Touchwood Entertainment Limited
Touchwood Entertainment Limited (TOUCHWOOD.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TOUCHWOOD.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOUCHWOOD.NS | ₹85.13 | -0.08% | 950.3M | 15.23 | ₹5.63 | N/A |
| AFFLE.NS | ₹1,398.50 | -5.90% | 212.3B | 48.32 | ₹31.24 | N/A |
| AFFLE.BO | ₹1,398.35 | -6.08% | 212.2B | 48.49 | ₹31.12 | N/A |
| BCG.BO | ₹11.02 | -0.36% | 23.4B | 2.67 | ₹4.34 | N/A |
| BCG.NS | ₹11.00 | -0.45% | 23.4B | 2.67 | ₹4.34 | N/A |
| SIGNPOST.NS | ₹242.54 | -0.15% | 13B | 25.92 | ₹9.36 | +0.21% |
| PRESSMN.NS | ₹265.00 | -0.54% | 6.2B | 161.59 | ₹1.64 | N/A |
| MAAGHADV.BO | ₹25.42 | +0.00% | 5.7B | -55.26 | -₹0.46 | N/A |
| RKSWAMY.NS | ₹99.74 | -4.41% | 5.2B | 26.97 | ₹3.85 | +1.44% |
| VERTOZ.NS | ₹46.53 | -2.80% | 4B | 9.24 | ₹5.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs AFFLE.NS Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, AFFLE.NS has a market cap of 212.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while AFFLE.NS trades at ₹1,398.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AFFLE.NS's P/E ratio is 48.32. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFFLE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is less volatile compared to AFFLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check AFFLE.NS's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs AFFLE.BO Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, AFFLE.BO has a market cap of 212.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while AFFLE.BO trades at ₹1,398.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AFFLE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.49. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFFLE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is less volatile compared to AFFLE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check AFFLE.BO's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs BCG.BO Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, BCG.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while BCG.BO trades at ₹11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas BCG.BO's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCG.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is more volatile compared to BCG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check BCG.BO's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs BCG.NS Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, BCG.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while BCG.NS trades at ₹11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas BCG.NS's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCG.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is less volatile compared to BCG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check BCG.NS's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs SIGNPOST.NS Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, SIGNPOST.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while SIGNPOST.NS trades at ₹242.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas SIGNPOST.NS's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIGNPOST.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is less volatile compared to SIGNPOST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check SIGNPOST.NS's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs PRESSMN.NS Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, PRESSMN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while PRESSMN.NS trades at ₹265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas PRESSMN.NS's P/E ratio is 161.59. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRESSMN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is less volatile compared to PRESSMN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check PRESSMN.NS's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs MAAGHADV.BO Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, MAAGHADV.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while MAAGHADV.BO trades at ₹25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas MAAGHADV.BO's P/E ratio is -55.26. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAAGHADV.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is more volatile compared to MAAGHADV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check MAAGHADV.BO's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs RKSWAMY.NS Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, RKSWAMY.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while RKSWAMY.NS trades at ₹99.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas RKSWAMY.NS's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKSWAMY.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is less volatile compared to RKSWAMY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check RKSWAMY.NS's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs VERTOZ.NS Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, VERTOZ.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while VERTOZ.NS trades at ₹46.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas VERTOZ.NS's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VERTOZ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is less volatile compared to VERTOZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check VERTOZ.NS's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs CIL.BO Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, CIL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while CIL.BO trades at ₹264.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1391.32. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is more volatile compared to CIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check CIL.BO's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs LUHARUKA.BO Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, LUHARUKA.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while LUHARUKA.BO trades at ₹4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas LUHARUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 235.00. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUHARUKA.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is less volatile compared to LUHARUKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check LUHARUKA.BO's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs INNOVATUS.BO Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, INNOVATUS.BO has a market cap of 342.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while INNOVATUS.BO trades at ₹14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas INNOVATUS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INNOVATUS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is less volatile compared to INNOVATUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check INNOVATUS.BO's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs BRANDBUCKT.BO Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, BRANDBUCKT.BO has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while BRANDBUCKT.BO trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas BRANDBUCKT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is less volatile compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check BRANDBUCKT.BO's competition here
TOUCHWOOD.NS vs DAPS.BO Comparison February 2026
TOUCHWOOD.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOUCHWOOD.NS stands at 950.3M. In comparison, DAPS.BO has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, TOUCHWOOD.NS is priced at ₹85.13, while DAPS.BO trades at ₹17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOUCHWOOD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas DAPS.BO's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAPS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOUCHWOOD.NS is more volatile compared to DAPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOUCHWOOD.NS.Check DAPS.BO's competition here