Gujarat Pipavav Port Limited
Gujarat Pipavav Port Limited (GPPL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GPPL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPPL.NS | ₹159.59 | +4.81% | 75.1B | 15.49 | ₹10.03 | +6.18% |
| ADANIPORTS.BO | ₹1,810.95 | +1.37% | 4.2T | 30.93 | ₹58.29 | +0.39% |
| ADANIPORTS.NS | ₹1,811.20 | +1.36% | 4.2T | 30.95 | ₹58.25 | +0.39% |
| GESHIP.NS | ₹1,650.70 | -0.92% | 235.4B | 8.01 | ₹205.76 | +2.13% |
| GESHIP.BO | ₹1,650.80 | -0.97% | 235.2B | 8.01 | ₹205.63 | +2.13% |
| SCI.BO | ₹308.00 | -2.65% | 141B | 10.42 | ₹29.06 | +4.32% |
| SCI.NS | ₹308.05 | -2.61% | 141B | 10.43 | ₹29.04 | +4.32% |
| GPPL.BO | ₹159.20 | +4.70% | 75.1B | 15.49 | ₹10.03 | +6.18% |
| SHREEJISPG.NS | ₹458.10 | +1.78% | 75B | 46.96 | ₹9.81 | +0.22% |
| SEAMECLTD.NS | ₹1,595.20 | -0.78% | 41.5B | 21.73 | ₹75.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GPPL.NS vs ADANIPORTS.BO Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, ADANIPORTS.BO has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while ADANIPORTS.BO trades at ₹1,810.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ADANIPORTS.BO's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADANIPORTS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is more volatile compared to ADANIPORTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check ADANIPORTS.BO's competition here
GPPL.NS vs ADANIPORTS.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, ADANIPORTS.NS has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while ADANIPORTS.NS trades at ₹1,811.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ADANIPORTS.NS's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADANIPORTS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is more volatile compared to ADANIPORTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check ADANIPORTS.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs GESHIP.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, GESHIP.NS has a market cap of 235.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while GESHIP.NS trades at ₹1,650.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas GESHIP.NS's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GESHIP.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to GESHIP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check GESHIP.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs GESHIP.BO Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, GESHIP.BO has a market cap of 235.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while GESHIP.BO trades at ₹1,650.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas GESHIP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GESHIP.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to GESHIP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check GESHIP.BO's competition here
GPPL.NS vs SCI.BO Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, SCI.BO has a market cap of 141B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while SCI.BO trades at ₹308.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas SCI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SCI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to SCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check SCI.BO's competition here
GPPL.NS vs SCI.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, SCI.NS has a market cap of 141B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while SCI.NS trades at ₹308.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas SCI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SCI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to SCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check SCI.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs GPPL.BO Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, GPPL.BO has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while GPPL.BO trades at ₹159.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas GPPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPPL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to GPPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check GPPL.BO's competition here
GPPL.NS vs SHREEJISPG.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, SHREEJISPG.NS has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while SHREEJISPG.NS trades at ₹458.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas SHREEJISPG.NS's P/E ratio is 46.96. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHREEJISPG.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is more volatile compared to SHREEJISPG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check SHREEJISPG.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs SEAMECLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, SEAMECLTD.NS has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while SEAMECLTD.NS trades at ₹1,595.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas SEAMECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEAMECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to SEAMECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check SEAMECLTD.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs SEAMECLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, SEAMECLTD.BO has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while SEAMECLTD.BO trades at ₹1,594.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas SEAMECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEAMECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to SEAMECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check SEAMECLTD.BO's competition here
GPPL.NS vs MARINE.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, MARINE.NS has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while MARINE.NS trades at ₹245.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas MARINE.NS's P/E ratio is 61.82. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MARINE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to MARINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check MARINE.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs KMEW.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, KMEW.NS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while KMEW.NS trades at ₹2,147.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas KMEW.NS's P/E ratio is 72.76. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KMEW.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to KMEW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check KMEW.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs ABSMARINE.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, ABSMARINE.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while ABSMARINE.NS trades at ₹285.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ABSMARINE.NS's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABSMARINE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to ABSMARINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check ABSMARINE.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs ORICON.BO Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, ORICON.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while ORICON.BO trades at ₹40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ORICON.BO's P/E ratio is -52.92. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ORICON.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to ORICON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check ORICON.BO's competition here
GPPL.NS vs SHREYAS.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, SHREYAS.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while SHREYAS.NS trades at ₹284.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas SHREYAS.NS's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHREYAS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to SHREYAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check SHREYAS.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs SHREYAS.BO Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, SHREYAS.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while SHREYAS.BO trades at ₹282.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas SHREYAS.BO's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHREYAS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to SHREYAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check SHREYAS.BO's competition here
GPPL.NS vs ESSARSHPNG.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, ESSARSHPNG.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while ESSARSHPNG.NS trades at ₹23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ESSARSHPNG.NS's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESSARSHPNG.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to ESSARSHPNG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check ESSARSHPNG.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs ESSARSHPNG.BO Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, ESSARSHPNG.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while ESSARSHPNG.BO trades at ₹23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ESSARSHPNG.BO's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESSARSHPNG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is more volatile compared to ESSARSHPNG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check ESSARSHPNG.BO's competition here
GPPL.NS vs TRANSWORLD.BO Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, TRANSWORLD.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while TRANSWORLD.BO trades at ₹162.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas TRANSWORLD.BO's P/E ratio is -7.81. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is more volatile compared to TRANSWORLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check TRANSWORLD.BO's competition here
GPPL.NS vs TRANSWORLD.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, TRANSWORLD.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while TRANSWORLD.NS trades at ₹162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas TRANSWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is -7.81. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRANSWORLD.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check TRANSWORLD.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs LANCER.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, LANCER.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while LANCER.NS trades at ₹149.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas LANCER.NS's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LANCER.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to LANCER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check LANCER.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs LANCER.BO Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, LANCER.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while LANCER.BO trades at ₹9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas LANCER.BO's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LANCER.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to LANCER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check LANCER.BO's competition here
GPPL.NS vs OLIL.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, OLIL.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while OLIL.NS trades at ₹445.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas OLIL.NS's P/E ratio is 100.90. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OLIL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to OLIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check OLIL.NS's competition here
GPPL.NS vs CHOWGULSTM.BO Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, CHOWGULSTM.BO has a market cap of 886.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while CHOWGULSTM.BO trades at ₹23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CHOWGULSTM.BO's P/E ratio is 93.92. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHOWGULSTM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to CHOWGULSTM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check CHOWGULSTM.BO's competition here
GPPL.NS vs GLOBOFFS.NS Comparison May 2026
GPPL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPPL.NS stands at 75.1B. In comparison, GLOBOFFS.NS has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPPL.NS is priced at ₹159.59, while GLOBOFFS.NS trades at ₹7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas GLOBOFFS.NS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, GPPL.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLOBOFFS.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GPPL.NS is less volatile compared to GLOBOFFS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPPL.NS.Check GLOBOFFS.NS's competition here