Toray Industries, Inc.
Toray Industries, Inc. (TRYIF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRYIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRYIF | $6.36 | N/A | 9.3B | 26.50 | $0.24 | +1.94% |
| HNNMY | $3.60 | -0.55% | 145.8B | 22.50 | $0.16 | +3.92% |
| HMRZF | $19.40 | N/A | 31B | 23.66 | $0.82 | +3.62% |
| MONRF | $68.91 | -1.68% | 18.7B | 25.43 | $2.71 | +2.34% |
| MONRY | $62.67 | -3.10% | 17B | 23.12 | $2.71 | +2.29% |
| TRYIY | $14.15 | +1.29% | 10.5B | 29.48 | $0.48 | +1.23% |
| SZHIF | $6.78 | N/A | 10.2B | 10.93 | $0.62 | +5.02% |
| SHZHY | $6.35 | +4.79% | 9.5B | 11.14 | $0.57 | +5.29% |
| LPPSY | $20.41 | N/A | 7.6B | 18.39 | $1.11 | +4.99% |
| BSDGY | $27.06 | N/A | 6.2B | 11.92 | $2.27 | +6.72% |
Stock Comparison
TRYIF vs HNNMY Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HNNMY has a market cap of 145.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while HNNMY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas HNNMY's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HNNMY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to HNNMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check HNNMY's competition here
TRYIF vs HMRZF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HMRZF has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while HMRZF trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas HMRZF's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HMRZF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to HMRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check HMRZF's competition here
TRYIF vs MONRF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MONRF has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while MONRF trades at $68.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas MONRF's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MONRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to MONRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check MONRF's competition here
TRYIF vs MONRY Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MONRY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while MONRY trades at $62.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas MONRY's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MONRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to MONRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check MONRY's competition here
TRYIF vs TRYIY Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TRYIY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while TRYIY trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas TRYIY's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRYIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to TRYIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check TRYIY's competition here
TRYIF vs SZHIF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SZHIF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while SZHIF trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas SZHIF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SZHIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SZHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check SZHIF's competition here
TRYIF vs SHZHY Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SHZHY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while SHZHY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas SHZHY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHZHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SHZHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check SHZHY's competition here
TRYIF vs LPPSY Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LPPSY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while LPPSY trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas LPPSY's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LPPSY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to LPPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check LPPSY's competition here
TRYIF vs BSDGY Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BSDGY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while BSDGY trades at $27.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas BSDGY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSDGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to BSDGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check BSDGY's competition here
TRYIF vs BSDGF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BSDGF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while BSDGF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas BSDGF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSDGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to BSDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check BSDGF's competition here
TRYIF vs BOSSY Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BOSSY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while BOSSY trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas BOSSY's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BOSSY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to BOSSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check BOSSY's competition here
TRYIF vs CGGGF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CGGGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while CGGGF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas CGGGF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CGGGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to CGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check CGGGF's competition here
TRYIF vs DELTF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DELTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while DELTF trades at $54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas DELTF's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DELTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to DELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check DELTF's competition here
TRYIF vs WACLY Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WACLY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while WACLY trades at $143.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas WACLY's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WACLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to WACLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check WACLY's competition here
TRYIF vs SERNF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SERNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while SERNF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas SERNF's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SERNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SERNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check SERNF's competition here
TRYIF vs JNBYF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JNBYF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while JNBYF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas JNBYF's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JNBYF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to JNBYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check JNBYF's competition here
TRYIF vs WACLF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WACLF has a market cap of 740.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while WACLF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas WACLF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WACLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to WACLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check WACLF's competition here
TRYIF vs MKKOF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MKKOF has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while MKKOF trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas MKKOF's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MKKOF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to MKKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check MKKOF's competition here
TRYIF vs JWTXF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JWTXF has a market cap of 517.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while JWTXF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas JWTXF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JWTXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to JWTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check JWTXF's competition here
TRYIF vs TSIHF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TSIHF has a market cap of 479.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while TSIHF trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas TSIHF's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TSIHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to TSIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check TSIHF's competition here
TRYIF vs VDEVF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, VDEVF has a market cap of 443.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while VDEVF trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas VDEVF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VDEVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to VDEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check VDEVF's competition here
TRYIF vs CDGXF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CDGXF has a market cap of 293.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while CDGXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas CDGXF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDGXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to CDGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check CDGXF's competition here
TRYIF vs CDGXY Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CDGXY has a market cap of 290.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while CDGXY trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas CDGXY's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDGXY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to CDGXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check CDGXY's competition here
TRYIF vs WQTEF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WQTEF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while WQTEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas WQTEF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WQTEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to WQTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check WQTEF's competition here
TRYIF vs ECNLF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ECNLF has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while ECNLF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas ECNLF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ECNLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to ECNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check ECNLF's competition here
TRYIF vs IFABF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IFABF has a market cap of 95.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while IFABF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas IFABF's P/E ratio is 78.75. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IFABF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to IFABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check IFABF's competition here
TRYIF vs CHRLF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CHRLF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while CHRLF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas CHRLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to CHRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check CHRLF's competition here
TRYIF vs TFRFF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TFRFF has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while TFRFF trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas TFRFF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TFRFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to TFRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check TFRFF's competition here
TRYIF vs NLLGF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NLLGF has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while NLLGF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas NLLGF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NLLGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to NLLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check NLLGF's competition here
TRYIF vs TAPCF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TAPCF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while TAPCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas TAPCF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TAPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to TAPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check TAPCF's competition here
TRYIF vs USYNF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, USYNF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while USYNF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas USYNF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USYNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to USYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check USYNF's competition here
TRYIF vs TUGHF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TUGHF has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while TUGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas TUGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TUGHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to TUGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check TUGHF's competition here
TRYIF vs SEPGY Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SEPGY has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while SEPGY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas SEPGY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SEPGY's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SEPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check SEPGY's competition here
TRYIF vs TALN Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TALN has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while TALN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas TALN's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TALN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to TALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check TALN's competition here
TRYIF vs SEPGF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SEPGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while SEPGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas SEPGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SEPGF's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to SEPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check SEPGF's competition here
TRYIF vs AHRO Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AHRO has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while AHRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas AHRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AHRO's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to AHRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check AHRO's competition here
TRYIF vs JLMC Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JLMC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while JLMC trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas JLMC's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JLMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to JLMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check JLMC's competition here
TRYIF vs AGNY Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AGNY has a market cap of 978K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while AGNY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas AGNY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AGNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to AGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check AGNY's competition here
TRYIF vs SKFG Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SKFG has a market cap of 949.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while SKFG trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas SKFG's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SKFG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to SKFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check SKFG's competition here
TRYIF vs PBBSF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PBBSF has a market cap of 907.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while PBBSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas PBBSF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PBBSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to PBBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check PBBSF's competition here
TRYIF vs BLFR Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BLFR has a market cap of 695.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while BLFR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas BLFR's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLFR's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to BLFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check BLFR's competition here
TRYIF vs CGAC Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CGAC has a market cap of 371.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while CGAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas CGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CGAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to CGAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check CGAC's competition here
TRYIF vs RYPPF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RYPPF has a market cap of 297.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while RYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas RYPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RYPPF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to RYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check RYPPF's competition here
TRYIF vs SUUB Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SUUB has a market cap of 81.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while SUUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas SUUB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUUB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to SUUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check SUUB's competition here
TRYIF vs CIND Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CIND has a market cap of 57.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while CIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas CIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to CIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check CIND's competition here
TRYIF vs CRTL Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CRTL has a market cap of 26.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while CRTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas CRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to CRTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check CRTL's competition here
TRYIF vs OMVE Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OMVE has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while OMVE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas OMVE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OMVE's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to OMVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check OMVE's competition here
TRYIF vs LYJN Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LYJN has a market cap of 9.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while LYJN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas LYJN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LYJN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to LYJN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check LYJN's competition here
TRYIF vs TRUA Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, TRUA has a market cap of 7.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while TRUA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas TRUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRUA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to TRUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check TRUA's competition here
TRYIF vs EDSFF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, EDSFF has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while EDSFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas EDSFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EDSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to EDSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check EDSFF's competition here
TRYIF vs APPM Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, APPM has a market cap of 2.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while APPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas APPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APPM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to APPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check APPM's competition here
TRYIF vs AVLP Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AVLP has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while AVLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas AVLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVLP's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to AVLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check AVLP's competition here
TRYIF vs LZENF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LZENF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while LZENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas LZENF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LZENF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to LZENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check LZENF's competition here
TRYIF vs SSTU Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SSTU has a market cap of 897. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while SSTU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas SSTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to SSTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check SSTU's competition here
TRYIF vs IBGR Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, IBGR has a market cap of 234. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while IBGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas IBGR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IBGR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to IBGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check IBGR's competition here
TRYIF vs SUFF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SUFF has a market cap of 63. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while SUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas SUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check SUFF's competition here
TRYIF vs JKRO Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JKRO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while JKRO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas JKRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JKRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to JKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check JKRO's competition here
TRYIF vs WLFDY Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, WLFDY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while WLFDY trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas WLFDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WLFDY's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to WLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check WLFDY's competition here
TRYIF vs GLLHF Comparison April 2026
TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 9.3B. In comparison, GLLHF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $6.36, while GLLHF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas GLLHF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLLHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to GLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.Check GLLHF's competition here