Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MDLZ has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $41.28, while MDLZ trades at $58.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas MDLZ's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDLZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is less volatile compared to MDLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check MDLZ's competition here

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HSY has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $41.28, while HSY trades at $219.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas HSY's P/E ratio is 51.10. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is less volatile compared to HSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check HSY's competition here

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, K has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $41.28, while K trades at $83.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas K's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to K's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is more volatile compared to K. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check K's competition here

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRCB has a market cap of 227M. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $41.28, while BRCB trades at $12.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas BRCB's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRCB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is less volatile compared to BRCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check BRCB's competition here

TR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RMCF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TR is priced at $41.28, while RMCF trades at $2.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TR currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas RMCF's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, TR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMCF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TR is less volatile compared to RMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TR.Check RMCF's competition here