TruGolf Holdings, Inc.
TruGolf Holdings, Inc. (TRUG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRUG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRUG | $2.47 | +9.29% | 1.3M | -0.05 | -$51.39 | N/A |
| ATVI | $94.42 | -0.05% | 74.3B | 34.59 | $2.73 | +1.05% |
| NTES | $116.25 | -1.47% | 74.2B | 15.16 | $7.67 | +2.56% |
| RBLX | $47.57 | +5.41% | 34.1B | -30.31 | -$1.57 | N/A |
| BILI | $21.69 | -1.18% | 9.1B | 51.63 | $0.42 | N/A |
| MGRT | $139.78 | +3.54% | 1.9B | 777.78 | $0.18 | N/A |
| PLTK | $3.65 | -1.88% | 1.4B | -6.64 | -$0.55 | +10.93% |
| AVID | $27.05 | +0.02% | 1.2B | 37.56 | $0.72 | N/A |
| DDI | $11.00 | +0.09% | 545.1M | 5.31 | $2.07 | N/A |
| SCPL | $22.95 | +0.02% | 495.6M | 23.18 | $0.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRUG vs ATVI Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ATVI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while ATVI trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ATVI's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to ATVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to ATVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check ATVI's competition here
TRUG vs NTES Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NTES has a market cap of 74.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while NTES trades at $116.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NTES's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to NTES's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to NTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check NTES's competition here
TRUG vs RBLX Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, RBLX has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while RBLX trades at $47.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RBLX's P/E ratio is -30.31. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to RBLX's ROE of -2.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to RBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check RBLX's competition here
TRUG vs BILI Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while BILI trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is 51.63. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to BILI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to BILI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check BILI's competition here
TRUG vs MGRT Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while MGRT trades at $139.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 777.78. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MGRT's competition here
TRUG vs PLTK Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, PLTK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while PLTK trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PLTK's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to PLTK's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to PLTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check PLTK's competition here
TRUG vs AVID Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, AVID has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while AVID trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AVID's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to AVID's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to AVID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check AVID's competition here
TRUG vs DDI Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, DDI has a market cap of 545.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while DDI trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DDI's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to DDI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to DDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check DDI's competition here
TRUG vs SCPL Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SCPL has a market cap of 495.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while SCPL trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCPL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to SCPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SCPL's competition here
TRUG vs SOHU Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 467.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while SOHU trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to SOHU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SOHU's competition here
TRUG vs GRVY Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GRVY has a market cap of 430.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while GRVY trades at $62.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GRVY's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to GRVY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GRVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GRVY's competition here
TRUG vs GDC Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GDC has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while GDC trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GDC's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to GDC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GDC's competition here
TRUG vs GDEV Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GDEV has a market cap of 281.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while GDEV trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GDEV's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to GDEV's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GDEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GDEV's competition here
TRUG vs MRDN Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MRDN has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while MRDN trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MRDN's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to MRDN's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to MRDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MRDN's competition here
TRUG vs SKLZ Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SKLZ has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while SKLZ trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SKLZ's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to SKLZ's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to SKLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SKLZ's competition here
TRUG vs GCL Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GCL has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while GCL trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GCL's P/E ratio is 50.99. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to GCL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GCL's competition here
TRUG vs GMHS Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GMHS has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while GMHS trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GMHS's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to GMHS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GMHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GMHS's competition here
TRUG vs BRAG Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BRAG has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while BRAG trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRAG's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to BRAG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to BRAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check BRAG's competition here
TRUG vs MYPS Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MYPS has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while MYPS trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MYPS's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to MYPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to MYPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MYPS's competition here
TRUG vs GAME Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GAME has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while GAME trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GAME's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to GAME's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GAME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GAME's competition here
TRUG vs NCTY Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while NCTY trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -7.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check NCTY's competition here
TRUG vs MSGM Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MSGM has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while MSGM trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MSGM's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to MSGM's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to MSGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MSGM's competition here
TRUG vs SNAL Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SNAL has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while SNAL trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SNAL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to SNAL's ROE of +3.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SNAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SNAL's competition here
TRUG vs GIGM Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GIGM has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while GIGM trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GIGM's P/E ratio is -10.11. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to GIGM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GIGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GIGM's competition here
TRUG vs GXAI Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GXAI has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while GXAI trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GXAI's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to GXAI's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GXAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GXAI's competition here
TRUG vs GMGI Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GMGI has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while GMGI trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GMGI's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to GMGI's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GMGI's competition here
TRUG vs TBH Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, TBH has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while TBH trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TBH's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to TBH's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to TBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check TBH's competition here
TRUG vs NFTG Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, NFTG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while NFTG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NFTG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to NFTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to NFTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check NFTG's competition here
TRUG vs GCLWW Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GCLWW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while GCLWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GCLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to GCLWW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GCLWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GCLWW's competition here
TRUG vs MGAM Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MGAM has a market cap of 619.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while MGAM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MGAM's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to MGAM's ROE of -6.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to MGAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MGAM's competition here
TRUG vs MYPSW Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, MYPSW has a market cap of 389.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while MYPSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MYPSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to MYPSW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to MYPSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MYPSW's competition here
TRUG vs GDEVW Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GDEVW has a market cap of 134.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while GDEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GDEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to GDEVW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GDEVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GDEVW's competition here
TRUG vs BHAT Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, BHAT has a market cap of 97.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while BHAT trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BHAT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to BHAT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to BHAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check BHAT's competition here
TRUG vs GGL Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, GGL has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while GGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to GGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRUG has daily volatility of 14.19 and GGL has daily volatility of N/A.Check GGL's competition here
TRUG vs HPY Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, HPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while HPY trades at $103.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to HPY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to HPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check HPY's competition here
TRUG vs CCNC Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, CCNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while CCNC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CCNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to CCNC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to CCNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check CCNC's competition here
TRUG vs SCR Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, SCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while SCR trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to SCR's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SCR's competition here
TRUG vs ZNGA Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, ZNGA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while ZNGA trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ZNGA's P/E ratio is -98.55. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to ZNGA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to ZNGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check ZNGA's competition here
TRUG vs YVR Comparison May 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 1.3M. In comparison, YVR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $2.47, while YVR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas YVR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -5.91%, compared to YVR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to YVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check YVR's competition here