TruGolf Holdings, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TRUG
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TRUG
TruGolf Holdings, Inc. (TRUG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRUG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRUG | $3.77 | -0.79% | 1.9M | -0.01 | -$373.60 | N/A |
| ATVI | $94.42 | -0.05% | 74.3B | 34.59 | $2.73 | +1.05% |
| NTES | $113.41 | +0.61% | 72.4B | 14.88 | $7.62 | +2.63% |
| RBLX | $57.66 | +3.72% | 40.9B | -37.45 | -$1.54 | N/A |
| BILI | $24.47 | +2.99% | 10.3B | 94.12 | $0.26 | N/A |
| PLTK | $3.20 | +2.24% | 1.2B | -5.93 | -$0.54 | +12.44% |
| AVID | $27.05 | +0.02% | 1.2B | 37.56 | $0.72 | N/A |
| MGRT | $49.24 | -0.12% | 664.1M | 254.21 | $0.19 | N/A |
| SCPL | $22.95 | +0.02% | 495.6M | 23.18 | $0.99 | N/A |
| SOHU | $14.75 | -1.80% | 443.5M | 1.06 | $13.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRUG vs ATVI Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ATVI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while ATVI trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATVI's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to ATVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to ATVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check ATVI's competition here
TRUG vs NTES Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NTES has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while NTES trades at $113.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NTES's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to NTES's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to NTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check NTES's competition here
TRUG vs RBLX Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RBLX has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while RBLX trades at $57.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RBLX's P/E ratio is -37.45. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to RBLX's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to RBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check RBLX's competition here
TRUG vs BILI Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while BILI trades at $24.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is 94.12. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to BILI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to BILI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check BILI's competition here
TRUG vs PLTK Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PLTK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while PLTK trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLTK's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to PLTK's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to PLTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check PLTK's competition here
TRUG vs AVID Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AVID has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while AVID trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AVID's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to AVID's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to AVID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check AVID's competition here
TRUG vs MGRT Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 664.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while MGRT trades at $49.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 254.21. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MGRT's competition here
TRUG vs SCPL Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SCPL has a market cap of 495.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while SCPL trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCPL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to SCPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SCPL's competition here
TRUG vs SOHU Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 443.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while SOHU trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to SOHU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SOHU's competition here
TRUG vs DDI Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DDI has a market cap of 440.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while DDI trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DDI's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to DDI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to DDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check DDI's competition here
TRUG vs GRVY Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GRVY has a market cap of 425.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while GRVY trades at $61.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GRVY's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to GRVY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GRVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GRVY's competition here
TRUG vs GDEV Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GDEV has a market cap of 274.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while GDEV trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GDEV's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to GDEV's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GDEV's competition here
TRUG vs GDC Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GDC has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while GDC trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GDC's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to GDC's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GDC's competition here
TRUG vs MRDN Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MRDN has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while MRDN trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MRDN's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to MRDN's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to MRDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MRDN's competition here
TRUG vs GCL Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GCL has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while GCL trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GCL's P/E ratio is 57.00. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to GCL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GCL's competition here
TRUG vs GMHS Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GMHS has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while GMHS trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GMHS's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to GMHS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GMHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GMHS's competition here
TRUG vs MYPS Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MYPS has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while MYPS trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MYPS's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to MYPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to MYPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MYPS's competition here
TRUG vs BRAG Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BRAG has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while BRAG trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRAG's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to BRAG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to BRAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check BRAG's competition here
TRUG vs SKLZ Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SKLZ has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while SKLZ trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SKLZ's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to SKLZ's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SKLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SKLZ's competition here
TRUG vs GAME Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GAME has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while GAME trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GAME's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to GAME's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GAME's competition here
TRUG vs NCTY Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while NCTY trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check NCTY's competition here
TRUG vs MSGM Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MSGM has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while MSGM trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MSGM's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to MSGM's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to MSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MSGM's competition here
TRUG vs GIGM Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GIGM has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while GIGM trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GIGM's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to GIGM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GIGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GIGM's competition here
TRUG vs SNAL Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SNAL has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while SNAL trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SNAL's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to SNAL's ROE of +3.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to SNAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SNAL's competition here
TRUG vs GXAI Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GXAI has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while GXAI trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GXAI's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to GXAI's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GXAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GXAI's competition here
TRUG vs GMGI Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GMGI has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while GMGI trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GMGI's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to GMGI's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GMGI's competition here
TRUG vs TBH Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TBH has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while TBH trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TBH's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to TBH's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to TBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check TBH's competition here
TRUG vs GCLWW Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GCLWW has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while GCLWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GCLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to GCLWW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GCLWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GCLWW's competition here
TRUG vs NFTG Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NFTG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while NFTG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NFTG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to NFTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to NFTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check NFTG's competition here
TRUG vs MGAM Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MGAM has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while MGAM trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MGAM's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to MGAM's ROE of -6.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to MGAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MGAM's competition here
TRUG vs MYPSW Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MYPSW has a market cap of 703.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while MYPSW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MYPSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to MYPSW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to MYPSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MYPSW's competition here
TRUG vs GDEVW Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GDEVW has a market cap of 132.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while GDEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GDEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to GDEVW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GDEVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GDEVW's competition here
TRUG vs BHAT Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BHAT has a market cap of 97.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while BHAT trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BHAT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to BHAT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to BHAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check BHAT's competition here
TRUG vs GGL Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GGL has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while GGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to GGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRUG has daily volatility of 7.21 and GGL has daily volatility of N/A.Check GGL's competition here
TRUG vs YVR Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, YVR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while YVR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YVR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to YVR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to YVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check YVR's competition here
TRUG vs ZNGA Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ZNGA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while ZNGA trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZNGA's P/E ratio is -98.55. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to ZNGA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to ZNGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check ZNGA's competition here
TRUG vs SCR Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while SCR trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to SCR's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SCR's competition here
TRUG vs CCNC Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CCNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while CCNC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to CCNC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to CCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check CCNC's competition here
TRUG vs HPY Comparison April 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $3.77, while HPY trades at $103.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -56.08%, compared to HPY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to HPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check HPY's competition here