Toray Industries, Inc.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, HNNMY has a market cap of 117.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while HNNMY trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas HNNMY's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HNNMY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to HNNMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, HMRZF has a market cap of 19.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while HMRZF trades at $12.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas HMRZF's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HMRZF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to HMRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, MONRY has a market cap of 16.78B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while MONRY trades at $61.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas MONRY's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MONRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to MONRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, MONRF has a market cap of 16.62B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while MONRF trades at $61.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas MONRF's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MONRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to MONRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 15.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while RL trades at $248.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, SZHIF has a market cap of 11.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while SZHIF trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas SZHIF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SZHIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SZHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, SHZHY has a market cap of 11.42B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while SHZHY trades at $7.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas SHZHY's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHZHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SHZHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, TRYIY has a market cap of 10.42B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while TRYIY trades at $13.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas TRYIY's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRYIY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to TRYIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 7.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while GIL trades at $47.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 6.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while LEVI trades at $17.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, BSDGY has a market cap of 5.96B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while BSDGY trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas BSDGY's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BSDGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to BSDGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, BSDGF has a market cap of 5.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while BSDGF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas BSDGF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BSDGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to BSDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while VFC trades at $13.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is -35.89. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VFC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, RYPPF has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while RYPPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas RYPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RYPPF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to RYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while PVH trades at $74.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while KTB trades at $68.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while COLM trades at $66.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, BOSSY has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while BOSSY trades at $8.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas BOSSY's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BOSSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to BOSSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while UAA trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -20.16. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while UA trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -19.24. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while ZGN trades at $8.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while AIN trades at $65.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, WACLY has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while WACLY trades at $169.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas WACLY's P/E ratio is 58.86. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WACLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to WACLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while HBI trades at $5.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is -18.16. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HBI's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, CGGGF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while CGGGF trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas CGGGF's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGGGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to CGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, DELTF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while DELTF trades at $50.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas DELTF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to DELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while GIII trades at $26.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, JNBYF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while JNBYF trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas JNBYF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JNBYF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to JNBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, SERNF has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while SERNF trades at $17.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas SERNF's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SERNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SERNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 850.44M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while GOOS trades at $8.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 802.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while FIGS trades at $4.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 247.00. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 799.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while OXM trades at $53.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OXM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, WACLF has a market cap of 791.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while WACLF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas WACLF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WACLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to WACLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, MKKOF has a market cap of 525.81M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while MKKOF trades at $12.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas MKKOF's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MKKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to MKKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, JWTXF has a market cap of 517.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while JWTXF trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas JWTXF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JWTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to JWTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, TSIHF has a market cap of 472.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while TSIHF trades at $7.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas TSIHF's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TSIHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to TSIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, VDEVF has a market cap of 441.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while VDEVF trades at $35.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas VDEVF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VDEVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to VDEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, CDGXF has a market cap of 351.87M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while CDGXF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas CDGXF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDGXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to CDGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, CDGXY has a market cap of 235.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while CDGXY trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas CDGXY's P/E ratio is -18.27. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDGXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to CDGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 170.87M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while SGC trades at $10.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, WQTEF has a market cap of 167.21M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while WQTEF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas WQTEF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WQTEF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to WQTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 162.26M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while LAKE trades at $17.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, ECNLF has a market cap of 112.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while ECNLF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas ECNLF's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ECNLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to ECNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, TFRFF has a market cap of 95.27M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while TFRFF trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas TFRFF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFRFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to TFRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 86.07M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while UFI trades at $4.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, CHRLF has a market cap of 84.09M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while CHRLF trades at $5.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas CHRLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to CHRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, NLLGF has a market cap of 66.98M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while NLLGF trades at $5.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas NLLGF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NLLGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to NLLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 50.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while CULP trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, TAPCF has a market cap of 42.44M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while TAPCF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas TAPCF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TAPCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to TAPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 39.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while JRSH trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is -10.47. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JRSH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, LPPSY has a market cap of 37.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while LPPSY trades at $20.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas LPPSY's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LPPSY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to LPPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 21.19M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while VNCE trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, IFABF has a market cap of 21.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while IFABF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas IFABF's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to IFABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, USYNF has a market cap of 16.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while USYNF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas USYNF's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USYNF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to USYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 14.17M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while PMNT trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, TUGHF has a market cap of 11.32M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while TUGHF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas TUGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TUGHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to TUGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 11.29M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while JL trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while LLL trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LLL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 9.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while DXYN trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to DXYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, SEPGY has a market cap of 8.33M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while SEPGY trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas SEPGY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SEPGY's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SEPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 7.32M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while NCI trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NCI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 5.91M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while XELB trades at $2.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, SEPGF has a market cap of 5.03M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while SEPGF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas SEPGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SEPGF's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to SEPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while JXJT trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, AVLP has a market cap of 4.87M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while AVLP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas AVLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVLP's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to AVLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, AHRO has a market cap of 4.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while AHRO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas AHRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHRO's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to AHRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while DLA trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, TALN has a market cap of 3.69M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while TALN trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas TALN's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TALN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to TALN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, CRTL has a market cap of 2.57M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while CRTL trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas CRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to CRTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, BLFR has a market cap of 2.55M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while BLFR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas BLFR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLFR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to BLFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, JLMC has a market cap of 1.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while JLMC trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas JLMC's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JLMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to JLMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, CGAC has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while CGAC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas CGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to CGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, PBBSF has a market cap of 907839.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while PBBSF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas PBBSF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PBBSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to PBBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, SKFG has a market cap of 507365.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while SKFG trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas SKFG's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SKFG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, SUUB has a market cap of 81212.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while SUUB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas SUUB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUUB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to SUUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, AGNY has a market cap of 72000.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while AGNY trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas AGNY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to AGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, CIND has a market cap of 57600.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while CIND trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas CIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to CIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, OMVE has a market cap of 15518.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while OMVE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas OMVE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OMVE's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to OMVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, LYJN has a market cap of 9903.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while LYJN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas LYJN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LYJN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to LYJN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, TRUA has a market cap of 6895.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while TRUA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas TRUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRUA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to TRUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, EDSFF has a market cap of 3314.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while EDSFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas EDSFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EDSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to EDSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, APPM has a market cap of 2750.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while APPM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas APPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APPM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to APPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, IBGR has a market cap of 2230.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while IBGR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas IBGR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IBGR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to IBGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, LZENF has a market cap of 1364.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while LZENF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas LZENF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LZENF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to LZENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, SSTU has a market cap of 897.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while SSTU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas SSTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to SSTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, SUFF has a market cap of 69.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while SUFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas SUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, KBSF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while KBSF trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas KBSF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KBSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to KBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, SQBG comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while SQBG trades at $6.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas SQBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SQBG's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to SQBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, EVK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while EVK trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, JKRO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while JKRO trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas JKRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JKRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to JKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, GLLHF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while GLLHF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas GLLHF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLLHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to GLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.

TRYIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRYIF stands at 8.80B. In comparison, WLFDY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRYIF is priced at $5.55, while WLFDY trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRYIF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.23, whereas WLFDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRYIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WLFDY's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TRYIF is more volatile compared to WLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRYIF.