Taylormade Renewables Limited
Taylormade Renewables Limited (TRL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRL.BO | ₹99.30 | -0.10% | 1.2B | 29.64 | ₹3.35 | N/A |
| ULTRACEMCO.BO | ₹11,691.55 | +0.56% | 3.4T | 42.08 | ₹277.87 | +0.66% |
| ULTRACEMCO.NS | ₹11,689.00 | +0.57% | 3.4T | 42.08 | ₹277.79 | +0.66% |
| GRASIM.BO | ₹3,169.45 | +0.16% | 2.2T | 49.73 | ₹63.73 | +0.32% |
| GRASIM.NS | ₹3,170.00 | +0.16% | 2.1T | 43.31 | ₹73.20 | +0.32% |
| AMBUJACEM.BO | ₹460.05 | +2.28% | 1.1T | 30.71 | ₹14.98 | +0.44% |
| AMBUJACEM.NS | ₹459.75 | +2.23% | 1.1T | 24.11 | ₹19.07 | +0.44% |
| SHREECEM.NS | ₹25,400.00 | +0.87% | 916.5B | 52.55 | ₹483.31 | +0.55% |
| SHREECEM.BO | ₹25,382.00 | +0.65% | 915.8B | 53.31 | ₹476.14 | +0.55% |
| JKCEMENT.BO | ₹5,305.85 | -0.10% | 410B | 41.33 | ₹128.38 | +0.28% |
Stock Comparison
TRL.BO vs ULTRACEMCO.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ULTRACEMCO.BO has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ULTRACEMCO.BO trades at ₹11,691.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ULTRACEMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 42.08. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ULTRACEMCO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to ULTRACEMCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ULTRACEMCO.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs ULTRACEMCO.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ULTRACEMCO.NS has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ULTRACEMCO.NS trades at ₹11,689.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ULTRACEMCO.NS's P/E ratio is 42.08. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ULTRACEMCO.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to ULTRACEMCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ULTRACEMCO.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs GRASIM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GRASIM.BO has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while GRASIM.BO trades at ₹3,169.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas GRASIM.BO's P/E ratio is 49.73. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRASIM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to GRASIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check GRASIM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs GRASIM.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GRASIM.NS has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while GRASIM.NS trades at ₹3,170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas GRASIM.NS's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRASIM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to GRASIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check GRASIM.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs AMBUJACEM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMBUJACEM.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while AMBUJACEM.BO trades at ₹460.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas AMBUJACEM.BO's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMBUJACEM.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to AMBUJACEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check AMBUJACEM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs AMBUJACEM.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMBUJACEM.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while AMBUJACEM.NS trades at ₹459.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas AMBUJACEM.NS's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMBUJACEM.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to AMBUJACEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check AMBUJACEM.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs SHREECEM.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHREECEM.NS has a market cap of 916.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SHREECEM.NS trades at ₹25,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SHREECEM.NS's P/E ratio is 52.55. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHREECEM.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to SHREECEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SHREECEM.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs SHREECEM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHREECEM.BO has a market cap of 915.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SHREECEM.BO trades at ₹25,382.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SHREECEM.BO's P/E ratio is 53.31. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHREECEM.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to SHREECEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SHREECEM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs JKCEMENT.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JKCEMENT.BO has a market cap of 410B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while JKCEMENT.BO trades at ₹5,305.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas JKCEMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 41.33. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JKCEMENT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to JKCEMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check JKCEMENT.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs JKCEMENT.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JKCEMENT.NS has a market cap of 409.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while JKCEMENT.NS trades at ₹5,301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas JKCEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is 41.28. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JKCEMENT.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to JKCEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check JKCEMENT.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs DALBHARAT.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DALBHARAT.BO has a market cap of 336.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while DALBHARAT.BO trades at ₹1,792.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas DALBHARAT.BO's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DALBHARAT.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to DALBHARAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check DALBHARAT.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs DALBHARAT.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DALBHARAT.NS has a market cap of 336.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while DALBHARAT.NS trades at ₹1,792.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas DALBHARAT.NS's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DALBHARAT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to DALBHARAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check DALBHARAT.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs ACC.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ACC.BO has a market cap of 268.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ACC.BO trades at ₹1,427.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ACC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to ACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ACC.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs ACC.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ACC.NS has a market cap of 267.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ACC.NS trades at ₹1,426.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ACC.NS's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to ACC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ACC.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs RAMCOCEM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RAMCOCEM.BO has a market cap of 209.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while RAMCOCEM.BO trades at ₹886.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas RAMCOCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMCOCEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to RAMCOCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check RAMCOCEM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs RAMCOCEM.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RAMCOCEM.NS has a market cap of 209.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while RAMCOCEM.NS trades at ₹886.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas RAMCOCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMCOCEM.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to RAMCOCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check RAMCOCEM.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs JSWCEMENT.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JSWCEMENT.BO has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while JSWCEMENT.BO trades at ₹130.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas JSWCEMENT.BO's P/E ratio is -21.12. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JSWCEMENT.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to JSWCEMENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check JSWCEMENT.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs JSWCEMENT.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JSWCEMENT.NS has a market cap of 175.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while JSWCEMENT.NS trades at ₹130.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas JSWCEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is -21.12. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JSWCEMENT.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to JSWCEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check JSWCEMENT.