Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MDLZ has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $38.16, while MDLZ trades at $58.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MDLZ's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDLZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is less volatile compared to MDLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check MDLZ's competition here

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HSY has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $38.16, while HSY trades at $173.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas HSY's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is more volatile compared to HSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check HSY's competition here

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, K has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $38.16, while K trades at $83.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas K's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to K's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is more volatile compared to K. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check K's competition here

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RMCF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $38.16, while RMCF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas RMCF's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMCF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is less volatile compared to RMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check RMCF's competition here

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $38.16, while CHSN trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check CHSN's competition here