1.47B | 17.31 | $1.54 | +4.05% |
Stock Comparison
TSF.CN vs CRM.NE Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, CRM.NE has a market cap of 392.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while CRM.NE trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CRM.NE's P/E ratio is 44.06. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to CRM.NE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CRM.NE has daily volatility of 0.39.
TSF.CN vs CSU.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, CSU.TO has a market cap of 107.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while CSU.TO trades at $5,066.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CSU.TO's P/E ratio is 104.24. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to CSU.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CSU.TO has daily volatility of 1.62.
TSF.CN vs CDAY.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, CDAY.TO has a market cap of 14.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while CDAY.TO trades at $93.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CDAY.TO's P/E ratio is 2334.50. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to CDAY.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CDAY.TO has daily volatility of 1.80.
TSF.CN vs DSG.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, DSG.TO has a market cap of 13.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while DSG.TO trades at $158.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DSG.TO's P/E ratio is 69.64. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to DSG.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and DSG.TO has daily volatility of 1.44.
TSF.CN vs OTEX.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, OTEX.TO has a market cap of 10.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while OTEX.TO trades at $39.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas OTEX.TO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to OTEX.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and OTEX.TO has daily volatility of 1.28.
TSF.CN vs KXS.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, KXS.TO has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while KXS.TO trades at $197.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas KXS.TO's P/E ratio is 412.46. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to KXS.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and KXS.TO has daily volatility of 0.98.
TSF.CN vs LSPD.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, LSPD.TO has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while LSPD.TO trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas LSPD.TO's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to LSPD.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LSPD.TO has daily volatility of 2.06.
TSF.CN vs MAGT.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, MAGT.TO has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while MAGT.TO trades at $44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MAGT.TO's P/E ratio is 368.67. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to MAGT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MAGT.TO has daily volatility of 0.02.
TSF.CN vs ENGH.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, ENGH.TO has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while ENGH.TO trades at $26.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ENGH.TO's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to ENGH.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ENGH.TO has daily volatility of 1.35.
TSF.CN vs DCBO.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, DCBO.TO has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while DCBO.TO trades at $37.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DCBO.TO's P/E ratio is 36.23. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to DCBO.TO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and DCBO.TO has daily volatility of 1.67.
TSF.CN vs ABST.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, ABST.TO has a market cap of 808.03M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while ABST.TO trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ABST.TO's P/E ratio is -23.03. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to ABST.TO's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ABST.TO has daily volatility of 0.92.
TSF.CN vs CMG.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, CMG.TO has a market cap of 685.88M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while CMG.TO trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CMG.TO's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to CMG.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CMG.TO has daily volatility of 2.08.
TSF.CN vs BLN.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, BLN.TO has a market cap of 629.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while BLN.TO trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BLN.TO's P/E ratio is -74.70. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to BLN.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BLN.TO has daily volatility of 1.07.
TSF.CN vs TCS.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, TCS.TO has a market cap of 623.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while TCS.TO trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TCS.TO's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to TCS.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TCS.TO has daily volatility of 1.18.
TSF.CN vs REAL.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, REAL.TO has a market cap of 441.09M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while REAL.TO trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas REAL.TO's P/E ratio is 198.67. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to REAL.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and REAL.TO has daily volatility of 1.51.
TSF.CN vs ABXX.NE Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, ABXX.NE has a market cap of 379.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while ABXX.NE trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ABXX.NE's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to ABXX.NE's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ABXX.NE has daily volatility of 10.43.
TSF.CN vs QFOR.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, QFOR.TO has a market cap of 242.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while QFOR.TO trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas QFOR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to QFOR.TO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and QFOR.TO has daily volatility of 0.17.
TSF.CN vs WNDR.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, WNDR.TO has a market cap of 224.83M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while WNDR.TO trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas WNDR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to WNDR.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WNDR.TO has daily volatility of 1.48.
TSF.CN vs SYZ.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, SYZ.TO has a market cap of 222.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while SYZ.TO trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SYZ.TO's P/E ratio is -317.67. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to SYZ.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SYZ.TO has daily volatility of 6.51.