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs INDIACEM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INDIACEM.BO has a market cap of 124.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while INDIACEM.BO trades at ₹400.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas INDIACEM.BO's P/E ratio is -183.83. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDIACEM.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to INDIACEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check INDIACEM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs INDIACEM.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INDIACEM.NS has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while INDIACEM.NS trades at ₹400.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas INDIACEM.NS's P/E ratio is -183.76. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDIACEM.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to INDIACEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check INDIACEM.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs NUVOCO.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NUVOCO.NS has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while NUVOCO.NS trades at ₹331.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas NUVOCO.NS's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NUVOCO.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to NUVOCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check NUVOCO.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs NUVOCO.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NUVOCO.BO has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while NUVOCO.BO trades at ₹331.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas NUVOCO.BO's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NUVOCO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to NUVOCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check NUVOCO.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs STARCEMENT.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STARCEMENT.BO has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while STARCEMENT.BO trades at ₹216.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas STARCEMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STARCEMENT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to STARCEMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check STARCEMENT.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs STARCEMENT.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STARCEMENT.NS has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while STARCEMENT.NS trades at ₹216.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas STARCEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STARCEMENT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to STARCEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check STARCEMENT.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs BIRLACORPN.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BIRLACORPN.NS has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while BIRLACORPN.NS trades at ₹1,006.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas BIRLACORPN.NS's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIRLACORPN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to BIRLACORPN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check BIRLACORPN.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs BIRLACORPN.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BIRLACORPN.BO has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while BIRLACORPN.BO trades at ₹1,006.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas BIRLACORPN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIRLACORPN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to BIRLACORPN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check BIRLACORPN.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs JKLAKSHMI.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JKLAKSHMI.BO has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while JKLAKSHMI.BO trades at ₹604.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas JKLAKSHMI.BO's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JKLAKSHMI.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to JKLAKSHMI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check JKLAKSHMI.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs JKLAKSHMI.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JKLAKSHMI.NS has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while JKLAKSHMI.NS trades at ₹604.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas JKLAKSHMI.NS's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JKLAKSHMI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to JKLAKSHMI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check JKLAKSHMI.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs PRSMJOHNSN.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRSMJOHNSN.BO has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while PRSMJOHNSN.BO trades at ₹121.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas PRSMJOHNSN.BO's P/E ratio is 83.86. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRSMJOHNSN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to PRSMJOHNSN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check PRSMJOHNSN.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs PRSMJOHNSN.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRSMJOHNSN.NS has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while PRSMJOHNSN.NS trades at ₹121.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas PRSMJOHNSN.NS's P/E ratio is 83.85. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRSMJOHNSN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to PRSMJOHNSN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check PRSMJOHNSN.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs HEIDELBERG.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HEIDELBERG.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while HEIDELBERG.BO trades at ₹159.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas HEIDELBERG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HEIDELBERG.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to HEIDELBERG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check HEIDELBERG.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs HEIDELBERG.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HEIDELBERG.NS has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while HEIDELBERG.NS trades at ₹158.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas HEIDELBERG.NS's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HEIDELBERG.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to HEIDELBERG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check HEIDELBERG.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs ORIENTCEM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ORIENTCEM.BO has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ORIENTCEM.BO trades at ₹143.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ORIENTCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORIENTCEM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to ORIENTCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ORIENTCEM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs ORIENTCEM.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ORIENTCEM.NS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ORIENTCEM.NS trades at ₹143.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ORIENTCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORIENTCEM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTCEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ORIENTCEM.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs SAGCEM.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SAGCEM.NS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SAGCEM.NS trades at ₹181.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SAGCEM.NS's P/E ratio is -3633.80. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAGCEM.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to SAGCEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SAGCEM.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs SAGCEM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SAGCEM.BO has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SAGCEM.BO trades at ₹181.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SAGCEM.BO's P/E ratio is -14.21. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAGCEM.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to SAGCEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SAGCEM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs MANGLMCEM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MANGLMCEM.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while MANGLMCEM.BO trades at ₹849.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas MANGLMCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MANGLMCEM.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to MANGLMCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check MANGLMCEM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs MANGLMCEM.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MANGLMCEM.NS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while MANGLMCEM.NS trades at ₹849.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas MANGLMCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MANGLMCEM.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to MANGLMCEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check MANGLMCEM.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs EPACK.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPACK.NS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while EPACK.NS trades at ₹230.