Toei Animation Co.,Ltd.
Toei Animation Co.,Ltd. TOEAF Peers
See (TOEAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOEAF | $22.42 | +4.33% | 4.6B | 28.03 | $0.80 | +0.01% |
| UNVGY | $16.18 | +0.00% | 59.1B | 23.82 | $0.66 | +2.55% |
| UMGNF | $32.82 | +0.00% | 58.6B | 24.40 | $1.31 | +1.77% |
| FWONB | $90.00 | -4.41% | 33.6B | 1935.40 | $0.05 | N/A |
| BOIVF | $6.28 | +0.00% | 17.4B | 104.23 | $0.06 | +1.39% |
| NWSAL | $26.80 | +0.00% | 16.7B | 43.23 | $0.62 | +0.75% |
| CEVMF | $125.65 | +0.00% | 12.1B | 35.29 | $3.56 | +1.51% |
| CEVMY | $31.85 | -0.02% | 11.8B | 34.54 | $0.89 | +0.96% |
| VIVEF | $10.49 | +2.64% | 10.6B | 22.80 | $0.46 | N/A |
| TKCOF | $43.45 | +0.00% | 10.2B | 30.52 | $2.01 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
TOEAF vs UNVGY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while UNVGY trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs UMGNF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UMGNF has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while UMGNF trades at $32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas UMGNF's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UMGNF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to UMGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs FWONB Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while FWONB trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is 1935.40. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FWONB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and FWONB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs BOIVF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BOIVF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 104.23. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs NWSAL Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and NWSAL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs CEVMF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CEVMF trades at $125.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and CEVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs CEVMY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CEVMY trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and CEVMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs VIVEF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and VIVEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs TKCOF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TKCOF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while TKCOF trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas TKCOF's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TKCOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and TKCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs VIVHY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while VIVHY trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -15.74. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs MCHOY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while MCHOY trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is 44.47. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCHOY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to MCHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CYFWF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and CYFWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs MCOIF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while MCOIF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCOIF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and MCOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs NANHF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NANHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and NANHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs NNMTF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and NNMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs NENTY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NENTY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and NENTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs JVTSF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while JVTSF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -380.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and JVTSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs NENTF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NENTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -14.94. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and NENTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs ATVDY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ATVDY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and ATVDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs MHSDF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while MHSDF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and MHSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs AIOSF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while AIOSF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and AIOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs TCLRY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to TCLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CIEZF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 671.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and CIEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs CYFWY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 556.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and CYFWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs CPXGF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 539.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CPXGF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -9.34. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs BORUF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 496.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BORUF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BORUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and BORUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs IMXCF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while IMXCF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and IMXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs WLDBF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 331.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while WLDBF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +30.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CLTFF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 256.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CLTFF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and CLTFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs CLQDF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLQDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and CLQDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs AFCJF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 192.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while AFCJF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and AFCJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs APTTF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while APTTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APTTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and APTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs STEAF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while STEAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and STEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs ANGMF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and ANGMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs GOAI Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GOAI has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while GOAI trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas GOAI's P/E ratio is -28.57. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GOAI's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and GOAI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs THBRF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while THBRF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs GMSQF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs ZUMRF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and ZUMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs DTTVY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while DTTVY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and DTTVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs LGMH Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while LGMH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LGMH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs APHP Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while APHP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -18.80. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APHP's ROE of +6.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to APHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs OAMCF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while OAMCF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OAMCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and OAMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs ICABY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ICABY trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and ICABY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs ASGRF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and ASGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs QYOUF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while QYOUF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QYOUF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and QYOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs BBOP Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BBOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and BBOP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs CNWGQ Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs XOEEF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XOEEF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs HWAL Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while HWAL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CNNWQ Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs GULDF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while GULDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GULDF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and GULDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs MVNC Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while MVNC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and MVNC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs AMFL Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while AMFL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs ICABF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ICABF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ICABF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas ICABF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICABF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and ICABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs HHSE Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while HHSE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs STGZ Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while STGZ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STGZ's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs EEGI Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while EEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs LTES Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while LTES trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs BLIAQ Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BLIAQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and BLIAQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs BLIBQ Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and BLIBQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs ENTEF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ENTEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ENTEF's ROE of -7.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and ENTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs CAPV Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CAPV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs ITVI Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while ITVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and ITVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs TRMNF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while TRMNF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and TRMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs BSEG Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BSEG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and BSEG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs HDUP Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while HDUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and HDUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs NETWF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NETWF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and NETWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs SEGI Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while SEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to SEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs STCXF Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, STCXF has a market cap of 966.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while STCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas STCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STCXF's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and STCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs BOTY Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 921K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while BOTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOTY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs VNUE Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 886.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while VNUE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs HQGE Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 774K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while HQGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HQGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to HQGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs WRIT Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 662.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while WRIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and WRIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs UMGP Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 582.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while UMGP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and UMGP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs CCLX Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CCLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and CCLX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs RLTR Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 482.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while RLTR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and RLTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs TAMG Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while TAMG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and TAMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs WEBB Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while WEBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and WEBB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs IMTV Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 313.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while IMTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and IMTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs VGTL Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 308.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while VGTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF is less volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOEAF.
TOEAF vs CEXE Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while CEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEXE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and CEXE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs RIVU Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while RIVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and RIVU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs MIKP Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while MIKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and MIKP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs MLFB Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while MLFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and MLFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs RWMI Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 86.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while RWMI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and RWMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs PLFX Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 85.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while PLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and PLFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs SAPX Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SAPX has a market cap of 73.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while SAPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas SAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and SAPX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs URBT Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while URBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to URBT's ROE of +67.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and URBT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs SVSN Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SVSN has a market cap of 58K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while SVSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas SVSN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVSN's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and SVSN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs GBHL Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while GBHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBHL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and GBHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs AMRU Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 47.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while AMRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMRU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and AMRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs HOMU Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HOMU has a market cap of 37.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while HOMU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas HOMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HOMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and HOMU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs XSPT Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while XSPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and XSPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs GTOR Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GTOR has a market cap of 24.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while GTOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas GTOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTOR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and GTOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs SAKL Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SAKL has a market cap of 23.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while SAKL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas SAKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAKL's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and SAKL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs AMXX Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AMXX has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while AMXX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas AMXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMXX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and AMXX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs AVPI Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AVPI has a market cap of 21.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while AVPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas AVPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVPI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and AVPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs IFLM Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IFLM has a market cap of 19.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while IFLM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas IFLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFLM's ROE of +3.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and IFLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TOEAF vs NLMP Comparison
TOEAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOEAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NLMP has a market cap of 19K. Regarding current trading prices, TOEAF is priced at $22.42, while NLMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOEAF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.03, whereas NLMP's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TOEAF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NLMP's ROE of +2.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TOEAF and NLMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).