Toei Animation Co.,Ltd.
Toei Animation Co.,Ltd. TOEAF Peers
See (TOEAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOEAF | $22.42 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 28.74 | $0.78 | +0.01% |
| UMGNF | $32.49 | +2.51% | 59.6B | 24.80 | $1.31 | +1.79% |
| UNVGY | $16.20 | +2.73% | 59.4B | 24.55 | $0.66 | +2.48% |
| FWONB | $91.75 | +0.00% | 31.7B | 1529.17 | $0.06 | N/A |
| BOIVF | $6.33 | +1.77% | 17.6B | 105.50 | $0.06 | +1.39% |
| NWSAL | $26.80 | +0.00% | 17.3B | 43.23 | $0.62 | +0.75% |
| CEVMY | $31.86 | +0.00% | 12.2B | 35.39 | $0.90 | +0.93% |
| CEVMF | $125.65 | +0.00% | 12.1B | 34.81 | $3.61 | +1.51% |
| VIVEF | $10.49 | +2.64% | 10.6B | 22.80 | $0.46 | N/A |
| TKCOF | $62.01 | +0.00% | 10.5B | 30.85 | $2.01 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
TOEAF vs UMGNF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UMGNF has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while UMGNF trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas UMGNF's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UMGNF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to UMGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs UNVGY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while UNVGY trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs FWONB Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while FWONB trades at $91.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is 1529.17. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FWONB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to FWONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs BOIVF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BOIVF trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 105.50. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs NWSAL Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CEVMY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CEVMY trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CEVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CEVMF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CEVMF trades at $125.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 34.81. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CEVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs VIVEF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to VIVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs TKCOF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TKCOF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while TKCOF trades at $62.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas TKCOF's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TKCOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to TKCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs VIVHY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while VIVHY trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -19.21. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs MCHOY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while MCHOY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is 44.33. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCHOY's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to MCHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs MCOIF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while MCOIF trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is 41.77. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCOIF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to MCOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs NANHF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NANHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to NANHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs NNMTF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to NNMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs NENTY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NENTY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to NENTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CYFWF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CYFWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs ATVDY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ATVDY trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ATVDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CYFWY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CYFWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs MHSDF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while MHSDF trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 41.89. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to MHSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs AIOSF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while AIOSF trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to AIOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs JVTSF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while JVTSF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -341.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to JVTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs TCLRY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to TCLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CIEZF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 671.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CIEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CPXGF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 518.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CPXGF trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -8.98. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs BORUF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 496.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BORUF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BORUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to BORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs IMXCF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 373.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while IMXCF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to IMXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs WLDBF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 316.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while WLDBF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CLTFF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 242.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CLTFF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs AFCJF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while AFCJF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -17.90. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CLQDF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLQDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CLQDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs NENTF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 161.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NENTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs APTTF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 126.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while APTTF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APTTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to APTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs GOAI Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GOAI has a market cap of 116M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while GOAI trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas GOAI's P/E ratio is -52.86. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GOAI's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to GOAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs STEAF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while STEAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to STEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs ANGMF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ANGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs THBRF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while THBRF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs GMSQF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs ZUMRF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ZUMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs ICABY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ICABY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs LGMH Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while LGMH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LGMH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs OAMCF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while OAMCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OAMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs DTTVY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while DTTVY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to DTTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs APHP Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while APHP trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -19.46. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APHP's ROE of +6.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to APHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs QYOUF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while QYOUF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QYOUF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to QYOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs ASGRF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ASGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs BBOP Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BBOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BBOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CNWGQ Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs XOEEF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XOEEF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs HHSE Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while HHSE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs AMFL Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while AMFL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CNNWQ Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs HWAL Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while HWAL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs MVNC Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while MVNC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs TRMNF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while TRMNF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to TRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs ICABF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ICABF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ICABF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas ICABF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ICABF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ICABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs BLIBQ Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to BLIBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs STGZ Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while STGZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STGZ's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs BLIAQ Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BLIAQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BLIAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs ENTEF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ENTEF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENTEF's ROE of +602.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ENTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs EEGI Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while EEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs LTES Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while LTES trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs GULDF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while GULDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GULDF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CAPV Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CAPV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs ITVI Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ITVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to ITVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs HQGE Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while HQGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HQGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to HQGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs NETWF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NETWF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to NETWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs BSEG Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BSEG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to BSEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs HDUP Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while HDUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to HDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs STCXF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, STCXF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while STCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas STCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STCXF's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to STCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs RLTR Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while RLTR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to RLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs SONG Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SONG has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while SONG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas SONG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SONG's ROE of -9.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to SONG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs SEGI Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 978.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while SEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to SEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs AFOM Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AFOM has a market cap of 925.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while AFOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas AFOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFOM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to AFOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs VNUE Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 886.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while VNUE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs WRIT Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 697.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while WRIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to WRIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs UMGP Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 582.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while UMGP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to UMGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CCLX Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CCLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs TAMG Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while TAMG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to TAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs BOTY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 460.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BOTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOTY's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs WEBB Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while WEBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to WEBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs IMTV Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 313.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while IMTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to IMTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CEXE Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEXE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs RIVU Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while RIVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to RIVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs MIKP Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while MIKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to MIKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs VGTL Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 205.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while VGTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs MLFB Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while MLFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to MLFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs SNMN Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while SNMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to SNMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs RWMI Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 95.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while RWMI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to RWMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs PLFX Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 85.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while PLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to PLFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs SAPX Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SAPX has a market cap of 65.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while SAPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas SAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to SAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs URBT Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while URBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to URBT's ROE of +67.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to URBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs SVSN Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SVSN has a market cap of 58K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while SVSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas SVSN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SVSN's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to SVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs GBHL Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while GBHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBHL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to GBHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs AMRU Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 47.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while AMRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMRU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to AMRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs HOMU Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HOMU has a market cap of 37.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while HOMU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas HOMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to HOMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs SAKL Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SAKL has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while SAKL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas SAKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAKL's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to SAKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs XSPT Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while XSPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to XSPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs GTOR Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GTOR has a market cap of 24.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while GTOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas GTOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GTOR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is more volatile compared to GTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs AMXX Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AMXX has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while AMXX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.74, whereas AMXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMXX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to AMXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.