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas EPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 54.21. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPACK.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to EPACK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check EPACK.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs KCP.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KCP.BO has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while KCP.BO trades at ₹162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas KCP.BO's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KCP.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to KCP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check KCP.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs KCP.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KCP.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while KCP.NS trades at ₹161.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas KCP.NS's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KCP.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to KCP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check KCP.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs UDAICEMENT.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UDAICEMENT.NS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while UDAICEMENT.NS trades at ₹36.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas UDAICEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is 201.28. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UDAICEMENT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to UDAICEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check UDAICEMENT.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs UDAICEMENT.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UDAICEMENT.BO has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while UDAICEMENT.BO trades at ₹36.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas UDAICEMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 201.06. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UDAICEMENT.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to UDAICEMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check UDAICEMENT.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs SANGHIIND.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SANGHIIND.BO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SANGHIIND.BO trades at ₹50.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SANGHIIND.BO's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SANGHIIND.BO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to SANGHIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SANGHIIND.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs SANGHIIND.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SANGHIIND.NS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SANGHIIND.NS trades at ₹49.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SANGHIIND.NS's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SANGHIIND.NS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to SANGHIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SANGHIIND.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs IFGLEXPOR.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IFGLEXPOR.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while IFGLEXPOR.BO trades at ₹173.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas IFGLEXPOR.BO's P/E ratio is 43.55. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IFGLEXPOR.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to IFGLEXPOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check IFGLEXPOR.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs IFGLEXPOR.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IFGLEXPOR.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while IFGLEXPOR.NS trades at ₹173.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas IFGLEXPOR.NS's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IFGLEXPOR.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to IFGLEXPOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check IFGLEXPOR.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs SHREDIGCEM.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHREDIGCEM.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SHREDIGCEM.NS trades at ₹71.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SHREDIGCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHREDIGCEM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to SHREDIGCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SHREDIGCEM.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs ORIRAIL.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ORIRAIL.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ORIRAIL.BO trades at ₹158.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ORIRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORIRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to ORIRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ORIRAIL.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs SHREDIGCEM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHREDIGCEM.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SHREDIGCEM.BO trades at ₹71.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SHREDIGCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHREDIGCEM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to SHREDIGCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SHREDIGCEM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs APOLLOPIPES.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, APOLLOPIPES.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while APOLLOPIPES.BO trades at ₹686.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas APOLLOPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 46.89. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APOLLOPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to APOLLOPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check APOLLOPIPES.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs DECCANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DECCANCE.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while DECCANCE.NS trades at ₹619.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas DECCANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DECCANCE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to DECCANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check DECCANCE.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs DECCANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DECCANCE.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while DECCANCE.BO trades at ₹624.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas DECCANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DECCANCE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to DECCANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check DECCANCE.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs NCLIND.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NCLIND.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while NCLIND.NS trades at ₹171.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas NCLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCLIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to NCLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check NCLIND.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs NCLIND.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NCLIND.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while NCLIND.BO trades at ₹170.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas NCLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCLIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to NCLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check NCLIND.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs SAURASHCEM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SAURASHCEM.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SAURASHCEM.BO trades at ₹61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SAURASHCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 46.94. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAURASHCEM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to SAURASHCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SAURASHCEM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs SAURASHCEM.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SAURASHCEM.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SAURASHCEM.NS trades at ₹60.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SAURASHCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 46.78. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAURASHCEM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to SAURASHCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SAURASHCEM.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs ACL.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ACL.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ACL.BO trades at ₹56.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ACL.BO's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACL.BO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to ACL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ACL.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs ACL.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ACL.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ACL.NS trades at ₹56.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ACL.NS's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACL.NS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to ACL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ACL.