TSF.CN vs THNC.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, THNC.TO has a market cap of 183.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while THNC.TO trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas THNC.TO's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to THNC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and THNC.TO has daily volatility of 2.63.
TSF.CN vs EINC.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, EINC.TO has a market cap of 163.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while EINC.TO trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EINC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to EINC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EINC.TO has daily volatility of 4.13.
TSF.CN vs IMP.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, IMP.TO has a market cap of 140.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while IMP.TO trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas IMP.TO's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to IMP.TO's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and IMP.TO has daily volatility of 17.86.
TSF.CN vs XTRA.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, XTRA.TO has a market cap of 101.57M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while XTRA.TO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas XTRA.TO's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to XTRA.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and XTRA.TO has daily volatility of 5.52.
TSF.CN vs URL.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, URL.CN has a market cap of 91.66M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while URL.CN trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas URL.CN's P/E ratio is 102.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to URL.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and URL.CN has daily volatility of 1.98.
TSF.CN vs MVP.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, MVP.TO has a market cap of 74.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while MVP.TO trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MVP.TO's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to MVP.TO's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MVP.TO has daily volatility of 1.17.
TSF.CN vs LGIQ.NE Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, LGIQ.NE has a market cap of 34.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while LGIQ.NE trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas LGIQ.NE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to LGIQ.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LGIQ.NE has daily volatility of 24.30.
TSF.CN vs AXCP.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, AXCP.CN has a market cap of 32.82M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while AXCP.CN trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas AXCP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to AXCP.CN's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AXCP.CN has daily volatility of 5.56.
TSF.CN vs TWOH.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, TWOH.CN has a market cap of 27.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while TWOH.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TWOH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to TWOH.CN's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TWOH.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs BLOX.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, BLOX.CN has a market cap of 21.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while BLOX.CN trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BLOX.CN's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to BLOX.CN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BLOX.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs LSPK.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, LSPK.TO has a market cap of 18.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while LSPK.TO trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas LSPK.TO's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to LSPK.TO's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LSPK.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs BNSL.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, BNSL.CN has a market cap of 15.27M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while BNSL.CN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BNSL.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to BNSL.CN's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BNSL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
TSF.CN vs ADCO.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, ADCO.TO has a market cap of 15.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while ADCO.TO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ADCO.TO's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to ADCO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ADCO.TO has daily volatility of 3.92.
TSF.CN vs HP.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, HP.CN has a market cap of 15.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while HP.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas HP.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to HP.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and HP.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs FDGE.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, FDGE.TO has a market cap of 14.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while FDGE.TO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FDGE.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to FDGE.TO's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FDGE.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs IGN.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, IGN.CN has a market cap of 12.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while IGN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas IGN.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to IGN.CN's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and IGN.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs VQS.TO Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, VQS.TO has a market cap of 12.04M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while VQS.TO trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas VQS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to VQS.TO's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VQS.TO has daily volatility of 13.64.
TSF.CN vs SPO.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, SPO.CN has a market cap of 9.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while SPO.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SPO.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to SPO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SPO.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs TONY.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, TONY.CN has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while TONY.CN trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TONY.CN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to TONY.CN's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TONY.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs EGTI.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, EGTI.CN has a market cap of 7.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while EGTI.CN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EGTI.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to EGTI.CN's ROE of +13.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EGTI.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs IAI.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, IAI.CN has a market cap of 5.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while IAI.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas IAI.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to IAI.CN's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and IAI.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs VSBY.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, VSBY.CN has a market cap of 5.21M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while VSBY.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas VSBY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to VSBY.CN's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VSBY.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs BYFM.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, BYFM.CN has a market cap of 4.55M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while BYFM.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas BYFM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to BYFM.CN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BYFM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs MWRK.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, MWRK.CN has a market cap of 4.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while MWRK.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas MWRK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to MWRK.CN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MWRK.CN has daily volatility of 13.33.
TSF.CN vs WFLD.V Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, WFLD.V has a market cap of 3.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while WFLD.V trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas WFLD.V's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to WFLD.V's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WFLD.V has daily volatility of 66.67.
