Trees Corporation (NEO: TREE.NE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Trees Corporation (NEO: TREE.NE) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE.NE stands at 1M. In comparison, LLY.TO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.NE is priced at CA$0.01 on the NEO, while LLY.TO trades at CA$42.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LLY.TO's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, TREE.NE's ROE is -4.86%, compared to LLY.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.NE is less volatile compared to LLY.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.NE.Check LLY.TO's competition here

Trees Corporation (NEO: TREE.NE) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE.NE stands at 1M. In comparison, NBLY.TO has a market cap of 835.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.NE is priced at CA$0.01 on the NEO, while NBLY.TO trades at CA$18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NBLY.TO's P/E ratio is -25.48. In terms of profitability, TREE.NE's ROE is -4.86%, compared to NBLY.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.NE is less volatile compared to NBLY.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.NE.Check NBLY.TO's competition here

Trees Corporation (NEO: TREE.NE) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE.NE stands at 1M. In comparison, CYBN.NE has a market cap of 256.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.NE is priced at CA$0.01 on the NEO, while CYBN.NE trades at CA$10.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CYBN.NE's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, TREE.NE's ROE is -4.86%, compared to CYBN.NE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.NE is less volatile compared to CYBN.NE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.NE.Check CYBN.NE's competition here

Trees Corporation (NEO: TREE.NE) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE.NE stands at 1M. In comparison, MDP.TO has a market cap of 159.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.NE is priced at CA$0.01 on the NEO, while MDP.TO trades at CA$5.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MDP.TO's P/E ratio is -53.31. In terms of profitability, TREE.NE's ROE is -4.86%, compared to MDP.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.NE is less volatile compared to MDP.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.NE.Check MDP.TO's competition here

Trees Corporation (NEO: TREE.NE) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE.NE stands at 1M. In comparison, NOVC.TO has a market cap of 108M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.NE is priced at CA$0.01 on the NEO, while NOVC.TO trades at CA$1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NOVC.TO's P/E ratio is 34.80. In terms of profitability, TREE.NE's ROE is -4.86%, compared to NOVC.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.NE is similarly volatile compared to NOVC.TO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.NE.Check NOVC.TO's competition here

Trees Corporation (NEO: TREE.NE) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE.NE stands at 1M. In comparison, CBST.NE has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.NE is priced at CA$0.01 on the NEO, while CBST.NE trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CBST.NE's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TREE.NE's ROE is -4.86%, compared to CBST.NE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.NE is similarly volatile compared to CBST.NE. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.NE.Check CBST.NE's competition here

Trees Corporation (NEO: TREE.NE) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE.NE stands at 1M. In comparison, FAF.TO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.NE is priced at CA$0.01 on the NEO, while FAF.TO trades at CA$0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FAF.TO's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TREE.NE's ROE is -4.86%, compared to FAF.TO's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.NE is less volatile compared to FAF.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.NE.Check FAF.TO's competition here

Trees Corporation (NEO: TREE.NE) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE.NE stands at 1M. In comparison, GABY.CN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.NE is priced at CA$0.01 on the NEO, while GABY.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GABY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TREE.NE's ROE is -4.86%, compared to GABY.CN's ROE of +3.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.NE is similarly volatile compared to GABY.CN. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.NE.Check GABY.CN's competition here

Trees Corporation (NEO: TREE.NE) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE.NE stands at 1M. In comparison, CSCI.TO has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.NE is priced at CA$0.01 on the NEO, while CSCI.TO trades at CA$7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CSCI.TO's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TREE.NE's ROE is -4.86%, compared to CSCI.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.NE is less volatile compared to CSCI.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.NE.Check CSCI.TO's competition here

Trees Corporation (NEO: TREE.NE) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE.NE stands at 1M. In comparison, IWIN.CN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.NE is priced at CA$0.01 on the NEO, while IWIN.CN trades at CA$0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas IWIN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TREE.NE's ROE is -4.86%, compared to IWIN.CN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.NE is similarly volatile compared to IWIN.CN. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.NE.Check IWIN.CN's competition here

Trees Corporation (NEO: TREE.NE) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE.NE stands at 1M. In comparison, MOOD.CN has a market cap of 877.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TREE.NE is priced at CA$0.01 on the NEO, while MOOD.CN trades at CA$0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MOOD.CN's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, TREE.NE's ROE is -4.86%, compared to MOOD.CN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE.NE is less volatile compared to MOOD.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.NE.Check MOOD.CN's competition here