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs SHIVACEM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHIVACEM.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SHIVACEM.BO trades at ₹17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SHIVACEM.BO's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHIVACEM.BO's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to SHIVACEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SHIVACEM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs ZODIAC.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZODIAC.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ZODIAC.BO trades at ₹302.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ZODIAC.BO's P/E ratio is -71.89. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZODIAC.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to ZODIAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ZODIAC.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs ZODIAC.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZODIAC.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ZODIAC.NS trades at ₹300.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ZODIAC.NS's P/E ratio is 80.55. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZODIAC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to ZODIAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ZODIAC.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs VISHNUINFR.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VISHNUINFR.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while VISHNUINFR.NS trades at ₹173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas VISHNUINFR.NS's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VISHNUINFR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to VISHNUINFR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check VISHNUINFR.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs KESORAMIND.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KESORAMIND.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while KESORAMIND.NS trades at ₹13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas KESORAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KESORAMIND.NS's ROE of +18.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to KESORAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check KESORAMIND.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs KESORAMIND.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KESORAMIND.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while KESORAMIND.BO trades at ₹13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas KESORAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KESORAMIND.BO's ROE of +18.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to KESORAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check KESORAMIND.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs APCL.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, APCL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while APCL.NS trades at ₹124.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas APCL.NS's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APCL.NS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to APCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check APCL.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs APCL.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, APCL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while APCL.BO trades at ₹124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas APCL.BO's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APCL.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to APCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check APCL.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs NAVKAR.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NAVKAR.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while NAVKAR.BO trades at ₹14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas NAVKAR.BO's P/E ratio is 145.10. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAVKAR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to NAVKAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check NAVKAR.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs SAHYADRI.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SAHYADRI.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SAHYADRI.BO trades at ₹283.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SAHYADRI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAHYADRI.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to SAHYADRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SAHYADRI.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs SAHYADRI.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SAHYADRI.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SAHYADRI.NS trades at ₹279.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SAHYADRI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAHYADRI.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to SAHYADRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SAHYADRI.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs GSCLCEMENT.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GSCLCEMENT.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while GSCLCEMENT.NS trades at ₹33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas GSCLCEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is -87.37. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSCLCEMENT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to GSCLCEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check GSCLCEMENT.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs SKCIL.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SKCIL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while SKCIL.BO trades at ₹155.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas SKCIL.BO's P/E ratio is -231.42. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKCIL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to SKCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check SKCIL.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs GSLSU.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GSLSU.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while GSLSU.BO trades at ₹54.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas GSLSU.BO's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSLSU.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to GSLSU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check GSLSU.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs GSLSU.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GSLSU.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while GSLSU.NS trades at ₹54.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas GSLSU.NS's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSLSU.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to GSLSU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check GSLSU.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs ASIIL.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASIIL.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ASIIL.BO trades at ₹24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ASIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASIIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to ASIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ASIIL.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs BRPL.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BRPL.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while BRPL.BO trades at ₹126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas BRPL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRPL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to BRPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check BRPL.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs KEIL.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KEIL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while KEIL.BO trades at ₹15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas KEIL.BO's P/E ratio is -1519.00. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to KEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check KEIL.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs ALUWIND.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALUWIND.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ALUWIND.NS trades at ₹50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ALUWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALUWIND.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to ALUWIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ALUWIND.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs RISHILASE.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RISHILASE.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while RISHILASE.BO trades at ₹129.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas RISHILASE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RISHILASE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to RISHILASE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check RISHILASE.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs GLITTEKG.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GLITTEKG.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while GLITTEKG.BO trades at ₹41.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas GLITTEKG.BO's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLITTEKG.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to GLITTEKG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check GLITTEKG.