Citizen Infoline Limited
Citizen Infoline Limited (CIL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CIL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIL.BO | ₹234.65 | -1.96% | 1.3B | 1247.37 | ₹0.19 | N/A |
| AFFLE.BO | ₹1,455.95 | -2.72% | 207.8B | 45.74 | ₹32.30 | N/A |
| AFFLE.NS | ₹1,456.20 | -2.57% | 207.7B | 45.65 | ₹32.36 | N/A |
| BCG.BO | ₹9.11 | +0.11% | 18.8B | 2.15 | ₹4.34 | N/A |
| BCG.NS | ₹9.09 | +0.22% | 18.7B | 2.13 | ₹4.34 | N/A |
| SIGNPOST.NS | ₹269.85 | -2.58% | 15.1B | 30.10 | ₹9.37 | +0.18% |
| PRESSMN.NS | ₹265.00 | -0.54% | 6.2B | 161.59 | ₹1.64 | N/A |
| MAAGHADV.BO | ₹25.42 | +0.00% | 5.7B | -55.26 | -₹0.46 | N/A |
| RKSWAMY.NS | ₹89.58 | -0.64% | 4.6B | 24.74 | ₹3.67 | +1.65% |
| VERTOZ.NS | ₹43.92 | -8.33% | 3.9B | 9.02 | ₹5.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CIL.BO vs AFFLE.BO Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFFLE.BO has a market cap of 207.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while AFFLE.BO trades at ₹1,455.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas AFFLE.BO's P/E ratio is 45.74. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFFLE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to AFFLE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check AFFLE.BO's competition here
CIL.BO vs AFFLE.NS Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFFLE.NS has a market cap of 207.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while AFFLE.NS trades at ₹1,456.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas AFFLE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFFLE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to AFFLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check AFFLE.NS's competition here
CIL.BO vs BCG.BO Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BCG.BO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while BCG.BO trades at ₹9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas BCG.BO's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCG.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to BCG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check BCG.BO's competition here
CIL.BO vs BCG.NS Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BCG.NS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while BCG.NS trades at ₹9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas BCG.NS's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCG.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to BCG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check BCG.NS's competition here
CIL.BO vs SIGNPOST.NS Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SIGNPOST.NS has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while SIGNPOST.NS trades at ₹269.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas SIGNPOST.NS's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIGNPOST.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to SIGNPOST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check SIGNPOST.NS's competition here
CIL.BO vs PRESSMN.NS Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRESSMN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while PRESSMN.NS trades at ₹265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas PRESSMN.NS's P/E ratio is 161.59. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRESSMN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to PRESSMN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check PRESSMN.NS's competition here
CIL.BO vs MAAGHADV.BO Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MAAGHADV.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while MAAGHADV.BO trades at ₹25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas MAAGHADV.BO's P/E ratio is -55.26. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAAGHADV.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO and MAAGHADV.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAAGHADV.BO's competition here
CIL.BO vs RKSWAMY.NS Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RKSWAMY.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while RKSWAMY.NS trades at ₹89.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas RKSWAMY.NS's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RKSWAMY.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to RKSWAMY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check RKSWAMY.NS's competition here
CIL.BO vs VERTOZ.NS Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VERTOZ.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while VERTOZ.NS trades at ₹43.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas VERTOZ.NS's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VERTOZ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to VERTOZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check VERTOZ.NS's competition here
CIL.BO vs LUHARUKA.BO Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LUHARUKA.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while LUHARUKA.BO trades at ₹4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas LUHARUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 235.00. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LUHARUKA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to LUHARUKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check LUHARUKA.BO's competition here
CIL.BO vs MAXPOSURE.NS Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MAXPOSURE.NS has a market cap of 860.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while MAXPOSURE.NS trades at ₹37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas MAXPOSURE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAXPOSURE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to MAXPOSURE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check MAXPOSURE.NS's competition here
CIL.BO vs CRAYONS.NS Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CRAYONS.NS has a market cap of 803.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while CRAYONS.NS trades at ₹32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas CRAYONS.NS's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRAYONS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to CRAYONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check CRAYONS.NS's competition here
CIL.BO vs TOUCHWOOD.NS Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TOUCHWOOD.NS has a market cap of 801.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while TOUCHWOOD.NS trades at ₹70.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas TOUCHWOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TOUCHWOOD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to TOUCHWOOD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check TOUCHWOOD.NS's competition here
CIL.BO vs GRAPHISAD.NS Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRAPHISAD.NS has a market cap of 658M. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while GRAPHISAD.NS trades at ₹36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas GRAPHISAD.NS's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRAPHISAD.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to GRAPHISAD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check GRAPHISAD.NS's competition here
CIL.BO vs INNOVATUS.BO Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, INNOVATUS.BO has a market cap of 342.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while INNOVATUS.BO trades at ₹14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas INNOVATUS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INNOVATUS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to INNOVATUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check INNOVATUS.BO's competition here
CIL.BO vs DAPS.BO Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DAPS.BO has a market cap of 121.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while DAPS.BO trades at ₹23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas DAPS.BO's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DAPS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO and DAPS.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DAPS.BO's competition here
CIL.BO vs BRANDBUCKT.BO Comparison May 2026
CIL.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIL.BO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BRANDBUCKT.BO has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIL.BO is priced at ₹234.65, while BRANDBUCKT.BO trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1247.37, whereas BRANDBUCKT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, CIL.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIL.BO is less volatile compared to BRANDBUCKT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIL.BO.Check BRANDBUCKT.BO's competition here