Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MDLZ has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $36.24, while MDLZ trades at $60.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas MDLZ's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDLZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is more volatile compared to MDLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check MDLZ's competition here

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HSY has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $36.24, while HSY trades at $172.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas HSY's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is more volatile compared to HSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check HSY's competition here

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, K has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $36.24, while K trades at $83.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas K's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to K's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is more volatile compared to K. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check K's competition here

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BRCB has a market cap of 139.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $36.24, while BRCB trades at $7.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas BRCB's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRCB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is less volatile compared to BRCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check BRCB's competition here

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RMCF has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $36.24, while RMCF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.25, whereas RMCF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMCF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is more volatile compared to RMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check RMCF's competition here