Transworld Shipping Lines Limited
Transworld Shipping Lines Limited (TRANSWORLD.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRANSWORLD.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRANSWORLD.BO | ₹115.85 | -6.19% | 2.5B | -5.60 | -₹20.67 | +1.29% |
| ADANIPORTS.BO | ₹1,313.40 | -1.81% | 3T | 22.73 | ₹57.78 | +0.53% |
| ADANIPORTS.NS | ₹1,312.60 | -1.88% | 3T | 22.71 | ₹57.79 | +0.53% |
| GESHIP.NS | ₹1,414.70 | -0.02% | 202B | 8.95 | ₹158.06 | +1.97% |
| GESHIP.BO | ₹1,413.60 | -0.08% | 201.8B | 8.95 | ₹158.03 | +1.97% |
| SCI.BO | ₹219.80 | -3.85% | 102.4B | 9.04 | ₹24.32 | +5.80% |
| SCI.NS | ₹219.70 | -4.00% | 102.3B | 9.03 | ₹24.33 | +5.80% |
| GPPL.BO | ₹142.45 | -2.16% | 68.9B | 14.20 | ₹10.03 | +6.74% |
| GPPL.NS | ₹142.39 | -2.24% | 68.8B | 14.18 | ₹10.04 | +6.74% |
| SHREEJISPG.NS | ₹323.50 | -4.99% | 52.7B | 33.01 | ₹9.80 | +0.28% |
Stock Comparison
TRANSWORLD.BO vs ADANIPORTS.BO Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ADANIPORTS.BO has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while ADANIPORTS.BO trades at ₹1,313.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas ADANIPORTS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ADANIPORTS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIPORTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check ADANIPORTS.BO's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs ADANIPORTS.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ADANIPORTS.NS has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while ADANIPORTS.NS trades at ₹1,312.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas ADANIPORTS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ADANIPORTS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIPORTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check ADANIPORTS.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs GESHIP.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GESHIP.NS has a market cap of 202B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while GESHIP.NS trades at ₹1,414.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas GESHIP.NS's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GESHIP.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to GESHIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check GESHIP.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs GESHIP.BO Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GESHIP.BO has a market cap of 201.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while GESHIP.BO trades at ₹1,413.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas GESHIP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GESHIP.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to GESHIP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check GESHIP.BO's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs SCI.BO Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SCI.BO has a market cap of 102.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while SCI.BO trades at ₹219.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas SCI.BO's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SCI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to SCI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check SCI.BO's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs SCI.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SCI.NS has a market cap of 102.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while SCI.NS trades at ₹219.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas SCI.NS's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SCI.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to SCI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check SCI.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs GPPL.BO Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GPPL.BO has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while GPPL.BO trades at ₹142.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas GPPL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GPPL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to GPPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check GPPL.BO's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs GPPL.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GPPL.NS has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while GPPL.NS trades at ₹142.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas GPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GPPL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to GPPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check GPPL.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs SHREEJISPG.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHREEJISPG.NS has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while SHREEJISPG.NS trades at ₹323.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas SHREEJISPG.NS's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SHREEJISPG.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to SHREEJISPG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check SHREEJISPG.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs SEAMECLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SEAMECLTD.BO has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while SEAMECLTD.BO trades at ₹1,409.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas SEAMECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SEAMECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to SEAMECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check SEAMECLTD.BO's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs SEAMECLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SEAMECLTD.NS has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while SEAMECLTD.NS trades at ₹1,408.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas SEAMECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SEAMECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to SEAMECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check SEAMECLTD.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs MARINE.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MARINE.NS has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while MARINE.NS trades at ₹151.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas MARINE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.15. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MARINE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to MARINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check MARINE.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs KMEW.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KMEW.NS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while KMEW.NS trades at ₹1,466.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas KMEW.NS's P/E ratio is 52.38. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KMEW.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to KMEW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check KMEW.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs ORICON.BO Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ORICON.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while ORICON.BO trades at ₹40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas ORICON.BO's P/E ratio is -52.92. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ORICON.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to ORICON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check ORICON.BO's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs SHREYAS.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHREYAS.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while SHREYAS.NS trades at ₹284.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas SHREYAS.NS's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SHREYAS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to SHREYAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check SHREYAS.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs SHREYAS.BO Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHREYAS.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while SHREYAS.BO trades at ₹282.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas SHREYAS.BO's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SHREYAS.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to SHREYAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check SHREYAS.BO's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs ESSARSHPNG.BO Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ESSARSHPNG.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while ESSARSHPNG.BO trades at ₹21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas ESSARSHPNG.BO's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ESSARSHPNG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to ESSARSHPNG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check ESSARSHPNG.BO's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs ESSARSHPNG.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ESSARSHPNG.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while ESSARSHPNG.NS trades at ₹21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas ESSARSHPNG.NS's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ESSARSHPNG.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to ESSARSHPNG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check ESSARSHPNG.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs ABSMARINE.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ABSMARINE.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while ABSMARINE.NS trades at ₹149.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas ABSMARINE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ABSMARINE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to ABSMARINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check ABSMARINE.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs LANCER.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LANCER.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while LANCER.NS trades at ₹149.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas LANCER.NS's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LANCER.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to LANCER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check LANCER.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs TRANSWORLD.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRANSWORLD.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while TRANSWORLD.NS trades at ₹115.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas TRANSWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TRANSWORLD.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is less volatile compared to TRANSWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check TRANSWORLD.NS's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs LANCER.BO Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LANCER.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while LANCER.BO trades at ₹7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas LANCER.BO's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LANCER.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to LANCER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check LANCER.BO's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs CHOWGULSTM.BO Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CHOWGULSTM.BO has a market cap of 660.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while CHOWGULSTM.BO trades at ₹18.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas CHOWGULSTM.BO's P/E ratio is 69.92. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CHOWGULSTM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is less volatile compared to CHOWGULSTM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check CHOWGULSTM.BO's competition here
TRANSWORLD.BO vs GLOBOFFS.NS Comparison April 2026
TRANSWORLD.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRANSWORLD.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GLOBOFFS.NS has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRANSWORLD.BO is priced at ₹115.85, while GLOBOFFS.NS trades at ₹7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRANSWORLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas GLOBOFFS.NS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GLOBOFFS.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRANSWORLD.BO is more volatile compared to GLOBOFFS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRANSWORLD.BO.Check GLOBOFFS.NS's competition here