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs NAVKARURB.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NAVKARURB.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while NAVKARURB.BO trades at ₹0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas NAVKARURB.BO's P/E ratio is -13.43. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAVKARURB.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to NAVKARURB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check NAVKARURB.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs NAVKARURB.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NAVKARURB.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while NAVKARURB.NS trades at ₹0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas NAVKARURB.NS's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAVKARURB.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to NAVKARURB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check NAVKARURB.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs PACIFICI.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PACIFICI.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while PACIFICI.BO trades at ₹146.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas PACIFICI.BO's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PACIFICI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to PACIFICI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check PACIFICI.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs KAKATCEM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KAKATCEM.BO has a market cap of 971.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while KAKATCEM.BO trades at ₹125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas KAKATCEM.BO's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAKATCEM.BO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to KAKATCEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check KAKATCEM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs KAKATCEM.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KAKATCEM.NS has a market cap of 964M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while KAKATCEM.NS trades at ₹124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas KAKATCEM.NS's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAKATCEM.NS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to KAKATCEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check KAKATCEM.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs BVCL.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BVCL.BO has a market cap of 949.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while BVCL.BO trades at ₹42.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas BVCL.BO's P/E ratio is 4284.00. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BVCL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to BVCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check BVCL.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs PANCM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PANCM.BO has a market cap of 941.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while PANCM.BO trades at ₹117.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas PANCM.BO's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PANCM.BO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to PANCM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check PANCM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs BVCL.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BVCL.NS has a market cap of 932.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while BVCL.NS trades at ₹42.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas BVCL.NS's P/E ratio is 4207.00. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BVCL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to BVCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check BVCL.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs NILACHAL.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NILACHAL.BO has a market cap of 875.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while NILACHAL.BO trades at ₹43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas NILACHAL.BO's P/E ratio is -18.07. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NILACHAL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to NILACHAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check NILACHAL.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs REFRACTORY.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, REFRACTORY.NS has a market cap of 732.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while REFRACTORY.NS trades at ₹33.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas REFRACTORY.NS's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REFRACTORY.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is more volatile compared to REFRACTORY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check REFRACTORY.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs RESTILE.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RESTILE.BO has a market cap of 705.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while RESTILE.BO trades at ₹7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas RESTILE.BO's P/E ratio is -102.57. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RESTILE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to RESTILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check RESTILE.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs ELEMARB.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELEMARB.BO has a market cap of 684.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while ELEMARB.BO trades at ₹187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas ELEMARB.BO's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELEMARB.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to ELEMARB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check ELEMARB.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs CEETAIN.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CEETAIN.BO has a market cap of 674.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while CEETAIN.BO trades at ₹46.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas CEETAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 186.08. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEETAIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to CEETAIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check CEETAIN.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs AHMDSTE.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AHMDSTE.BO has a market cap of 668.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while AHMDSTE.BO trades at ₹163.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas AHMDSTE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AHMDSTE.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to AHMDSTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check AHMDSTE.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs RALEGRA.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RALEGRA.BO has a market cap of 615.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while RALEGRA.BO trades at ₹58.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas RALEGRA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RALEGRA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to RALEGRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check RALEGRA.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs EFORCE.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EFORCE.NS has a market cap of 578M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while EFORCE.NS trades at ₹24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas EFORCE.NS's P/E ratio is 44.91. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EFORCE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to EFORCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check EFORCE.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs BURNPUR.NS Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BURNPUR.NS has a market cap of 568.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while BURNPUR.NS trades at ₹33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas BURNPUR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BURNPUR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to BURNPUR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check BURNPUR.NS's competition here
TRL.BO vs BHEEMACEM.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BHEEMACEM.BO has a market cap of 526.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while BHEEMACEM.BO trades at ₹16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas BHEEMACEM.BO's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHEEMACEM.BO's ROE of -5.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to BHEEMACEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check BHEEMACEM.BO's competition here
TRL.BO vs DIVSHKT.BO Comparison May 2026
TRL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRL.BO stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DIVSHKT.BO has a market cap of 489.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRL.BO is priced at ₹99.30, while DIVSHKT.BO trades at ₹47.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.64, whereas DIVSHKT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, TRL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIVSHKT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRL.BO is less volatile compared to DIVSHKT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRL.BO.Check DIVSHKT.BO's competition here