TSF.CN vs LIQD.NE Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, LIQD.NE has a market cap of 3.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while LIQD.NE trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas LIQD.NE's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to LIQD.NE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LIQD.NE has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs ISFT.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, ISFT.CN has a market cap of 3.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while ISFT.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ISFT.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to ISFT.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ISFT.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs WHIP.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, WHIP.CN has a market cap of 3.26M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while WHIP.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas WHIP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to WHIP.CN's ROE of +262.96%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WHIP.CN has daily volatility of 31.58.
TSF.CN vs LQID.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, LQID.CN has a market cap of 3.25M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while LQID.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas LQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to LQID.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LQID.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs SKUR.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, SKUR.CN has a market cap of 3.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while SKUR.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SKUR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to SKUR.CN's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SKUR.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs KASH.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, KASH.CN has a market cap of 2.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while KASH.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas KASH.CN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to KASH.CN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and KASH.CN has daily volatility of 35.29.
TSF.CN vs GBMC.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, GBMC.CN has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while GBMC.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas GBMC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to GBMC.CN's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GBMC.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs CK.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, CK.CN has a market cap of 2.85M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while CK.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas CK.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to CK.CN's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CK.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs LUXX.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, LUXX.CN has a market cap of 2.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while LUXX.CN trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas LUXX.CN's P/E ratio is 0.60. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to LUXX.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LUXX.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs XRA.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, XRA.CN has a market cap of 2.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while XRA.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas XRA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to XRA.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and XRA.CN has daily volatility of 66.67.
TSF.CN vs GBLC.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, GBLC.CN has a market cap of 1.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while GBLC.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas GBLC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to GBLC.CN's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GBLC.CN has daily volatility of 28.57.
TSF.CN vs PLNK.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, PLNK.CN has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while PLNK.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PLNK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to PLNK.CN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PLNK.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs EMPH.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, EMPH.CN has a market cap of 1.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while EMPH.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas EMPH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to EMPH.CN's ROE of +3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EMPH.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs PPK.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, PPK.CN has a market cap of 827971.00. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while PPK.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PPK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to PPK.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PPK.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs FDM.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, FDM.CN has a market cap of 821051.00. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while FDM.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas FDM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to FDM.CN's ROE of +12.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FDM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs PUSH.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, PUSH.CN has a market cap of 808440.00. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while PUSH.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas PUSH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to PUSH.CN's ROE of -10.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PUSH.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
TSF.CN vs TTT.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, TTT.CN has a market cap of 763470.00. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while TTT.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas TTT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to TTT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TTT.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs SOLV.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, SOLV.CN has a market cap of 762665.00. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while SOLV.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas SOLV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to SOLV.CN's ROE of -47.47%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SOLV.CN has daily volatility of 66.67.
TSF.CN vs GEMS.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, GEMS.CN has a market cap of 668958.00. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while GEMS.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas GEMS.CN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to GEMS.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GEMS.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs DVN.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, DVN.CN has a market cap of 604125.00. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while DVN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas DVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to DVN.CN's ROE of +3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and DVN.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs ARWY.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, ARWY.CN has a market cap of 539148.00. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while ARWY.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ARWY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to ARWY.CN's ROE of +5.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ARWY.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs XIGM.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, XIGM.CN has a market cap of 527063.00. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while XIGM.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas XIGM.CN's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to XIGM.CN's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and XIGM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs ZEU.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, ZEU.CN has a market cap of 410423.00. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while ZEU.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas ZEU.CN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to ZEU.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ZEU.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs COYX.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, COYX.CN has a market cap of 388425.00. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while COYX.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas COYX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to COYX.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and COYX.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.
TSF.CN vs RAD.CN Comparison
TSF.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSF.CN stands at N/A. In comparison, RAD.CN has a market cap of 139191.00. Regarding current trading prices, TSF.CN is priced at $0.08, while RAD.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.34, whereas RAD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TSF.CN's ROE is -1.51%, compared to RAD.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RAD.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.